New Study Contradicts Man-made warming

[Sinatra]

Fascinating study from the University of Milwaukee which appears to heavily contradict man as a significant factor in determining the earth's climate - in fact, the study points to a shift from warming to cooling starting around the year 2000. This should have been far bigger news - but so far, the attention has been minimal by the mainstream media. Go figure...

Link to news articles on the study, dubbed "synchronized chaos" :

Climate Change - Who's Fault? Or No-Fault? - Digital Journal: Your News Network


UW-Milwaukee Study Could Realign Climate Change Theory - Milwaukee Weather News Story - WISN Milwaukee

 

[elvis]

Fascinating study from the University of Milwaukee which appears to heavily contradict man as a significant factor in determining the earth's climate - in fact, the study points to a shift from warming to cooling starting around the year 2000. This should have been far bigger news - but so far, the attention has been minimal by the mainstream media. Go figure...

Link to news articles on the study, dubbed "synchronized chaos" :

Climate Change - Who's Fault? Or No-Fault? - Digital Journal: Your News Network


UW-Milwaukee Study Could Realign Climate Change Theory - Milwaukee Weather News Story - WISN Milwaukee

The millwrights will not agree.

 

[HUGGY]

Fascinating study from the University of Milwaukee which appears to heavily contradict man as a significant factor in determining the earth's climate - in fact, the study points to a shift from warming to cooling starting around the year 2000. This should have been far bigger news - but so far, the attention has been minimal by the mainstream media. Go figure...

Link to news articles on the study, dubbed "synchronized chaos" :

Climate Change - Who's Fault? Or No-Fault? - Digital Journal: Your News Network


UW-Milwaukee Study Could Realign Climate Change Theory - Milwaukee Weather News Story - WISN Milwaukee

I watched a documentery on glaciers a couple of nights ago and they did time lapse photo studies on several major ice shelves and glaciers. You are missinformed, ignorant or a blatant liar.

 

[Sinatra]

Fascinating study from the University of Milwaukee which appears to heavily contradict man as a significant factor in determining the earth's climate - in fact, the study points to a shift from warming to cooling starting around the year 2000. This should have been far bigger news - but so far, the attention has been minimal by the mainstream media. Go figure...

Link to news articles on the study, dubbed "synchronized chaos" :

Climate Change - Who's Fault? Or No-Fault? - Digital Journal: Your News Network


UW-Milwaukee Study Could Realign Climate Change Theory - Milwaukee Weather News Story - WISN Milwaukee

I watched a documentery on glaciers a couple of nights ago and they did time lapse photo studies on several major ice shelves and glaciers. You are missinformed, ignorant or a blatant liar.

First, I assume you mean to say that the scientists in the linked study are misinformed, ignorant, or blatant liars.

Second, perhaps you should enhance your understanding of the earth's climate so as not to base it entirely on a show about shelving glaciers, as that might leave you misinformed, ignorant, of even capable of being a blatant liar...

You are aware of course that the antarctic shelving is primarily focused on a part of the western portion of the contienent, yes? An area specifically known as the Wilkins Shelf. While some warming has in fact occurred there, the vast majority of the Antarctic continent - about 95% of it - has cooled, and that the net impact of this cooling on sea levels will be to lower them. As for the Wilkins Shelf, its ice has already reformed since those now infamous 2008 viewings - but that does not make for nearly as good television now does it?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/media_credibility_not_ice_caps_1.html

 

[Midnight Marauder]

I watched a documentery on glaciers a couple of nights ago and they did time lapse photo studies on several major ice shelves and glaciers. You are missinformed, ignorant or a blatant liar.

I saw on TV a couple of nights ago where several people had their atoms scrambled, and they disappeared without any smoke or anything. Turns out, they were in a ship that was in orbit, and they reassembled intact on the planet below! They called it "beaming down" and I know it works, I SAW it!

 

[Sinatra]

I watched a documentery on glaciers a couple of nights ago and they did time lapse photo studies on several major ice shelves and glaciers. You are missinformed, ignorant or a blatant liar.

I saw on TV a couple of nights ago where several people had their atoms scrambled, and they disappeared without any smoke or anything. Turns out, they were in a ship that was in orbit, and they reassembled intact on the planet below! They called it "beaming down" and I know it works, I SAW it!

Awesome!

You have destroyed HUGGY in one fell swoop!

Now all that is left is for McCoy to declare Huggy is...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQwHwP0ojI&feature=related]YouTube - He's dead, Jim![/ame]

 

[Old Rocks]

Fascinating study from the University of Milwaukee which appears to heavily contradict man as a significant factor in determining the earth's climate - in fact, the study points to a shift from warming to cooling starting around the year 2000. This should have been far bigger news - but so far, the attention has been minimal by the mainstream media. Go figure...

Link to news articles on the study, dubbed "synchronized chaos" :

Climate Change - Who's Fault? Or No-Fault? - Digital Journal: Your News Network


UW-Milwaukee Study Could Realign Climate Change Theory - Milwaukee Weather News Story - WISN Milwaukee

I watched a documentery on glaciers a couple of nights ago and they did time lapse photo studies on several major ice shelves and glaciers. You are missinformed, ignorant or a blatant liar.

First, I assume you mean to say that the scientists in the linked study are misinformed, ignorant, or blatant liars.

Second, perhaps you should enhance your understanding of the earth's climate so as not to base it entirely on a show about shelving glaciers, as that might leave you misinformed, ignorant, of even capable of being a blatant liar...

You are aware of course that the antarctic shelving is primarily focused on a part of the western portion of the contienent, yes? An area specifically known as the Wilkins Shelf. While some warming has in fact occurred there, the vast majority of the Antarctic continent - about 95% of it - has cooled, and that the net impact of this cooling on sea levels will be to lower them. As for the Wilkins Shelf, its ice has already reformed since those now infamous 2008 viewings - but that does not make for nearly as good television now does it?

American Thinker: Media Credibility, Not Ice Caps, In Meltdown

You have been called on this idiocy many times. American Thinker is a wingnut site. Here is what NASA has to say about the warming in Antarctica;

For a long time, it seemed that Antarctica was immune to global warming. Most of the icy southern continent, where temperatures can plummet to minus 80 degrees Celsius (-112 degrees Fahrenheit), seemed to be holding steady or even cooling as the rest of the planet warmed. But a new analysis of satellite and weather station data has shown that Antarctica has warmed at a rate of about 0.12 degrees Celsius (0.22 degrees F) per decade since 1957, for a total average temperature rise of 0.5 degrees Celsius (1 degree F).
This image, based on the analysis of weather station and satellite data, shows the continent-wide warming trend from 1957 through 2006. Dark red over West Antarctica reflects that the region warmed most per decade. Most of the rest of the continent is orange, indicating a smaller warming trend, or white, where no change was observed. The underlying land surface color is based on the Landsat Image Mosaic of Antarctica (LIMA) data set, while the topography is from a Radarsat-based digital elevation model. Sea ice extent in the Southern Ocean surrounding the continent is based on data from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSR-E) collected on May 14, 2008 (late fall in the Southern Hemisphere).
The image paints a different picture of temperature trends in Antarctica than scientists had previously observed. Limited weather station measurements had recorded a dramatic warming trend along the peninsula, which juts into warmer waters in the Southern Ocean, but the few stations that dotted the rest of the continent reported that temperatures there had not changed or had cooled. It has been difficult to get a clear picture of temperature trends throughout Antarctica because measurements are so scarce. Few weather stations exist, and most of these are near the coast where they are relatively accessible. These coastal locations left vast regions of the continent’s interior where the temperature has never been monitored routinely. Satellites can measure the ground temperature of the entire continent, but only on clear days, when clouds don't obscure the view. Since satellite measurements are always taken in the same sort of weather conditions, they can be skewed.

Antarctic Warming Trends : Image of the Day

 

[Old Rocks]

I watched a documentery on glaciers a couple of nights ago and they did time lapse photo studies on several major ice shelves and glaciers. You are missinformed, ignorant or a blatant liar.

I saw on TV a couple of nights ago where several people had their atoms scrambled, and they disappeared without any smoke or anything. Turns out, they were in a ship that was in orbit, and they reassembled intact on the planet below! They called it "beaming down" and I know it works, I SAW it!

Awesome!

You have destroyed HUGGY in one fell swoop!

Now all that is left is for McCoy to declare Huggy is...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQwHwP0ojI&feature=related]YouTube - He's dead, Jim![/ame]

First rate replies from first rate idiots.

 

[Chris]

CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.

That has not changed.

We continue to pump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.

We are in the down side of the solar cycle, so it is a little cooler than it has been. In a few years things will heat up again.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.

That has not changed.

We continue to pump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.

We are in the down side of the solar cycle, so it is a little cooler than it has been. In a few years things will heat up again.

With NO influence at all by mankind.

 

[elvis]

CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.

That has not changed.

We continue to pump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.

We are in the down side of the solar cycle, so it is a little cooler than it has been. In a few years things will heat up again.

With NO influence at all by mankind.

He is going to report you to Papa Al.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

First rate replies from first rate idiots.

The only first rate idiot, besides yourself of course, who replied was Huggy Bear.

I see and will note for the record, you have no reply to the new scientific study from the scientists at the University of Milwaukee.

The scientists there who correctly point out that "global warming (AGW)" is science fiction, not science?

 

[elvis]

First rate replies from first rate idiots.

The only first rate idiot, besides yourself of course, who replied was Huggy Bear.

I see and will note for the record, you have no reply to the new scientific study from the scientists at the University of Milwaukee.

The scientists there who correctly point out that "global warming (AGW)" is science fiction, not science?

They don't count. They don't agree with Al Whore.

 

[Chris]

CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.

We have increased CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.

We continue to pump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year.

None of this has been disproven.

 

[elvis]

CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.

We have increased CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.

We continue to pump billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year.

None of this has been disproven.

No one has proved it to be man-made either.

 

[Dr Grump]

No one has proved it to be man-made either.

I disagree. I think if you put a lot of shit in the air and traps heat. That is a fact. Now unless the Flying Spagetti Monster is creating all the shit that goes into the atmosphere, I'd say humans are responsible.

I've been on messageboards for the best part of seven years and had this argument so many times (and produced the evidence), I'll be blowed if I'm gonna do it again. What I will say is this: 99 percent of climatologists (not scientists of varying backgrounds, but the scientists who specialise in the climate) agree with me (re humans causing the problem). That's all I need to say on the subject. Bring out your Medicine Men, and they can sell you your bottle of Dr Good, but if you wanna put your head in the sand have at it. Just remember to tell your grandkids, when they inherit this place, what you did to stop it...

 

[elvis]

No one has proved it to be man-made either.

I disagree. I think if you put a lot of shit in the air and traps heat. That is a fact. Now unless the Flying Spagetti Monster is creating all the shit that goes into the atmosphere, I'd say humans are responsible.

I've been on messageboards for the best part of seven years and had this argument so many times (and produced the evidence), I'll be blowed if I'm gonna do it again. What I will say is this: 99 percent of climatologists (not scientists of varying backgrounds, but the scientists who specialise in the climate) agree with me (re humans causing the problem). That's all I need to say on the subject. Bring out your Medicine Men, and they can sell you your bottle of Dr Good, but if you wanna put your head in the have at it. Just remember to tell your grandkids, when they inherit this place, what you did to stop it...

I think it will be a moot point anyway the way the world's pressure cooker is heating up. Say man made global warming is true....

what would a mushroom cloud do to global warming? seriously.

 

[Dr Grump]

I think it will be a moot point anyway the way the world's pressure cooker is heating up. Say man made global warming is true....

what would a mushroom cloud do to global warming? seriously.

You're far too pessimistic. I don't think the world is in that bad shape.

 

[elvis]

I think it will be a moot point anyway the way the world's pressure cooker is heating up. Say man made global warming is true....

what would a mushroom cloud do to global warming? seriously.

You're far too pessimistic. I don't think the world is in that bad shape.

You're talking about my grandkids.....which is about 30 years away, roughly.

the world is a lot more screwed up than it was in 1979.

 

[FactFinder]

The "glaring" reminder of man's rather insignificant part on the planet comes from no sunspots for about a year and a half and the fact that the planet has been cooling since 2001 disregarding man's CO2 output.

Yesterday there was teenie active spot on the sun that they thought would devleop into a spot, but the sun was just toying with them.

Here is the sun's current state:

Yesterday's proto-sunspot failed to materialize. The sun is blank. Credit: SOHO/MDI