What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

No Justice For Ashli??

bodecea

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
144,351
Reaction score
19,506
Points
2,180
Location
#HasNoClothes
They were not all violent, not even fucking close. You are justifying murder to distract from the massive fraud. POS.
They were beating in a glass window in a barricade doorway.

So yeah, it was violent mob that she chose to be a part of.
She was "bringing the storm" and got struck by lightning.
 

Lastamender

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
12,673
Reaction score
7,679
Points
1,050
They were not all violent, not even fucking close. You are justifying murder to distract from the massive fraud. POS.
They were beating in a glass window in a barricade doorway.

So yeah, it was violent mob that she chose to be a part of.
Break a window and get shot? There would have been many shot this summer.
 

bodecea

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
144,351
Reaction score
19,506
Points
2,180
Location
#HasNoClothes

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.
How do you know that? Were you there?
 

JusticeHammer

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
3,123
Reaction score
1,313
Points
210
The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.
The kid in minneapolis got exacywhat he deserved to. Hypocrite.

Oh of course he did, that's what you think should happen to black folks.
His race isn't to blame, his stupidity is. Sounds like you're just as stupid.
 

Lastamender

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
12,673
Reaction score
7,679
Points
1,050

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.
How do you know that? Were you there?
Because even your lying media said so. Anyone armed did not enter the Capitol building. Why don't you show me something that said they did? I'll wait.
 

JusticeHammer

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
3,123
Reaction score
1,313
Points
210
No, she was an unarmed civilian trespassing in the capital buildings. If this officer had shot her anywhere else he'd be up on charges of murder.
If the person the cop killed was a black man you would be singing a much different tune.

No I wouldn't and don't put your racist bull shit on me. When you don't have an answer you pull the oh so overused racist card. Dumbass.

An unarmed woman was shot. Doesn't matter what color she was. She was UNARMED.

If you had an angry mob pounding on your front door demanding to get in and they smash a window and start climbing through.......Do you shoot?

She was stuck in a window idiot. She was unarmed. No reason to shoot an unarmed person.
How was the cop supposed to know she was unarmed?

He has eyes, he can see. Hell she was stuck in a window.
I see, so he is Superman. He has x-ray vision and could see under her clothes and in her backpack.

Next time you insurrectionists Invade the Capitol, bring kryptonite to the gunfight.

No but he could see her hands. That's where a gun would be, no??

Insurrectionists?? What a joke. Most of them are being charged with trespassing.
Rioters. Insurrectionists. Vandals. Thieves. Public defecators. Assaulters. Murderers. and totally insane.
You just described the left.
 

AzogtheDefiler

The Pale Orc
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
40,559
Reaction score
14,328
Points
2,260
Location
Boston, MA
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
OK but there were armed police officers like seven feet from her. That being said, I think all protesters once they become rioters should be shot. I have zero issues with this.
Which means you would have been on the side of the loyalists.....clutching your pearls at the riotous behavior of those Bostonians with their tea parties and their destruction of property....
Yeah, the conflation could not be more false but in the end victors write history. I'd put your pen down, leftist.
 

Claudette

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
42,230
Reaction score
12,866
Points
2,250

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.

That's what they do. Lie. Not one of the trespasser was armed.

The only guns were those carried by Capital police and whichever of the Congressmen were armed.

The unarmed protester was the only one shot.
 

Rambunctious

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
41,473
Reaction score
24,050
Points
2,605
The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

She was not an insurretionist.

May you or one your family members wind up the same way she did.

You are scum.
She was a traitor who got what she deserved.
Same with street punks that won't obey an officers commands....
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
77,253
Reaction score
15,640
Points
2,210

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.
So? They grossly outnumbered police and they used weapons other than guns.
 
OP
Biff_Poindexter

Biff_Poindexter

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
14,016
Reaction score
5,111
Points
360
Location
USA
The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.
The kid in minneapolis got exacywhat he deserved to. Hypocrite.

Oh of course he did, that's what you think should happen to black folks.
His race isn't to blame, his stupidity is. Sounds like you're just as stupid.
What about the kid in Maryland?? Did he get exactly what he deserved or did Stormfront not tell you the official racist response to that story yet??

 
OP
Biff_Poindexter

Biff_Poindexter

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
14,016
Reaction score
5,111
Points
360
Location
USA
The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

She was not an insurretionist.

May you or one your family members wind up the same way she did.

You are scum.
She was a traitor who got what she deserved.
Same with street punks that won't obey an officers commands....
Remember when officers commanded insurrectionists to not enter the Capitol building and they did anyway??

I guess they get whatever they deserve after that point huh
 

Lesh

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
24,765
Reaction score
7,282
Points
290
That was the Ferguson crap. Oh and Mike Brown was far from an angel.

As for his killing?? Justified?? Yes.
Try to keep your arguments consistent.

The shooting of Ashlii Targetpractice was unjustified because she had no gun in her hand but the shooting of Mike Brown (also no gun in his hand) WAS justified?

If you're claiming that white women can not be dangerous you have not met my first wife...
 

JusticeHammer

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
3,123
Reaction score
1,313
Points
210
The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.
The kid in minneapolis got exacywhat he deserved to. Hypocrite.

Oh of course he did, that's what you think should happen to black folks.
His race isn't to blame, his stupidity is. Sounds like you're just as stupid.
What about the kid in Maryland?? Did he get exactly what he deserved or did Stormfront not tell you the official racist response to that story yet??

Yep.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
11,101
Reaction score
2,398
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.
The kid in minneapolis got exacywhat he deserved to. Hypocrite.

Oh of course he did, that's what you think should happen to black folks.
His race isn't to blame, his stupidity is. Sounds like you're just as stupid.

Sure it is, do you really think she would have shot a young white man. Instead of JusticeHammer, JusticeHypocrite sounds better.
 

Lastamender

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
12,673
Reaction score
7,679
Points
1,050

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.
So? They grossly outnumbered police and they used weapons other than guns.
The police were told to stand down. It could have all been prevented. They killed no one, the Capitol police did.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
77,253
Reaction score
15,640
Points
2,210

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.

That's what they do. Lie. Not one of the trespasser was armed.

The only guns were those carried by Capital police and whichever of the Congressmen were armed.

The unarmed protester was the only one shot.
"That's what they do. Lie. Not one of the trespasser was armed."

The liar is you.

Among the weapons they were armed with, and some used, were:

stun stick
taser
pepper spray
baseball bat
hockey stick
crutches
flagpole
spear
fire extinguisher
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
77,253
Reaction score
15,640
Points
2,210

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...
She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.
No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop fucking lying.
Dumbfuck, arms are not limited to guns.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$20.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top