No government required

[Oddball]

You confuse poor with poverty. Poverty is defined in the US by Government.

Only arbitrarily..."Poverty" doesn't exist like a chair or a car...Therefore, it's an entirely subjective state.....And that's the point for the bureaucratic state: perpetual job security.

 

[Oddball]

there can be no black markets,without Government.

Entirely irrelevant to the fact that they are efficient and operate completely autonomously.....You claimed that laissez-faire can't work, and black markets are prime example of how it can and does work...That they wouldn't exist as black markets without the aggression of The State deeming them illegal is entirely beside the point.

 

[danielpalos]

You confuse poor with poverty. Poverty is defined in the US by Government.

Only arbitrarily..."Poverty" doesn't exist like a chair or a car...Therefore, it's an entirely subjective state.....And that's the point for the bureaucratic state: perpetual job security.

Poverty is defined in the US; poor is relative. A fallacy of composition.

 

[danielpalos]

there can be no black markets,without Government.

Entirely irrelevant to the fact that they are efficient and operate completely autonomously.....You claimed that laissez-faire can't work, and black markets are prime example of how it can and does work...That they wouldn't exist as black markets without the aggression of The State deeming them illegal is entirely beside the point.

Laissez-faire with or without Government. You only have fallacies of composition.

 

[Oddball]

Laissez-faire with or without Government. You only have fallacies of composition.

Irrelevancy is irrelevant.

 

[francoHFW]

The left hates this undeniable reality - but here is yet another example that the government is not needed for anything outside of the 18 specific enumerated powers the states delegate to them.

In July, Microsoft announced a “Rural Airband Initiative” to invest in partnerships with telecommunications companies to bring broadband connectivity to 2 million more people in rural America by 2022.

Business will always build the infrastructure necessary (and more efficiently and at a lower cost) because it will ultimately end in more sales or lower cost for them.

Microsoft’s Plan to Expand Broadband Would Benefit Rural Americans

2 million is a drop in the bucket whereas every other developed country has much better coverage than we do and much cheaper, dupe of the greedy idiot rich.

 

[Oddball]

Poverty is defined in the US; poor is relative. A fallacy of composition.

Can I borrow a bucket of "poverty" from you?...Promise I'll pay you back at the end of the month with a barrel of it.

 

[francoHFW]

The left hates this undeniable reality - but here is yet another example that the government is not needed for anything outside of the 18 specific enumerated powers the states delegate to them.

In July, Microsoft announced a “Rural Airband Initiative” to invest in partnerships with telecommunications companies to bring broadband connectivity to 2 million more people in rural America by 2022.

Business will always build the infrastructure necessary (and more efficiently and at a lower cost) because it will ultimately end in more sales or lower cost for them.

Microsoft’s Plan to Expand Broadband Would Benefit Rural Americans

2 million is a drop in the bucket whereas every other developed country has much better coverage than we do and much cheaper, dupe of the greedy idiot rich.

Not to mention Health Care Day Care Living wage good vacations and infrastructure, American Idiot.

 

[francoHFW]

Poverty is defined in the US; poor is relative. A fallacy of composition.

Can I borrow a bucket of "poverty" from you?...Promise I'll pay you back at the end of the month with a barrel of it.

More Poverty all the time... Thanks GOP. Worst upward mobility and inequality ever after 35 years of your failure and tax rates.

 

[Oddball]

Poverty is defined in the US; poor is relative. A fallacy of composition.

Can I borrow a bucket of "poverty" from you?...Promise I'll pay you back at the end of the month with a barrel of it.

More Poverty all the time... Thanks GOP. Worst upward mobility and inequality ever after 35 years of your failure and tax rates.

When I need your opinion, I'll give it to you...Now buzz off.

 

[danielpalos]

Laissez-faire with or without Government. You only have fallacies of composition.

Irrelevancy is irrelevant.

There can be no "black market" without Government. Can you explain, how a "black market" would develop, with no government?

 

[danielpalos]

Poverty is defined in the US; poor is relative. A fallacy of composition.

Can I borrow a bucket of "poverty" from you?...Promise I'll pay you back at the end of the month with a barrel of it.

Words are defined in dictionaries. Poverty is defined by our US Government.

 

[Oddball]

There can be no "black market" without Government. Can you explain, how a "black market" would develop, with no government?

Irrelevancy is still irrelevant.

What does that have to to with the fact that they are completely laissez-faire, and operating quite efficiently and effectively?.....Were there no interference by The State with free adults trading freely, then black markets would just be markets.....You're playing silly little semantic games that have no bearing on the global concept.

 

[Skull Pilot]

There can be no "black market" without Government. Can you explain, how a "black market" would develop, with no government?

Irrelevancy is still irrelevant.

What does that have to to with the fact that they are completely laissez-faire, and operating quite efficiently and effectively?.....Were there no interference by The State with free adults trading freely, then black markets would just be markets.....You're playing silly little semantic games that have no bearing on the global concept.

DP has been skull fucked simultaneously via both ears so many times he is legally mentally retarded

Don't waste you time arguing with him

 

[Oddball]

Words are defined in dictionaries. Poverty is defined by our US Government.

Another irrelevancy.....In order to have "poverty" there needs to be another equally nebulous concept (i.e. wealth and prosperity) against which to measure it....Therefore, irradicating "poverty" is just as much as a never-ending fool's errand as trying to eliminate "terrorism"....But that's the point; endless programs with endless streams of funding.

 

[danielpalos]

There can be no "black market" without Government. Can you explain, how a "black market" would develop, with no government?

Irrelevancy is still irrelevant.

What does that have to to with the fact that they are completely laissez-faire, and operating quite efficiently and effectively?.....Were there no interference by The State with free adults trading freely, then black markets would just be markets.....You're playing silly little semantic games that have no bearing on the global concept.

Black markets would be "playing a cat and mouse game" with Government. That increases costs and reduces efficiency. Anarcho-Capitalism, would be more efficient, in that case.

 

[danielpalos]

Words are defined in dictionaries. Poverty is defined by our US Government.

Another irrelevancy.....In order to have "poverty" there needs to be another equally nebulous concept (i.e. wealth and prosperity) against which to measure it....Therefore, irradicating "poverty" is just as much as a never-ending fool's errand as trying to eliminate "terrorism"....But that's the point; endless programs with endless streams of funding.

Poor is relative; poverty is has a specific meaning as Defined, by Government. That is the whole and entire difference.

 

[Oddball]

Black markets would be "playing a cat and mouse game" with Government. That increases costs and reduces efficiency. Anarcho-Capitalism, would be more efficient, in that case.

The costs are marginal, given the inherent inefficiency of The State.....I can think of no better example than legal marijuana being more costly and of no higher quality, than that acquired from the local hippie pot head.

Raising the stakes with even more State aggression (i.e. the drug war) only serves to squeeze out the more peaceful elements in favor of violent thugs, for whom life is cheap to begin with,

 

[Oddball]

Poor is relative; poverty is has a specific meaning as Defined, by Government. That is the whole and entire difference.

The terms are interchangeable in the literal world...That "poverty" has a specific (and malleable) meaning for The State, insofar as qualifying for its handouts, is another irrelevancy..

 

[danielpalos]

Black markets would be "playing a cat and mouse game" with Government. That increases costs and reduces efficiency. Anarcho-Capitalism, would be more efficient, in that case.

The costs are marginal, given the inherent inefficiency of The State.....I can think of no better example than legal marijuana being more costly and of no higher quality, than that acquired from the local hippie pot head.

Raising the stakes with even more State aggression (i.e. the drug war) only serves to squeeze out the more peaceful elements in favor of violent thugs, for whom life is cheap to begin with,

Caveat emptor would be the custom not an FDA label. Of course, Government increases some inefficiency for purely profit driven private sectors. Establishing goal posts, is what Government is for.

Poverty would be not being able to enter that sector, versus merely being poor in that sector instead of being very well funded, and competing with capitalists, who are very well funded.

Capitalism can flourish better, within the "goalposts" established by Government.

The issue is, Government is a form of socialism. Socialism requires social morals for free.

Consider that, if we were not in moral poverty, we would only need, Ten simple Commandments from a God, not the Expense of Government.