No Joke: GOP says Obama for Big Business and they are for the poor and middle class

[Harry Dresden]

Texas 5th District - Election 2010 - The New York Times

I was watching Morning Joe and they had Congressman Jeb Hensarling from Texas 5th District.

This is no joke, he said Obama is for "big business" and the Republicans and him are trying to protect the poor and the middle class by stopping them from getting health insurance. HUH????

Look where he gets his money from. Banks and Insurance companies. And a third of the people in his district make less than $25 grand.

I believe one of the problems Republicans have is they still think they can stand up and lie right into a camera while talking to the American people and no one is going to "go look".

What sunk their last campaign were all the lies. About Obama ending the welfare work requirement, about moving manufacturing for jeeps sold in the US to China and so on.

But this idea that the GOP is for the poor and middle class? Seriously? I bet even USMB Republicans don't defend that one. They might give it a go, but their hearts won't be in it.

The two things the GObP care about is money and fetuses. That's it. Screw everything else.

thats it?.....are you sure?.....they dont care for nothing else?....

 

[regent]

The quote was inevitable, but the question is: how many believe it?

 

[Edgetho]

Texas 5th District - Election 2010 - The New York Times

I was watching Morning Joe and they had Congressman Jeb Hensarling from Texas 5th District.

This is no joke, he said Obama is for "big business" and the Republicans and him are trying to protect the poor and the middle class by stopping them from getting health insurance. HUH????

Look where he gets his money from. Banks and Insurance companies. And a third of the people in his district make less than $25 grand.

I believe one of the problems Republicans have is they still think they can stand up and lie right into a camera while talking to the American people and no one is going to "go look".

What sunk their last campaign were all the lies. About Obama ending the welfare work requirement, about moving manufacturing for jeeps sold in the US to China and so on.But this idea that the GOP is for the poor and middle class? Seriously? I bet even USMB Republicans don't defend that one. They might give it a go, but their hearts won't be in it.

News Flash about lie number one:



News Flash about lie number two.

How Obama has gutted welfare reform - Washington Post

The 1996 welfare reform law required that a portion of the able-bodied adults in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program — the successor to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program — work or prepare for work. Those work requirements were the heart of the reform’s success: Welfare rolls dropped by half, and the poverty rate for black children reached its lowest level in history in the years following.

But the Obama administration has jettisoned the law’s work requirements, asserting that, in the future, no state will be required to follow them. In place of the legislated work requirements, the administration has stated, it will unilaterally design its own “work” systems without congressional involvement or consent. Any state will be free to follow the new Obama requirements “in lieu of” the written statute.

You were saying!

Do you even read your own link? The Jeeps made in China are for the Chinese market.

For now.

But that's not the point. The point is.... They're displacing American-Made Jeeps that were previously SHIPPED TO CHINA.

I understand the Business Model for building something where you sell it. It makes sense.

But it's still a 'foot in the door' and we should expect Chrysler to start importing Jeeps from China in a few years.

Or, at the very least, do like the Japanese do and make all the 'value-added' parts in Japan, ship them here and assemble them and get away with calling them American-Made.

Right

 

[Stephanie]

well we know for sure the Democrats and their sheep DON'T give a crap about fetuses...They are the abortion party

and they care a hell of lot for money, when 7 out of 10 top wealthiest congresscrittes are DEMOCRATS

you see how they feed you people shit? the sad part is some fall for it and just regurgitate it

 

[Vox]

There's no doubt that socialist "O" is just another Big Business butt kisser. (I'm serious)
And Paul Ryan's budget isn't pro-the rich. (I'm not serious)
The truth of the matter is that it's been several decades since we have had a balanced approach towards Big Business, the wealthy and the working Middle Class, the later segment seems to always get forgotten.
Money talks.

Can't disagree on that.

Now, if you would explain to me, please, why would you choose to support the lying scum of the earth if you know thy are lying scumbags which benefit the big business a.k.a. dimocraps? Unless you are the part of the beneficiaries, then it is obvious and understandable.

 

[kiwiman127]

There's no doubt that socialist "O" is just another Big Business butt kisser. (I'm serious)
And Paul Ryan's budget isn't pro-the rich. (I'm not serious)
The truth of the matter is that it's been several decades since we have had a balanced approach towards Big Business, the wealthy and the working Middle Class, the later segment seems to always get forgotten.
Money talks.

Can't disagree on that.

Now, if you would explain to me, please, why would you choose to support the lying scum of the earth if you know thy are lying scumbags which benefit the big business a.k.a. dimocraps? Unless you are the part of the beneficiaries, then it is obvious and understandable.

I support none of the above.

 

[kiwiman127]

Just who do you think is involved in ObamaNoCare? BIG BUSINESS

you really are sheep to think Democrats aren't for Big business...It's easy to crow they are for the poor when it ISN'T THEIR monies they are DISHING OUT...Obama just want's the government to TAKE OVER the business now...take insurance, GM, ETC

the Democrat party has become the Fascist party of the United states

and you who think the government should TAKE CARE OF YOU will be the ruin of this country

I realize you're probably too busy to watch this right now, but I recommend it when you have the time.

It helps you understand that libturdism isn't a political belief, it's a pathology

Here's Evan Sayet's speech on his thesis "the Kindergarten of Eden," which also served as the title of a book he wrote. The basic idea is that leftists engage in a child-level moral reasoning which precludes them from ranking things in terms of highest-sought good and lower-sought goods. It all winds up a childlike jumble in their heads, and all they can say is "We want what's best," without bothering themselves to figure out what that might mean.

They just know you're wrong about what it means.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGBkJT2L55k&feature=player_embedded]Evan Sayet - Kindergarden of Eden - YouTube[/ame]

I stole it from Ace of Spades HQ

Well now look what you've done! You've opened the door for someone to post Bill Maher's opinion.

 

[Vox]

There's no doubt that socialist "O" is just another Big Business butt kisser. (I'm serious)
And Paul Ryan's budget isn't pro-the rich. (I'm not serious)
The truth of the matter is that it's been several decades since we have had a balanced approach towards Big Business, the wealthy and the working Middle Class, the later segment seems to always get forgotten.
Money talks.

Oh right...Obama didn't spend practically all of 2011 fighting to increases taxes on people with 250,000 or more (which in the end he got)

Also didn't support a health reform with an employer mandate.

How does any of that harm Big Business in any way?

Tell me.

What it does, is it hurts SMALL Businesses. Big Businesses couldn't care less.

You really aren't very bright, are you?

One, who considers 200K to be a million is stupid by default. And that what this brainless parrot just stated.

 

[Vox]

There's no doubt that socialist "O" is just another Big Business butt kisser. (I'm serious)
And Paul Ryan's budget isn't pro-the rich. (I'm not serious)
The truth of the matter is that it's been several decades since we have had a balanced approach towards Big Business, the wealthy and the working Middle Class, the later segment seems to always get forgotten.
Money talks.

Can't disagree on that.

Now, if you would explain to me, please, why would you choose to support the lying scum of the earth if you know thy are lying scumbags which benefit the big business a.k.a. dimocraps? Unless you are the part of the beneficiaries, then it is obvious and understandable.

I support none of the above.

And vote democrat, don't you? Now, how about cognitive dissonance

 

[kiwiman127]

Can't disagree on that.

Now, if you would explain to me, please, why would you choose to support the lying scum of the earth if you know thy are lying scumbags which benefit the big business a.k.a. dimocraps? Unless you are the part of the beneficiaries, then it is obvious and understandable.

I support none of the above.

And vote democrat, don't you? Now, how about cognitive dissonance

On occasion I vote for Dems and on occasions I vote GOP. On occasion I vote for Independents. I don't vote for ideological goose-steppers. I vote for my interests and the interests of the working Middle Class. I also vote for candidates who put their constituents over party and are firm believers in compromise. This vote requirement has been harder and harder to realize.

 

[rdean]

Texas 5th District - Election 2010 - The New York Times

I was watching Morning Joe and they had Congressman Jeb Hensarling from Texas 5th District.

This is no joke, he said Obama is for "big business" and the Republicans and him are trying to protect the poor and the middle class by stopping them from getting health insurance. HUH????

Look where he gets his money from. Banks and Insurance companies. And a third of the people in his district make less than $25 grand.

I believe one of the problems Republicans have is they still think they can stand up and lie right into a camera while talking to the American people and no one is going to "go look".

What sunk their last campaign were all the lies. About Obama ending the welfare work requirement, about moving manufacturing for jeeps sold in the US to China and so on.But this idea that the GOP is for the poor and middle class? Seriously? I bet even USMB Republicans don't defend that one. They might give it a go, but their hearts won't be in it.

News Flash about lie number one:

By Stephen Jewkes and Stefano Rebaudo
MILAN | Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:51pm GMT
(Reuters) - Fiat (FIA.MI) and its U.S. unit Chrysler expect to roll out at least 100,000 Jeeps in China when production starts in 2014 as they seek to catch up with rivals in the world's biggest car market.
Output could double, the Italian carmaker's Chief Executive Sergio Marchionne, without giving a precise timeframe.
Chrysler, in which Fiat has a 58.5 percent stake, said on Tuesday it had agreed to make Jeeps in China with Guangzhou Automobile Group

News Flash about lie number two.

How Obama has gutted welfare reform - Washington Post

The 1996 welfare reform law required that a portion of the able-bodied adults in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program — the successor to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program — work or prepare for work. Those work requirements were the heart of the reform’s success: Welfare rolls dropped by half, and the poverty rate for black children reached its lowest level in history in the years following.

But the Obama administration has jettisoned the law’s work requirements, asserting that, in the future, no state will be required to follow them. In place of the legislated work requirements, the administration has stated, it will unilaterally design its own “work” systems without congressional involvement or consent. Any state will be free to follow the new Obama requirements “in lieu of” the written statute.

You were saying!

You might consider using an actual news story instead of biased and untrue opinion. Have you ever considered that? It was Republican governors who asked Obama to waive the welfare work requirement. What do you think of that?

Fact check: Romney's welfare claims wrong - CNN.com

Clinton calls out 'disappointing' Romney ad
"Every single person here who's looked at it says it's patently false," Obama said a news conference on Monday.
So where did the notion of a major welfare reform overhaul come from?
Where it didn't come from is Washington but rather from Utah, Nevada, California, Connecticut and Minnesota.
These states, some with Republican governors, asked the federal government for more flexibility in how they hand out welfare dollars. Their purpose was to spend less time on federal paperwork and more time experimenting with ways to connect welfare recipients with jobs.
The Obama administration cooperated, granting waivers to some states from some of the existing rules.

Jeeps that are being SOLD in China are being built in China. Try to figure out why.

As YOU were saying?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Partially true. The Obama administration is corporatist. Just look at Liz Fowler's Insurance and healthcare industry windfall tax. The republicans are just the same, only in different sectors. Neither represents the people of the US.

 

[Edgetho]

Texas 5th District - Election 2010 - The New York Times

I was watching Morning Joe and they had Congressman Jeb Hensarling from Texas 5th District.

This is no joke, he said Obama is for "big business" and the Republicans and him are trying to protect the poor and the middle class by stopping them from getting health insurance. HUH????

Look where he gets his money from. Banks and Insurance companies. And a third of the people in his district make less than $25 grand.

I believe one of the problems Republicans have is they still think they can stand up and lie right into a camera while talking to the American people and no one is going to "go look".

What sunk their last campaign were all the lies. About Obama ending the welfare work requirement, about moving manufacturing for jeeps sold in the US to China and so on.But this idea that the GOP is for the poor and middle class? Seriously? I bet even USMB Republicans don't defend that one. They might give it a go, but their hearts won't be in it.

News Flash about lie number one:



News Flash about lie number two.

How Obama has gutted welfare reform - Washington Post

The 1996 welfare reform law required that a portion of the able-bodied adults in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program — the successor to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program — work or prepare for work. Those work requirements were the heart of the reform’s success: Welfare rolls dropped by half, and the poverty rate for black children reached its lowest level in history in the years following.

But the Obama administration has jettisoned the law’s work requirements, asserting that, in the future, no state will be required to follow them. In place of the legislated work requirements, the administration has stated, it will unilaterally design its own “work” systems without congressional involvement or consent. Any state will be free to follow the new Obama requirements “in lieu of” the written statute.

You were saying!

You might consider using an actual news story instead of biased and untrue opinion. Have you ever considered that? It was Republican governors who asked Obama to waive the welfare work requirement. What do you think of that?

Fact check: Romney's welfare claims wrong - CNN.com

Clinton calls out 'disappointing' Romney ad
"Every single person here who's looked at it says it's patently false," Obama said a news conference on Monday.
So where did the notion of a major welfare reform overhaul come from?
Where it didn't come from is Washington but rather from Utah, Nevada, California, Connecticut and Minnesota.
These states, some with Republican governors, asked the federal government for more flexibility in how they hand out welfare dollars. Their purpose was to spend less time on federal paperwork and more time experimenting with ways to connect welfare recipients with jobs.
The Obama administration cooperated, granting waivers to some states from some of the existing rules.

Jeeps that are being SOLD in China are being built in China. Try to figure out why.

As YOU were saying?

That's an opinion piece from the Commie News Network. Which has been TOTALLY in the tank for obama since day one.

Now, here's another opinion piece from another In-The-Tank for obama lib rag.

But they differ...

How Obama has gutted welfare reform - Washington Post

To hear Bill Clinton tell it, there’s no truth to the charges that President Obama gutted welfare reform. The White House, fact-checkers and some journalists have said the same, playing down Obama’s decision to exempt states from the law’s work requirements.

Working closely with members of Congress, I helped draft the work requirements in the 1996 law, and I raised the alarm on July 12, when the Obama administration issued a bureaucratic order allowing states to waive those requirements. The law has indeed been gutted. Here’s how:

The 1996 welfare reform law required that a portion of the able-bodied adults in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program — the successor to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program — work or prepare for work. Those work requirements were the heart of the reform’s success: Welfare rolls dropped by half, and the poverty rate for black children reached its lowest level in history in the years following.

But the Obama administration has jettisoned the law’s work requirements, asserting that, in the future, no state will be required to follow them. In place of the legislated work requirements, the administration has stated, it will unilaterally design its own “work” systems without congressional involvement or consent. Any state will be free to follow the new Obama requirements “in lieu of” the written statute.

The administration has provided no historical evidence showing that Congress intended to grant the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or any part of the executive branch the authority to waive the TANF work requirements. The historical record is clear and states the opposite; as the summary of the reform prepared by Congress shortly after enactment plainly says: “Waivers granted after the date of enactment may not override provisions of the TANF law that concern mandatory work requirements.”

Edge:
dimocraps are lying scumbags.

All of them

 

[bodecea]

The GOP have officially gone insane.

Yep, and you got there way before they did.

So. You concede that the GOP has gone insane.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"The Middle Class has been buried these past four years" -- Joe Biden, Oct 2012, correctly describing the damage inflicted on the Middle class by this Administration

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Partially true. The Obama administration is corporatist. Just look at Liz Fowler's Insurance and healthcare industry windfall tax. The republicans are just the same, only in different sectors. Neither represents the people of the US.

Wait

Wait

Wait

Obama's Commerce Secretary forgot to report $80 million in income when she was being "Vetted"

 

[TooTall]

Texas 5th District - Election 2010 - The New York Times

I was watching Morning Joe and they had Congressman Jeb Hensarling from Texas 5th District.

This is no joke, he said Obama is for "big business" and the Republicans and him are trying to protect the poor and the middle class by stopping them from getting health insurance. HUH????

Look where he gets his money from. Banks and Insurance companies. And a third of the people in his district make less than $25 grand.

I believe one of the problems Republicans have is they still think they can stand up and lie right into a camera while talking to the American people and no one is going to "go look".

What sunk their last campaign were all the lies. About Obama ending the welfare work requirement, about moving manufacturing for jeeps sold in the US to China and so on.But this idea that the GOP is for the poor and middle class? Seriously? I bet even USMB Republicans don't defend that one. They might give it a go, but their hearts won't be in it.

News Flash about lie number one:



News Flash about lie number two.

How Obama has gutted welfare reform - Washington Post

The 1996 welfare reform law required that a portion of the able-bodied adults in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program — the successor to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program — work or prepare for work. Those work requirements were the heart of the reform’s success: Welfare rolls dropped by half, and the poverty rate for black children reached its lowest level in history in the years following.

But the Obama administration has jettisoned the law’s work requirements, asserting that, in the future, no state will be required to follow them. In place of the legislated work requirements, the administration has stated, it will unilaterally design its own “work” systems without congressional involvement or consent. Any state will be free to follow the new Obama requirements “in lieu of” the written statute.

You were saying!

Do you even read your own link? The Jeeps made in China are for the Chinese market.

No shit dick tracy! Wouldn't it be better if AMERICAN auto workers were building the Jeeps and shipping them to China? Instead, China gets the jobs and the free technology that was developed and paid for by Americans.

The point is you said this was about manufacturing jobs and I would require a link where someone said the Jeeps built there would be sold in the US.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Partially true. The Obama administration is corporatist. Just look at Liz Fowler's Insurance and healthcare industry windfall tax. The republicans are just the same, only in different sectors. Neither represents the people of the US.

Wait

Wait

Wait

Obama's Commerce Secretary forgot to report $80 million in income when she was being "Vetted"

Like Obama's evolution on gay marriage, the 80 million is simply a financial evolution.

 

[Asclepias]

I support none of the above.

And vote democrat, don't you? Now, how about cognitive dissonance

On occasion I vote for Dems and on occasions I vote GOP. On occasion I vote for Independents. I don't vote for ideological goose-steppers. I vote for my interests and the interests of the working Middle Class. I also vote for candidates who put their constituents over party and are firm believers in compromise. This vote requirement has been harder and harder to realize.

Thats an extremely hard concept for some people to digest. Politics has become a spectator sport where you are either a fan of the home team or the visitors. Rarely does common sense play into it.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Of course O is against the little man. This is obvious from his granting waivers to employers and not extending this to individuals. This is just one instance.