How do you then justify the killing of Michael Brown?>He had no gun in his hands and in fact none on his personOh she would be considered armed if she had a gun on her person. Which she didn't. There was no gun in her hands. She was using those to get through the window.
How was the cop to know if she had a gun in her waistband? Or in her backpack? Or a bomb in her backpack?
You approve of her actions. That's the only logical reason for your inane defense here.