New report: Rifles less lethal than handguns in mass public shootings. Anti gunners cry.

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,060
52,345
2,290
The anti gunners want to ban the AR-15 rifle so bad, they can't stand it..........and every bit of evidence, every fact about these rifles, every real world experience...shows they have no case....

Rifles found to be less lethal than handguns in mass shootings

In public mass shootings in the U.S., victims shot with a handgun were more likely to die than in the events associated with a rifle, according to a new study in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
----
The research team found that events with a handgun were associated with a higher percentage of people killed, whereas events involving a rifle were associated with more people shot. About 26 percent of those shot with a handgun had more than one fatal wound, versus two percent of people shot with a rifle. Handguns were also more likely to be associated with brain and heart injuries.

"All of us were shocked. We came to the table with our bias that an assault weapon would be worse," Sarani said. "This should inform the medical community about what to expect at trauma centers and lawmakers about reasonable gun laws."
 
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill lol good argument
 
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill lol good argument


More people die when hand guns are used.......and even then...the total number of people killed in mass public shootings in 2018? 77.

Total number killed in accidental car deaths.... 38,748

We need to ban cars......

Lawn mowers kill just as many people every year than mass public shooters do......as do ladders....
 
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill lol good argument
It's not an argument you fucking moron! It's a finding by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
Stay off meth, kids.
 
Going to the range with my Colt M4 today in celebration of another year of freedom.
 
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill lol good argument


More people die when hand guns are used.......and even then...the total number of people killed in mass public shootings in 2018? 77.

Total number killed in accidental car deaths.... 38,748

We need to ban cars......

Lawn mowers kill just as many people every year than mass public shooters do......as do ladders....
You should take a break from the internet and get some mental health care. Then turn in your guns, you’re a danger to normal people.
 
Yeah my agreement that AR bullets kill at a lower rate was big time refuting. Check if you pissed yourself again, retard
It sure was, fool! You said:
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill...

More bullets fired...more people killed, you say. That's NOT what the Journal of the College of American of Surgeons found, idiot! "The research team found that events with a handgun were associated with a higher percentage of people killed, whereas events involving a rifle were associated with more people shot"

Lying now about what you clearly said won't make you look any smarter...retard!
 
Yeah my agreement that AR bullets kill at a lower rate was big time refuting. Check if you pissed yourself again, retard
It sure was, fool! You said:
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill...

More bullets fired...more people killed, you say. That's NOT what the Journal of the College of American of Surgeons found, idiot! "The research team found that events with a handgun were associated with a higher percentage of people killed, whereas events involving a rifle were associated with more people shot"

Lying now about what you clearly said won't make you look any smarter...retard!
More do die. You are confusing count with rate because you are uneducated and almost certainly retarded. Or maybe you think the Vegas shooter would have killed more people and at a higher rate with a pistol than a rifle?
 
More do die. You are confusing count with rate because you are uneducated and most certainly retarded.
I love how you act as though the people who are right are the stupid ones when you keep fucking getting it wrong.

You are bringing in the total of people killed in shooting events, which is not what the OP is discussing. But how could you possibly know that? One would have to be able to read and discern what is written to know that and clearly that's far beyond your abilities.

ARs hit more people but pistols kill more and do more damage when they hit..you fucking meth addicted moron!

You can't even understand what the claims in the OP are.
 
Having fewer guns means fewer gun deaths.


No, actually, it doesn't....murder is based on the desire of the criminal to end a life....we have more guns and yet our gun murder rate keeps going down...Britain banned guns, yet their gun murder rate didn't change......

We went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 17.25 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
 
The most lethal are Republicans who insist on giving military grade weapons to the mentally ill.

I don't get it.

DrwlLQHWkAEhKs1.jpg


If only they would fight for children with the save ferver they fight for gun rights for the insane.
 
The most lethal are Republicans who insist on giving military grade weapons to the mentally ill.

I don't get it.

DrwlLQHWkAEhKs1.jpg


If only they would fight for children with the save ferver they fight for gun rights for the insane.


And actual research shows us that it is democrats, not Republicans, that are killing people with guns....

Analysis | The surprising way gun violence is dividing America

In the most Democratic regions, gun violence is more often committed against another, crimes that probably generate more news coverage and fear. In the most Republican areas, it is more often committed against oneself, suicides that may not attract as much attention.

------

As the below charts show, Democratic areas (measured by the party that controls the congressional district) are far more likely to experience almost all forms of malicious gun violence than Republican areas.
 
Yeah my agreement that AR bullets kill at a lower rate was big time refuting. Check if you pissed yourself again, retard
It sure was, fool! You said:
Lol assault rifles are able to shoot way more people and more people die but in the mad spray a lower percentage of the bullets kill...

More bullets fired...more people killed, you say. That's NOT what the Journal of the College of American of Surgeons found, idiot! "The research team found that events with a handgun were associated with a higher percentage of people killed, whereas events involving a rifle were associated with more people shot"

Lying now about what you clearly said won't make you look any smarter...retard!

The difference is actually easy to understand. When the Las Vegas shooter was spraying bullets at a crowd, he was firing at what the military call an Area Target. In other words, just firing as fast as he could into the crowd. A hit, any hit is what he was going for.

But pistols tend to be used much closer, and more time is spent aiming, and you end up with more vital organs hit. It is unlikely that you would die from being shot in the forearm, or the calf. You would be hurt certainly, but probably not die. The Las Vegas shooter had a killing rate of about 10%, which is about average for such things. The round the AR uses is preferred for a number of reasons, but especially because it creates a “militarily significant wound” that is to say that the individual shot is now wounded, and requires care. That means someone has to carry him off the field of battle, taking three or four people out of the fight, instead of just one.

One of the horrors the troops had to endure in the First World War was the sound of screaming men, wounded and crying out for help, for their Mothers, for anyone to please just help them. It wears on the nerves, and causes fear in the troops who endure it.

Now, if the bullet from the AR strikes the chest or head, then chances are you have a mortal wound. However, that is the same story for a pistol round, which is why people are taught to shoot center mass, because it increases the odds for a vital organ to be hit.

Spray and Pray technique does not have a high rate of vital hits, because the part you are shooting at is relatively small. The FBI used a picture of a Milk Bottle target for a long time, to show you how small the vital organs you were aiming at really were.

86652E41-DBD6-43EC-B343-8429390606C9.gif


Now hits outside of the Bottle might kill you, but probably won’t. They’ll hurt, and cause some damage, but probably not death, providing you get medical treatment in a timely manner.

Using the Bump Stock further reduced the accuracy of the rifle in Las Vegas, it is hard to hit things with a fully automatic rifle, one that you want jumping in your hands is nearly impossible. To do so your target would have to be large, really large. Well his was. It was a large crowd, and he was firing into it randomly. He would have had a much higher kill ratio with a M1A rifle firing the 308 Winchester round using a scope. Every round would have been aimed, and chances are he would have topped three kills for four shots.

The rapid fire was intended to create a panic, and cause further injuries by a stampeding crowd.

Being hit by a pistol bullet inside the milk bottle, is much much worse than being hit by a rifle round outside of it. Statistics show that to be the case, and if you don’t like statistics, you can use common sense. We throw our hands up to defend ourselves when someone is punching us. Not because we want our hands hurt, but because we are willing to let them be hurt to protect our heads and torso’s. Common Sense and Survival Instinct.
 

Forum List

Back
Top