Nick Fuentes Explained

[g5000]

Half truths and lies, and you know it. I expect it from idiots here - hate it when non morons say lies like this.
He was not an invited guest at Mar-A-Lago, He came with Kanye West, who Trump did invite. After the dinner Trump said he had no idea who he was, had a decent-quick exchange with him, noted he said little, certainly nothing controversial.
The question of that whole affair, was why on earth did Kanye bring him. He - SAYS - he did it to expose white nationalism to Trump. But, after all - Kanye is not exactly a sane person.

I doubt very much you didn't know this to be true before parroting the false narrative.

I have no doubt you are stupid enough to bleev Trump when he says he had no idea who Fuentes was.

You actually bleev his staff didn't tell him?

You actually bleev the Secret Service didn't vet Fuentes and tell him?

Just how profoundly stupid are you?!!?

 

[Correll]

Since you have expectations, then you have been paying attention to him. Or at least to what your propagandists say about him.

You are no different than anyone else.

I'm not following his words, giving him stature and relevance.

I am gleefully waiting to see him fail and fail miseribly, because leftism doesn't work.

 

[g5000]

I'm not following his words, giving him stature and relevance.

I am gleefully waiting to see him fail and fail miseribly, because leftism doesn't work.

Ah. So you are swallowing whatever your propagandists tell you about Mamdani.

Of course.

Of course.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I have no doubt you are stupid enough to bleev Trump when he says he had no idea who Fuentes was.

You actually bleev his staff didn't tell him?

You actually bleev the Secret Service didn't vet Fuentes and tell him?

Just how profoundly stupid are you?!!?

WHy would he know who he was way back then??
Of course you believe he was lying, because it feeds your hate.
I have no reason to believe Trump knew who he was, and it is widely known that he was not an invited guest. Kanye, and others there all said he wasn't.
The SS told Trump Kanye had a guest, Trump said let him in, but had no reason to think Kanye would do something like that.

 

[Captain Creeper]

His popularity w/the Republican base.

Confirmed by the lack of condemnation by the majority of the conservative movement in America.

The "base" is not uniform. There are plenty of salt of the earth folks who are loyal Trump supporters who (1) do not know who Fuentes is; (2) are not going to be into some Nancy boy; (3) are not going to be into neo-fascist, woman-hating ideology; and (4) want nothing to do with this little ****.

To be correct, your statement should be that he is popular with some of the Republican base. We can argue about the degree of his popularity, but I suspect that it is rather low. The current GOP is in total Schizoid mode today, in my opinion. There are the conservatives, who are broken down into the (1) moral conservatives and the (2) political/constitutional conservatives (I self-identify as the later. I do not care about moral issues so much because those matters should be left to the individual and disputes reserved for the courts. I am primarily concerned with monetary policy, national security, and conserving individual freedom and liberty)>

Then, with the coming of Trump, along with the Second Coming of Trump, we have taken a bizarre populist bent. I am uncomfortable with this generally because populism is necessarily relativistic, and that make for a good environment for avoiding accountability. I want a candidate to be bound by party platform so he/she can be held to account. Some of these folks are also moral conservatives. They are like the anti-Federalist society. But overall, they tend to be good people.

Fuentes is not part of the GOP. He is a whore pimping himself on the internet. Of course, if you get some guy on a soapbox ranting about how Hitler was misunderstood and yada yada, you are going to get a certain amount of people on his side. But this is far from the norm and general ethic of the the conservatives and the populists. Also, and to be perfectly candid, the people who glom to this sort of shit tend to be ignorant. To speculate wildly and with almost no data to back me up, I suspect that the Fuentes wing at one time may have represented, say 0.50% of the GOP. Today, it is far less, as the Fuentes effect has worn off. He only appeals to gay neo-Nazis today, I think.

 

[Captain Creeper]

The little Nazi is the leader of the "groyper" movement within the Republican Party, and he has been invited to many MAGA events, including AFPAC. He has also been embraced, literally, by many elected Republicans, including MTG.

He also had dinner with Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago.

He was given a platform to spew his vitriol by Tucker Carlson recently.

I used to be a little bit of a groper myself!

 

[g5000]

WHy would he know who he was way back then??

Way back then?

Fuentes has been around a long time and his Nazi beliefs were well known "back then".

Here's the Nazi at AFPAC being stroked by MTG just months before his dinner with Trump. THAT is how well known he was "back then".








.

Of course you believe he was lying, because it feeds your hate.
I have no reason to believe Trump knew who he was, and it is widely known that he was not an invited guest. Kanye, and others there all said he wasn't.
The SS told Trump Kanye had a guest, Trump said let him in, but had no reason to think Kanye would do something like that.

No one gets anywhere near a president or ex-president without being vetted by the staff and the Secret Service.

You cultists are as gullible as they come. If Trump spit in your ear and told you it was raining, you'd defend him to the death.



.

 

[MarcATL]

View attachment 1192101

Do you agree w/Fuentes?

 

[MarcATL]

The "base" is not uniform. There are plenty of salt of the earth folks who are loyal Trump supporters who (1) do not know who Fuentes is; (2) are not going to be into some Nancy boy; (3) are not going to be into neo-fascist, woman-hating ideology; and (4) want nothing to do with this little ****.

To be correct, your statement should be that he is popular with some of the Republican base. We can argue about the degree of his popularity, but I suspect that it is rather low. The current GOP is in total Schizoid mode today, in my opinion. There are the conservatives, who are broken down into the (1) moral conservatives and the (2) political/constitutional conservatives (I self-identify as the later. I do not care about moral issues so much because those matters should be left to the individual and disputes reserved for the courts. I am primarily concerned with monetary policy, national security, and conserving individual freedom and liberty)>

Then, with the coming of Trump, along with the Second Coming of Trump, we have taken a bizarre populist bent. I am uncomfortable with this generally because populism is necessarily relativistic, and that make for a good environment for avoiding accountability. I want a candidate to be bound by party platform so he/she can be held to account. Some of these folks are also moral conservatives. They are like the anti-Federalist society. But overall, they tend to be good people.

Fuentes is not part of the GOP. He is a whore pimping himself on the internet. Of course, if you get some guy on a soapbox ranting about how Hitler was misunderstood and yada yada, you are going to get a certain amount of people on his side. But this is far from the norm and general ethic of the the conservatives and the populists. Also, and to be perfectly candid, the people who glom to this sort of shit tend to be ignorant. To speculate wildly and with almost no data to back me up, I suspect that the Fuentes wing at one time may have represented, say 0.50% of the GOP. Today, it is far less, as the Fuentes effect has worn off. He only appeals to gay neo-Nazis today, I think.

Why aren't any prominent Republicans condemning Fuentes if he's so unpopular and unwanted in your party?

 

[Dekster]

White supremacist who says women shouldn't vote admits he's a virgin

Self-professed misogynist Nick Fuentes admitted he's a virgin and finds women annoying as he tried to defend his sexuality to Piers Morgan.

www.dailymail.co.uk

During an interview Nick Fuentes came out as a virgin. That's right, he's a 27 year old virgin. Wow! Now things are so much clearer!

The interviewer was Piers Morgan, who asked Fuentes if he is gay. He said he was not. Then, Fuentes revealed that (1) he is a virgin; (2) he really does not like women; and (3) doesn't think women should be allowed to vote, a basic civil right. In my book, this amounts to one thing: GAY. Fuentes then deems himself an "incel" (i.e., someone who claims to be "involuntarily celibate"). Of course, we all know what incel guys are like. They are all just one drink and one opportunity away from committing a rape, and possibly more. Rightwing or leftwing, these people are ticking timebombs.

In the case of Fuentes, it IS possible that his virginity in involuntary. With a personality like his, who would possibly want to bang him (except for other gay neo-Nazis)? Even if a guy truly hates women, he will at some point lie to get in some chick's pants. Not Fuentes. He points to his Catholic upbringing, and we all know that Catholics never sin, right?

It is my conclusion that Fuentes is a closeted homosexual, and that his political beliefs are the manifestation of his sexual frustration. Most of us on the right love to bang cooter!! We also like our women. We come by our political beliefs honestly, through reason shaped by experience. But with Fuentes, there is no telling what his true political beliefs are. I am betting that if he were honest with himself he is some sort of retarded democratic-socialist nonsense. He may even discover that he is a full-on communist once he gets past the neo-Nazi ideology he harbors. Democratic-socialism, Hitler-nationalist-socialism, communism, etc .. None of these toxic ideologies comport to individual freedom and liberty.

I question Fuentes's patriotism. I also question his sexuality. Further, I question his emotional stability. To use the scientific vernacular from psychiatry, Fuentes is "One Fucked Up Asshole".

Just another incel. No more; no less.

 

[theHawk]

White supremacist who says women shouldn't vote admits he's a virgin

Self-professed misogynist Nick Fuentes admitted he's a virgin and finds women annoying as he tried to defend his sexuality to Piers Morgan.

www.dailymail.co.uk

During an interview Nick Fuentes came out as a virgin. That's right, he's a 27 year old virgin. Wow! Now things are so much clearer!

The interviewer was Piers Morgan, who asked Fuentes if he is gay. He said he was not. Then, Fuentes revealed that (1) he is a virgin; (2) he really does not like women; and (3) doesn't think women should be allowed to vote, a basic civil right. In my book, this amounts to one thing: GAY. Fuentes then deems himself an "incel" (i.e., someone who claims to be "involuntarily celibate"). Of course, we all know what incel guys are like. They are all just one drink and one opportunity away from committing a rape, and possibly more. Rightwing or leftwing, these people are ticking timebombs.

In the case of Fuentes, it IS possible that his virginity in involuntary. With a personality like his, who would possibly want to bang him (except for other gay neo-Nazis)? Even if a guy truly hates women, he will at some point lie to get in some chick's pants. Not Fuentes. He points to his Catholic upbringing, and we all know that Catholics never sin, right?

It is my conclusion that Fuentes is a closeted homosexual, and that his political beliefs are the manifestation of his sexual frustration. Most of us on the right love to bang cooter!! We also like our women. We come by our political beliefs honestly, through reason shaped by experience. But with Fuentes, there is no telling what his true political beliefs are. I am betting that if he were honest with himself he is some sort of retarded democratic-socialist nonsense. He may even discover that he is a full-on communist once he gets past the neo-Nazi ideology he harbors. Democratic-socialism, Hitler-nationalist-socialism, communism, etc .. None of these toxic ideologies comport to individual freedom and liberty.

I question Fuentes's patriotism. I also question his sexuality. Further, I question his emotional stability. To use the scientific vernacular from psychiatry, Fuentes is "One Fucked Up Asshole".

Well, retard, he didn’t “come out” as a virgin. He has always stated this in his interviews when asked.

He is a practicing Christian and waiting for marriage.

Funny how lefties are losing their shit over this. They can’t believe someone isn’t a sexual degenerate like they are.

 

[theHawk]

Becasue he is an admitted white supremacist. and thus the left uses him to smear republicans and/or maga.

False. You failed to watch the interview with Piers. He specifically states he isn’t a White Supremacist. He believes all people and races are created equal in the eyes of God.

Having racial presences for girlfriends/wives and children isn’t racist. Recognizing blacks have much higher crime rates isn’t racist. But since lefties call that kind of preference as “racist”, Nick embraces it and says he is “racist” as lefties define it.

 

[Captain Creeper]

Why aren't any prominent Republicans condemning Fuentes if he's so unpopular and unwanted in your party?

Probably for the same reason Democrats don't condemn some of the disgusting bullshit its members do.

 

[Captain Creeper]

Why aren't any prominent Republicans condemning Fuentes if he's so unpopular and unwanted in your party?

Also, we are not going to jump just to please the left.

 

[MarcATL]

Probably for the same reason Democrats don't condemn some of the disgusting bullshit its members do.

Which is what exactly...? Spit it out!

 

[SaxonJackson]

Fuentes has some good things to say and some idiotic things to say. I watched a few of his podcasts but I'm not entirely impressed. He is articulate and he seems to do his homework but he's also a bit quick to attack other, very conservative podcasters like Ian Carroll. He also attacked MTG recently which was pretty uncalled for. Generally speaking, I think he's a bit like Trump. He likes to hear himself talk and he thinks that he's 100% right and everyone else is 100% wrong. Overall? Meh?

 

[Lockback]

The little Nazi is the leader of the "groyper" movement within the Republican Party, and he has been invited to many MAGA events, including AFPAC. He has also been embraced, literally, by many elected Republicans, including MTG.

He also had dinner with Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago.

He was given a platform to spew his vitriol by Tucker Carlson recently.

The Democrats are the normal ones, right?

 

[Correll]

Ah. So you are swallowing whatever your propagandists tell you about Mamdani.

Of course.

Of course.

The pattern of far left rule of our cities, is clear.

That is not something some talking heads are telling me. I can see it in my own life.

YOur need to ignore me and my words, is a defense mechanism.

 

[Correll]

False. You failed to watch the interview with Piers. He specifically states he isn’t a White Supremacist. He believes all people and races are created equal in the eyes of God.

Having racial presences for girlfriends/wives and children isn’t racist. Recognizing blacks have much higher crime rates isn’t racist. But since lefties call that kind of preference as “racist”, Nick embraces it and says he is “racist” as lefties define it.

If you say so. I've still heard nothing that suggests he is not primarily just a tool of the left.

 

[TimFitz]

No, I think that is a bridge too far. He is no more representative of the GOP than the Ayatollah Mamdani is representative of the DNC.

Five million Trumpsters listened to him with Carlson.

And he has million followers on the Trump right’s social media sewer, X.