New York Times: Trump "could have ordered the release of the files without an act of Congress, and has not"

[Nostra]

Yup

Prove it.

 

[Catman51]

I didn’t say he did that. Spending hours with a victim makes him a suspect though.

And spending any time attacking h9im for th9ngs y0ou admit he did not do makes you a liar and beneath contempt.

 

[Catman51]

View attachment 1185575
Someone claims it, in your world it's true. But I heard he likes old white men. But in your loons world, anything goes.

Projection of your own inadequacies.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Yeah, but there is no suspicion that Joe Biden screwed little girls

^!!!!!!!!^

 

[jknowgood]

Projection of your own inadequacies.

You sound like a homophobe.

 

[Hellbilly]

But Obama screwed little boys and Biden was busy doing his daughter.

False

 

[jknowgood]

False

No, I'm right.

 

[Hellbilly]

No, I'm right.

Quiet, piggy

 

[toobfreak]

Did you know Trump can instruct his DOJ to release the Epstein without wasting Congress ' time?

Doesn't that mean that JOE BIDEN could have likewise ordered the files released anytime he wanted in 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 as well, Genius? And wouldn't that have been the more prudent of the actions seeing that Epstein had just suicided himself?

 

[jknowgood]

Quiet, piggy

Those Epstein files aren't doing so well for your party

 

[Hellbilly]

Those Epstein files aren't doing so well for your party

What party?

 

[jknowgood]

What party?

Democrat party.

 

[Hellbilly]

Democrat party.

Another fool that thinks I’m a democrat.

 

[OODA_Loop]

He's playing some kind of game. For whatever reason, he still doesn't want that info out.

And we'll never see all of it.

This is the setup for the pivot for when its released and its does not contain what you claim.

 

[BluesLegend]

New York Times: Trump "could have ordered the release of the files without an act of Congress, and has not"​

^^^ more lies from the left. Hey dumbass from Georgia, why do you think it took an act of congress to release the files? When you pull your sheeple head out of your ass and go find the answer to that question I give you permission to return.

 

[Mac1958]

This is the setup for the pivot for when its released and its does not contain what you claim.

What have I claimed will be there, exactly?

You'll have to lie now, so make it a GOOD one.

Silly Trumpster.

 

[OODA_Loop]

What have I claimed will be there, exactly?

You'll have to lie now, so make it a GOOD one.

Silly Trumpster.

Some implication of Trump

 

[Mac1958]

Some implication of Trump

As I predicted. Play with someone else.

 

[Nostra]

What have I claimed will be there, exactly?

You'll have to lie now, so make it a GOOD one.

Silly Trumpster.

While nothing is set in stone, it's looking more likely that whatever materials the DOJ has may soon be released, after being in the DOJ/FBI hands for a long time.

So I have a theoretical-only, purely conspiratorial question: Would you mind if the FBI/DOJ went through the materials and removed/redacted/altered any information or evidence that might paint Trump in a bad light, or worse, indicate that he may have broken some law, before releasing them? Would that be worth it to you in the big picture of making America Great Again?

Personal insults are fine, but hopefully we'll get some clear answers one way or the other.

DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Government Will “Redact Every Republican” While “Leav[ing] All the Liberal, Democratic People” on the Epstein Client List

 

[Catman51]

You sound like a homophobe.

You sound like you were just caught.