No agency examined DNC servers. But we are to believe that the Russians hacked the election.

[Constructive Anarchy]

I wonder if Angela Merkel, and dozens of other world leaders, were surprised to find out that US intelligence services were monitoring all their private communications? What do you think? Were they just pretending to be upset about it?

Again... Germany was so pissed that they helped the U.S. determine that it was Russia that hacked the DNC.

Again: Based on what evidence?

Based on what evidence? They compared the information given to them from when Russia hacked Germany... it's in the report...

Report? Is that what you call it? A report with no source and no evidence.

No source or evidence? Is that your final answer?

 

[Lewdog]

How is that off topic? How did the FBI know to warn the DNC that they were hacked by Russia if they didn't have access to the server? Then comes, who recommended CrowdStrike be hired?

You brought up CrowdStrike as the source of the report.

The question is simple enough. Who hired them, the DNC or the FBI?

Why the deflection?

I want to know why people on here think that by asking questions that no one is privy to the answer to suddenly means everything about the situation is invalid.

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

Why would hiring an outside contractor be classified? Especially if they were hired by the DNC?

Something's amiss here

Why are you asking who hired them if you are going to state that the DNC hired them?

 

[Lewdog]

How is that off topic? How did the FBI know to warn the DNC that they were hacked by Russia if they didn't have access to the server? Then comes, who recommended CrowdStrike be hired?

You brought up CrowdStrike as the source of the report.

The question is simple enough. Who hired them, the DNC or the FBI?

Why the deflection?

I want to know why people on here think that by asking questions that no one is privy to the answer to suddenly means everything about the situation is invalid.

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

How convenient. Any luck with finding the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?

Excuse me? That was under Republican President Bush... how many years ago?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

I'm looking for any update and can't find any. Is this some sort of monumentally bad ******* joke? What game is this shit all about?

"The FBI never examined the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers during its investigation into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, BuzzFeed reports.

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.

According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers."


FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report

I love the smell of Orange Butthurt in the evening...

 

[Lewdog]

Again... Germany was so pissed that they helped the U.S. determine that it was Russia that hacked the DNC.

Again: Based on what evidence?

Based on what evidence? They compared the information given to them from when Russia hacked Germany... it's in the report...

Report? Is that what you call it? A report with no source and no evidence.

No source or evidence? Is that your final answer?

Assange has zero credibility... has he released that info that is going to bring the CNN to its knee yet?

 

[Pop23]

You brought up CrowdStrike as the source of the report.

The question is simple enough. Who hired them, the DNC or the FBI?

Why the deflection?

I want to know why people on here think that by asking questions that no one is privy to the answer to suddenly means everything about the situation is invalid.

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

Why would hiring an outside contractor be classified? Especially if they were hired by the DNC?

Something's amiss here

Why are you asking who hired them if you are going to state that the DNC hired them?

That made zero sense. You are the one who said they were hired. I only ask, by whom?

 

[Lewdog]

I want to know why people on here think that by asking questions that no one is privy to the answer to suddenly means everything about the situation is invalid.

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

Why would hiring an outside contractor be classified? Especially if they were hired by the DNC?

Something's amiss here

Why are you asking who hired them if you are going to state that the DNC hired them?

That made zero sense. You are the one who said they were hired. I only ask, by whom?

Yes, I said they were hired... but I didn't say by whom. Someone else is asking that.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

Again: Based on what evidence?

Based on what evidence? They compared the information given to them from when Russia hacked Germany... it's in the report...

Report? Is that what you call it? A report with no source and no evidence.

No source or evidence? Is that your final answer?

Assange has zero credibility... has he released that info that is going to bring the CNN to its knee yet?

Assange says the e-mails could have been hacked by a fourteen year old. I'll bet that thought gives John Podesta a stiff boner.
Julian Assange Says a 'Kid Could Have Hacked Podesta' Emails

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

You brought up CrowdStrike as the source of the report.

The question is simple enough. Who hired them, the DNC or the FBI?

Why the deflection?

I want to know why people on here think that by asking questions that no one is privy to the answer to suddenly means everything about the situation is invalid.

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

How convenient. Any luck with finding the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?

Excuse me? That was under Republican President Bush... how many years ago?

Right. So how could the current administration possibly use intelligence for it's own political purposes? Boggles the mind doesn't it.

 

[Lewdog]

I want to know why people on here think that by asking questions that no one is privy to the answer to suddenly means everything about the situation is invalid.

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

How convenient. Any luck with finding the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?

Excuse me? That was under Republican President Bush... how many years ago?

Right. So how could the current administration possibly use intelligence for it's own political purposes? Boggles the mind doesn't it.

Except the FBI who helped Trump with their letter just a week before the election agrees with the assessment that the DNC was hacked by the Russians...

 

[Lewdog]

Based on what evidence? They compared the information given to them from when Russia hacked Germany... it's in the report...

Report? Is that what you call it? A report with no source and no evidence.

No source or evidence? Is that your final answer?

Assange has zero credibility... has he released that info that is going to bring the CNN to its knee yet?

Assange says the e-mails could have been hacked by a fourteen year old. I'll bet that thought gives John Podesta a stiff boner.
Julian Assange Says a 'Kid Could Have Hacked Podesta' Emails

Assange is a loser who is hiding out in an Embassy to avoid going to court for sexual assault.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

We should just take their word for it. Why even ask questions?

No, why ask questions that you know you can't get answered because it is Classified information that you aren't and will never be privy to?

How convenient. Any luck with finding the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?

Excuse me? That was under Republican President Bush... how many years ago?

Right. So how could the current administration possibly use intelligence for it's own political purposes? Boggles the mind doesn't it.

Except the FBI who helped Trump with their letter just a week before the election agrees with the assessment that the DNC was hacked by the Russians...

You just make yourself look more dishonest every time you answer.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

Report? Is that what you call it? A report with no source and no evidence.

No source or evidence? Is that your final answer?

Assange has zero credibility... has he released that info that is going to bring the CNN to its knee yet?

Assange says the e-mails could have been hacked by a fourteen year old. I'll bet that thought gives John Podesta a stiff boner.
Julian Assange Says a 'Kid Could Have Hacked Podesta' Emails

Assange is a loser who is hiding out in an Embassy to avoid going to court for sexual assault.

And Podesta is a pedophile. What about that?

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

It's really funny to watch so called liberals turn into neo-cons.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

If the Russians did hack DNC e-mails....we should thank them. Since we evidently can't rely on our own news media to report anything about anything. Gosh, I wonder what would have happened if Hilary had won? I wonder if anyone anywhere would have ever heard anything about Russians doing anything? My guess would be: No.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

I'm looking for any update and can't find any. Is this some sort of monumentally bad ******* joke? What game is this shit all about?

"The FBI never examined the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers during its investigation into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, BuzzFeed reports.

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.

According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers."


FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report

Trump, Russia and the U.S. Election - FactCheck.org

Multiple organizations studied the DNC servers.

I don't know I would want the FBI looking at my server when we know they are partisan and working to affect the outcome of the election. The FBI was the last to finally admit Russian hacking.

So many Russians on the USMB these days. Those cockroaches infest every thing they touch.

If I had my way, if I were dictator, the things I'd have done to the Clintons, Obama, Podesta, and the rest of the criminal gang, I'd make Trump look like Mother Teresa.

 

[Lakhota]

I'm looking for any update and can't find any. Is this some sort of monumentally bad ******* joke? What game is this shit all about?

"The FBI never examined the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers during its investigation into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, BuzzFeed reports.

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.

According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers."


FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report

I love the smell of Orange Butthurt in the evening...

Yeah, the new NaziCon tactic is to blame the DNC for the hacking - not Russia. Sane people know better - but the retards will buy it. It's no longer "the meek shall inherit the earth" - it's now "the stupid shall inherit the earth". We must change that scenario.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

I'm looking for any update and can't find any. Is this some sort of monumentally bad ******* joke? What game is this shit all about?

"The FBI never examined the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers during its investigation into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, BuzzFeed reports.

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.

According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers."


FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report

I love the smell of Orange Butthurt in the evening...

Yeah, the new NaziCon tactic is to blame the DNC for the hacking - not Russia. Sane people know better - but the retards will buy it. It's no longer "the meek shall inherit the earth" - it's now "the stupid shall inherit the earth". We must change that scenario.

What I want to know is: What did the CIA know, and when did they know it? And if they knew about it before the election, why didn't they do anything about it?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Actually I believe they were. It's just that Russia had its preference. You know, just like Dim Dong did.

How could they have preference if they tried to hack both parties?

I wonder why nobody, especially the Pogo types, seem to remember that.

Please, I beg you to make this easier for me.

Republican National Committee Security Foiled Russian Hackers

 

[TemplarKormac]

Republicans have suddenly become cyber-security experts lol

Well, in this context, they kinda are. Being the ones who weren't successfully hacked and all.

How do you know? Putin wanted Trump to win. Who knows what he might have on the GOP, and what he's waiting to use it for.

See previous response. It boggles the mind that certain liberals are absolutely immune to doing any research whatsoever.