New York Times: Lester Holt Helped Hillary

[Pumpkin Row]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

He helped her by bringing facts.
Facts have a well-known Liberal bias.

Lies have a much more well known Liberal bias.

Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.

How is bringing facts and pushing for an actual answer being unfair? Hillary was pushed and she was able to answer (even in spite of the orange fluff doll interrupting her constantly, between drinks of water).

Bringing facts was unfair because The Don don't need to stinkin' facts.
How was he supposed to know it was going to be that sort of debate?
He brought his rally slogans thinking that would be enough...completely unfair...many many people are saying it...many people...believe me.

It wasn't that sort of debate, though. He couldn't make up quite as many lies as Hillary because he didn't practice as much. Poor Oompa Loopma.

 

[idb]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

He helped her by bringing facts.
Facts have a well-known Liberal bias.

Lies have a much more well known Liberal bias.

Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.

You seem to be mixing up facts and propaganda, but that's normal for a Liberal. It's okay, I'm here to correct you.

Maybe I am...correct away!

 

[Pumpkin Row]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

He helped her by bringing facts.
Facts have a well-known Liberal bias.

Lies have a much more well known Liberal bias.

Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.

You seem to be mixing up facts and propaganda, but that's normal for a Liberal. It's okay, I'm here to correct you.

Maybe I am...correct away!

I already did. Liberals have no facts, they have propaganda. You're welcome.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Trump won with NAFTA reply.

Trump won with jobs to China.

Trump won with jobs to Mexico.

Trump won with Iran threat.

Trump won with the Iran bribe $ payoff.

Trump won by not using pre-staged notes.

Trump won by being himself vs. the staged note reading robot.

Trump won by his Fed rigged interest rates remarks.

Trump won by stating the truth about Saudi-Arabia (and other nations with their free rides)

Trump won by the restricted questions diversions from real issues.

Trump won in his comback reply to the so called “Cyber Threat” set-up question (400lbs and all)

Trump won with his ISIS tag on Clinton.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump was a blubbering buffoon that was drinking water like he'd just crossed the Sahara.

 

[idb]

He helped her by bringing facts.
Facts have a well-known Liberal bias.

Lies have a much more well known Liberal bias.

Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.

You seem to be mixing up facts and propaganda, but that's normal for a Liberal. It's okay, I'm here to correct you.

Maybe I am...correct away!

I already did. Liberals have no facts, they have propaganda. You're welcome.

Ah...now I understand.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Lies have a much more well known Liberal bias.

Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.

You seem to be mixing up facts and propaganda, but that's normal for a Liberal. It's okay, I'm here to correct you.

Maybe I am...correct away!

I already did. Liberals have no facts, they have propaganda. You're welcome.

Ah...now I understand.

I highly doubt it, but I'll just go ahead and pretend you learned something, despite knowing Liberals are incapable of doing so<3

 

[easyt65]

Of course he did...no one should expect less from almost every debate moderator.

 

[idb]

Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.

You seem to be mixing up facts and propaganda, but that's normal for a Liberal. It's okay, I'm here to correct you.

Maybe I am...correct away!

I already did. Liberals have no facts, they have propaganda. You're welcome.

Ah...now I understand.

I highly doubt it, but I'll just go ahead and pretend you learned something, despite knowing Liberals are incapable of doing so<3

No, I fully understand....and you've just helped me understand some more.

 

[ptbw forever]

You sound like a sexist piece of shit.

I guess the reference went straight over your head. Saying that a male got their butt kicked by a girl is like saying that they are so ineffective that they can be beat by anyone.

Does that make me a sexist? Depends on who you ask. Apparently, to an easily offended pansy such as yourself, I am.

**** off ya goddamn pedant, go please purists.

The irony here is crazy.

Here you are masquerading as a supposed progressive Democrat using ancient patriarchal inclined idioms, and I am calling you out on it as a very anti pc Republican.

Never claimed to be anything other than an Independent, and have been for a very long time. Sometimes, on occasion (but rare), I will see a Republican that I agree with, and on occasion (with more frequency than I agree with Republicans), I will find a Democrat that I strongly disagree with. Wasserman Schultz is one of those Dems that I would like to see crawl back under a rock.

As far as using the patriarchal idioms? WTF do you expect? I'm a country boy from Montana who joined the Navy as soon as I graduated and retired in 2002. I calls 'em as I sees 'em, and I don't really care if I'm PC or not.

You are really dumb then.

Hillary is Debbie Wasserman Schultz, just like all Democrat politicians on the national level.

Democrats also don't give a shit about "country boys".

Like I said...............I'm an Independent.

And, I really don't care if Dems don't give a shit about country boys or not.

Why? I really don't give a shit about your opinion.

You are an "Independent" who would vote for a Democrat shill over a real Independent candidate.

 

[Esmeralda]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

Lester Holt is a registered Republican.

 

[Esmeralda]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

Did it sound rehearsed at times? Incredible how he started off with Hillary's talking points and other times just happened to lead the way for Hillary's comebacks. The word, "scripted", comes to mind. Nothing would surprise me when it comes to Hillary's camp. It was reported that she was rehearsing for the debate up to the last minute. Maybe she actually was reading from a script. She's not quick on her feet and doesn't handle surprises well. That alone disqualifies her for president. You've got to be prepared for anything and she clearly is not.

When Trump mentioned that she isn't presidential, Holt quickly reminded him she was the first woman candidate, which did make it sound like Trump was being sexist. Her behavior isn't presidential. But the left knows how to vilify people by making asinine accusations to sway the public. They did it by blaming racism when people disagreed with any of Obama's policies and now they are blaming sexism if someone criticizes Hillary.

If a guy wore some of the horrendous outfits we've seen her in lately, they'd be raked over the coals. We should treat her the same way. To treat her with kid gloves because she is a woman would be sexist. Trump was treating her like he would a guy. Isn't that equality?

There was no guessing as to which side Holt was on from the start.

So it was all a big conspiracy against poor little ol' Donny Trump? Did you know Lester Holt is a registered Republican?

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump won with NAFTA reply.

Trump won with jobs to China.

Trump won with jobs to Mexico.

Trump won with Iran threat.

Trump won with the Iran bribe $ payoff.

Trump won by not using pre-staged notes.

Trump won by being himself vs. the staged note reading robot.

Trump won by his Fed rigged interest rates remarks.

Trump won by stating the truth about Saudi-Arabia (and other nations with their free rides)

Trump won by the restricted questions diversions from real issues.

Trump won in his comback reply to the so called “Cyber Threat” set-up question (400lbs and all)

Trump won with his ISIS tag on Clinton.

The majority of voters do not agree with you.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Trump won with NAFTA reply.

Trump won with jobs to China.

Trump won with jobs to Mexico.

Trump won with Iran threat.

Trump won with the Iran bribe $ payoff.

Trump won by not using pre-staged notes.

Trump won by being himself vs. the staged note reading robot.

Trump won by his Fed rigged interest rates remarks.

Trump won by stating the truth about Saudi-Arabia (and other nations with their free rides)

Trump won by the restricted questions diversions from real issues.

Trump won in his comback reply to the so called “Cyber Threat” set-up question (400lbs and all)

Trump won with his ISIS tag on Clinton.

The majority of voters do not agree with you.

This one does!

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump complains that his debate mic was 'defective'

Poor leetle donnie....

Oh, let's see: everything is against him, poor guy. The moderator (a Republican) was a left wing plant. The mic was defective. Hillary had the questions a week ahead of time.

We will soon see, after he loses the election, how there was a ton of voter fraud that kept him from winning. Pathetic.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump was a blubbering buffoon that was drinking water like he'd just crossed the Sahara.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump complains that his debate mic was 'defective'

Poor leetle donnie....

Oh, let's see: everything is against him, poor guy. The moderator (a Republican) was a left wing plant. The mic was defective. Hillary had the questions a week ahead of time.

We will soon see, after he loses the election, how there was a ton of voter fraud that kept him from winning. Pathetic.

Amazing how that "defective" mic was able to clearly pick up all Trump's snorting!!!!

 

[frigidweirdo]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

Wow, so one statement based on an opinion of facts is helping Hillary?

Hillary stood up there and answered the questions and got repeatedly interrupted by Trump, she did her job as Trump did his. Why you're looking for excuses for Trump I don't know.

 

[Esmeralda]

Trump won with NAFTA reply.

Trump won with jobs to China.

Trump won with jobs to Mexico.

Trump won with Iran threat.

Trump won with the Iran bribe $ payoff.

Trump won by not using pre-staged notes.

Trump won by being himself vs. the staged note reading robot.

Trump won by his Fed rigged interest rates remarks.

Trump won by stating the truth about Saudi-Arabia (and other nations with their free rides)

Trump won by the restricted questions diversions from real issues.

Trump won in his comback reply to the so called “Cyber Threat” set-up question (400lbs and all)

Trump won with his ISIS tag on Clinton.

The majority of voters do not agree with you.

This one does!

I think Michael Moore is a jackass. I never have liked him. He's an agenda freak: everything he has done, all his so called reporting, has been done to fit his personal agenda. If you are a real reporter, you look for the truth not what fits your agenda.

I can't stand him. So anything he tweets has no meaning for me.

You apparently think he is left wing, and you think I'm left wing, so you assume I like him. You're making an ass out of yourself with such an assumption.

 

[tyroneweaver]

"The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”

Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.

I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html

Did it sound rehearsed at times? Incredible how he started off with Hillary's talking points and other times just happened to lead the way for Hillary's comebacks. The word, "scripted", comes to mind. Nothing would surprise me when it comes to Hillary's camp. It was reported that she was rehearsing for the debate up to the last minute. Maybe she actually was reading from a script. She's not quick on her feet and doesn't handle surprises well. That alone disqualifies her for president. You've got to be prepared for anything and she clearly is not.

When Trump mentioned that she isn't presidential, Holt quickly reminded him she was the first woman candidate, which did make it sound like Trump was being sexist. Her behavior isn't presidential. But the left knows how to vilify people by making asinine accusations to sway the public. They did it by blaming racism when people disagreed with any of Obama's policies and now they are blaming sexism if someone criticizes Hillary.

If a guy wore some of the horrendous outfits we've seen her in lately, they'd be raked over the coals. We should treat her the same way. To treat her with kid gloves because she is a woman would be sexist. Trump was treating her like he would a guy. Isn't that equality?

There was no guessing as to which side Holt was on from the start.

That was hillary Clinton???
I could have sworn it was Rickie Fowler