New Strategy From Rittenhouse Defense Team; He Was Just Hunting

LOLOL

A defense witness who may or may not be allowed to testify in the trial. Defenses only select witnesses who provide testimony favorable to their defense.


He will be allowed. THe judge ridiculed the prosecution for even asking that, pointing out that they have a good history of using such experts themselves.

And I really wonder if the prosecution will be able to find an expert that will disagree. Rittenhouse was so clearly attacked, that any expert that claims otherwise, is going to lose all credibility among his peers.


REally, as you know, your entire case rests on the technicality of using the "illegality" of the gun possession to claim that Rittenhouse thus lost his right to claim self defense.
 
Nope. He traveled there to protect property and to help injured people. Which he did.


Indeed, he was attacked, because he left his group to help someone, and then was not allowed to rejoin his group by the police.


THus, he was forced to be alone on the street, and of course, the cowardly mob, then seeing a lone, young man, who, left's face it, does not look like a tough guy, sensed weakness and attacked.

So he's a regular George Zimmerman. Terminally stupid.. He shot people who were unarmed.
 
Vapid whining. Your fantasies are colliding with reality again. And instead of puting on your big boy pants and taking the L, you are regressing to a childlike state and inventing fantasy 'spiracies to explain why the world isn't coddling your retarded fetishes.

Just exactly like your orange lard and master. My how you adore and emulate him in every way.


No conspiracy is required. More like sheep moving in a group. It just happens.


And it is not a fantasy. We have seen it repeatedly now, in Russiagate, and the Hillary investigation, and the way the school did not report the sexual assault by the trannie.
 
He will be allowed. THe judge ridiculed the prosecution for even asking that, pointing out that they have a good history of using such experts themselves.

And I really wonder if the prosecution will be able to find an expert that will disagree. Rittenhouse was so clearly attacked, that any expert that claims otherwise, is going to lose all credibility among his peers.


REally, as you know, your entire case rests on the technicality of using the "illegality" of the gun possession to claim that Rittenhouse thus lost his right to claim self defense.
All bullshit.

The judge has said he's giving the prosecution an opportunity to bring their own use of force expert to counter the defense's before deciding if that defense witness will get to testify at trial.

You're also wrong about the entire case hinging on his illegal possession of the gun. They can also argue excessive force. They can argue mishandling of the gun. They may have witnesses to justify Rosenbaum going after him.
 
No conspiracy is required
A conspiracy in the justice system and to fix the jury is exactly the embarrassing fantasy you suggest. And you do so because you are already lining up pre emptive excuses as a coping mechanism. Otherwise you would have to admit yourself that you are a complete nutter. And that is hard to do.
 
Who says they were trying to kill him? People chasing him were yelling he just shot someone. And again, Grosskreutz didn't have to approach Rittenhouse. If their intent was to kill him, Grosskreutz would have just shot him.
None of that shit matters.

Did Rittenhouse reasonably believe that he was in danger of serious bodily injury or death?

Did he try to retreat?

Was his use of force reasonable under the circumstances?

Yes on all accounts. Everything else is bullshit.
 
LOLOL

A defense witness who may or may not be allowed to testify in the trial. Defenses only select witnesses who provide testimony favorable to their defense.
He will. What's your Daubert challenge?

Prosecutors can go get their own self-defense expert, if anyone is willing to testify (probably not). Otherwise, that testimony would be incredibly helpful and the jury will hear the testimony.
 
Not really the issue in the trial, though. The prosecution is going to argue that, since Kyle was there illegally and possessing a weapon illegally, he does not have the right to claim self defense. And they are going to argue to his intent.
And, that is an argument that has failed an innumerable amount of times. Felons in possession of firearms have been cleared of all charges except unlawful possession of a firearm in a shooting where self-defense was necessary.

Self-defense requiring deadly force takes all other legal issues off the table.
 
But in the initial coverage I was to understand that widdle Kyle was given the weapon by a local friend...so it wasn't even his personal weapon or that of a local relative. Looks like his lawyers are getting desperate.
Desperate...
To avoid a misdemeanor weapons charge?
If this is what they're worried about, they know they have the muder/manslaughter charges beat.
 
So he's a regular George Zimmerman. Terminally stupid.. He shot people who were unarmed.


.1. Nothing stupid about wanting to help your fellow citizens.

2. Irrelevant that the some of the members of the mob that attacked him and got shot, were unarmed.

3. Two of them were armed, one with a skateboard and one with A FUCKING HANDGUN.
 
.1. Nothing stupid about wanting to help your fellow citizens.

2. Irrelevant that the some of the members of the mob that attacked him and got shot, were unarmed.

3. Two of them were armed, one with a skateboard and one with A FUCKING HANDGUN.

I am not supportive of vigilantes or morons like Rittenhouse and Zimmerman.
 
All bullshit.

The judge has said he's giving the prosecution an opportunity to bring their own use of force expert to counter the defense's before deciding if that defense witness will get to testify at trial.

You're also wrong about the entire case hinging on his illegal possession of the gun. They can also argue excessive force. They can argue mishandling of the gun. They may have witnesses to justify Rosenbaum going after him.


1. Correct. The prosecution argued against the very idea of "experts" as not being valid, at least for this case, and is looking for an expert of their own. My point was, that they will have trouble finding one, that will say what they want.

2. They can argue it. That argument COULD work, if the jury is comprised of people ignorant of the reality of use of force AND is denied any expert testimony to inform them.


3. It is worth nothing, that the video clearly shows a mob, at least two of them armed, attacking a lone teenager, who kept trying to run away, and him defending himself. That is what happened and that we are society are trying to put this young man away, is a massive SHAME on US.
 
A conspiracy in the justice system and to fix the jury is exactly the embarrassing fantasy you suggest. And you do so because you are already lining up pre emptive excuses as a coping mechanism. Otherwise you would have to admit yourself that you are a complete nutter. And that is hard to do.


Nope. Libtards have been radicalized to the point that what they consider proper behavior, is them putting political considerations ahead of their actual responsibilities.


That does not require communication with others, or a conspiracy.


This is the result of the fantasy world YOU PEOPLE are living in, where America is an Evul w.s. power, and you are the plucky heroes, fighting against forces that in real life were defeated by better people before you were born.


Thus the reality is, no reasonable person can trust ANYTHING that MIGHT have a lib near it, because you people are bat shit crazy and operating on the basis of your madness.
 
1. Correct. The prosecution argued against the very idea of "experts" as not being valid, at least for this case, and is looking for an expert of their own. My point was, that they will have trouble finding one, that will say what they want.

2. They can argue it. That argument COULD work, if the jury is comprised of people ignorant of the reality of use of force AND is denied any expert testimony to inform them.


3. It is worth nothing, that the video clearly shows a mob, at least two of them armed, attacking a lone teenager, who kept trying to run away, and him defending himself. That is what happened and that we are society are trying to put this young man away, is a massive SHAME on US.
Yes, video shows them trying to disarm an active Shooter. They too have a right to self-defense.
 
Nope. Libtards have been radicalized to the point that what they consider proper behavior, is them putting political considerations ahead of their actual responsibilities.


That does not require communication with others, or a conspiracy.


This is the result of the fantasy world YOU PEOPLE are living in, where America is an Evul w.s. power, and you are the plucky heroes, fighting against forces that in real life were defeated by better people before you were born.


Thus the reality is, no reasonable person can trust ANYTHING that MIGHT have a lib near it, because you people are bat shit crazy and operating on the basis of your madness.
^^^ cries a nut from the unhinged right crying the election was stolen by fraud they can't find.
 

Forum List

Back
Top