''We will be looking at what contact tracing looks like in the new world order'' she contended.
Those are music to the ears of you hate filled gun nuts. Deliberately taking it out of context does not mean a new world order. Her reference was to reviewing contact tracing as a successful way yo trace the virus. There is no new world order so settle down.
And there you have it.
As an aside, the next time you read dialogue from our Marxist friends telling us all how wonderful it would be if we changed our gun laws to reflect those of Australia's, take a minute to think about the consequences of Australia's choice to voluntarily relinquish their means of fighting back against these jack boots.
Anyway...
Australians are far more civilised than requiring guns to defend themselves.
You've had your chances to retaliate against your perceived takeover of America by Obama but never fired a shot. Home of the brave my arse.
Furthermore, the Australian is currently the liberal party, which is the equivalent to the Republican party here. I don't care if you don't believe but it's a fact. Check it if you're brave.
Also the gun amnesty in 1996, was conducted under the same party. So your assumption of them being Marxist is unfounded and ignorant but you are a Republican who inheritantly possesses those qualities.
When the guns were reduced to over half what it was, and might I add the whole scheme was voluntary, yes, They were not forced by police, the country now has twice as many guns before the amnesty.
You can check it all if you like but you're an ignoramus so it won't happen.
So, that statistic alone points to that country not needing guns for the maintenance if civil society. They do not want to evolve into the wild west show you guys are.
So before you fire off another ignorant blurt, check the facts I have stated and consider an apology for deliberately telling lies.
