New tool for dems to fight guns...require gun liability insurance.

Invisibleflash

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2019
1,979
1,628
1,940
Born L.A.-NYC is 2nd home-Rustbelt is home base
New tool for dems to fight guns...require unaffordable / unattainable gun liability insurance.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, whose city was home to two of the three people killed by a gunman at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, proposed Monday to make San Jose the nation’s first community to require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

San Jose mayor responds to gun violence - wants to require owners to carry liability insurance

I dunno if that's a major thing.

We'll have to see what percentage of legally owned guns are used in situations where insurance would help out.

On a related note, if I shoot someone accidentally in my home does my homeowners pay out already?
 
New tool for dems to fight guns...require unaffordable / unattainable gun liability insurance.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, whose city was home to two of the three people killed by a gunman at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, proposed Monday to make San Jose the nation’s first community to require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

San Jose mayor responds to gun violence - wants to require owners to carry liability insurance

A truly dumb idea since criminals and mentally deranged people doesn't respect laws in the first place, they will continue to shoot people, while law abiding people who own guns are the ones who would suffer. These laws have ZERO deterrence to mass killings as killers are not guided by laws of conduct, they are guided by criminal conduct or by mental problems.

Try the prevention idea of of stopping mass murders BEFORE they can happen, which are mainly done by people who are mentally ill or drugged up people. Most mass killers left a trail of warnings before hand that were ignored or not taken seriously.

Gun grabbers always ignore this part.
 
Last edited:
"New"?
Liberals have been squawking about this for decades.
Fact is...
Your home/rental liability policy will cover accidents, and NO policy will cover criminals acts.

This is just another way the anti-gun loons seek to make it harder for the law abiding to exercise their rights.
 
New tool for dems to fight guns...require unaffordable / unattainable gun liability insurance.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, whose city was home to two of the three people killed by a gunman at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, proposed Monday to make San Jose the nation’s first community to require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

San Jose mayor responds to gun violence - wants to require owners to carry liability insurance
We should have voter liability insurance too because politicians are ruining this country and the people who vote them in should have to pay up
 
New tool for dems to fight guns...require unaffordable / unattainable gun liability insurance.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, whose city was home to two of the three people killed by a gunman at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, proposed Monday to make San Jose the nation’s first community to require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

San Jose mayor responds to gun violence - wants to require owners to carry liability insurance

A truly dumb idea since criminals and mentally deranged people doesn't respect laws in the first place, they will continue to shoot people, while law abiding people who own guns are the ones who would suffer. These laws have ZERO deterrence to mass killings as killers are not guided by laws of conduct, they are guided by criminal conduct or by mental problems.

Try the prevention idea of of stopping mass murders BEFORE they can happen, which are mainly done by people who are mentally ill or drugged up people. Most mass killers left a trail of warnings before hand that were ignored or not taken seriously.

Gun grabbers always ignore this part.



Amazingly, all gun laws are directed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

That's how crazy Liberals are.
 
Lol libstains are so pathetic. It always comes down to laws and we all know if a criminal wants to break that law they will.
 
New tool for dems to fight guns...require unaffordable / unattainable gun liability insurance.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, whose city was home to two of the three people killed by a gunman at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, proposed Monday to make San Jose the nation’s first community to require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

San Jose mayor responds to gun violence - wants to require owners to carry liability insurance
The latest Fascist idea.
 
Cuomo has been floating this idea in New York (thankfully it hasn't gained any real traction yet). He proposes to require $1 million in insurance for gun owners. Literally trying to make it too expensive to own a firearm. Yet he wonders why Upstate can't stand him.....
 
Cuomo has been floating this idea in New York (thankfully it hasn't gained any real traction yet). He proposes to require $1 million in insurance for gun owners. Literally trying to make it too expensive to own a firearm. Yet he wonders why Upstate can't stand him.....
Yet the stupid bastards keep electing him, or so we are told.
 
Cuomo has been floating this idea in New York (thankfully it hasn't gained any real traction yet). He proposes to require $1 million in insurance for gun owners. Literally trying to make it too expensive to own a firearm. Yet he wonders why Upstate can't stand him.....
Yet the stupid bastards keep electing him, or so we are told.

New York City keeps electing him. Last time Cuomo lost 39 of 42 counties outside NYC yet won the election solely because of the city. It's tough when one city can essentially override the will of the rest of the state.
 
New tool for dems to fight guns...require unaffordable / unattainable gun liability insurance.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, whose city was home to two of the three people killed by a gunman at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, proposed Monday to make San Jose the nation’s first community to require gun owners to carry liability insurance.

San Jose mayor responds to gun violence - wants to require owners to carry liability insurance
The thread premise is a lie.

There’s nothing in the linked article having anything to do with Democrats, nor is there any evidence that the insurance will be either too expensive or unattainable.

This fails as a strawman fallacy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top