New poll shows Hillary beating all the current dems lol

View attachment 294234

I’ve been betting on January-February timeframe.


Recent survey was done by Harvard's Center for American Political Studies

Poll gave Clinton 21 per cent support followed by Joe Biden with 20 per cent

Bernie Sanders gets 12 percent while Senator Elizabeth Warren is at 9 per cent

On November 29, Clinton told BBC's Graham Norton she wouldn't rule out a run


Hillary Clinton would be leading the race for the Democratic nomination for president if she declared her candidacy, according to a new poll.

The online survey by Harris Poll which was released by Harvard University’s Center for American Political Studies shows the former secretary of state in first place with 21 per cent of the vote.

Joe Biden, the current frontrunner, would receive 20 per cent while Senator Bernie Sanders is at 12 per cent.

New poll shows Hillary Clinton in first place among Democratic candidates | Daily Mail Online
Its her turn, again, for the third time.
 
Did someone say Former Secretary of State Hillary CLINTON??????
images

They are besotted with her....
She's trolling them so bad.....:auiqs.jpg:

Don’t you mean the Dems participating in these polls are being trolled?
 
The one constant in Hillary Rodham Clinton's public life is that her personal approval rating goes UP when she is out of the public view and it goes DOWN the more she is seen in public. It was true when she was First Lady of Arkansas, when she was FLOTUS, when she was a Senator, Secretary of State, and even when she was running for President. There were WEEKS during the 2016 campaign when she might have been hiding in a Tibetan cave, for all the public knew. And her favorability rose and fell on how much visibility she had.

And it remains true. Get her out in front of the public, get her into one of the debates, and her favorability rankings will tank yet again.

She is simply a nauseating public person. She might be a great grandmother or whatever, but as a public figure she sucks.

:desk:

I KNOW !


PUT HER IN JAIL -

:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
She SHOULD be in jail, along with her hubby, Bubba.
I think what you CRCs want to call them is con-centration camps.
 
Oh shit, this would be better than Jpjo could ever be!!!
------------

Hotair ^ | 121/09/2019



55353ce2-e0c0-48e0-8dc4-ba00dc9b4a73.jpg

Caveat: These aren’t the numbers you get when you airdrop Clinton into the race and no one else. This is what the race looked like when Harvard-Harris added Clinton and Mike Bloomberg and John Kerry(?!) to the mix.

If you thought the Democratic top tier was lily-white now, imagine those three being stirred into the pot. Blinding white, one might call it.


I mean, the whiteness of Hillary and Kerry alone is so bright that you can scarcely find it elsewhere in nature.

Anyway, the interesting result here is the fact her entry wouldn’t collapse Joe Biden’s numbers while leaving Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren unscathed. That’s what I would have expected, but nope.

Harvard-Harris, top 5 current 2020 field among Democratic voters:

Biden 29
Sanders 16
Warren 13
Buttigieg 8
Bloomberg 7

If Hillary Clinton and John Kerry get in race?

Clinton 21
Biden 20
Sanders 12
Warren 9
Buttigieg & Kerry 5https://t.co/KiEbT2ik7Z

— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) December 9, 2019



Biden takes the worst hit, as you’d assume, since he and Hillary would compete for center-left and black voters. But Sanders slips out of the teens and Warren falls out of double digits. Who are those voters? Which Bernie fan is sitting around like “Time to right the mistake of 2016 — unless I can vote for Clinton again”?

Dick Morris thinks she really is thinking about it:

“Biden and Warren were blocking the lanes Hillary needs to run in in order to get nominated. Warren, because she’s a woman, and now with Kamala Harris out of the race, and Warren having slipped, that road may be open. Hillary may be able to say, ‘vote for me, because I’m the only chance we have to elect a woman president.'”…

“And the lane that Biden was occupying is the lane that people would say, ‘Well, let’s at least join somebody that’s shown they can beat Donald Trump – that’s shown they have the ability to win a national election like Biden did,” Morris told host John Catsimatidis.

“Hillary will basically say, ‘I have that capacity. I got more votes than Donald Trump did last time. I know I can beat this guy. People should vote for me because I’m the only proven warrior out there that can tackle him.'”

“I’m the only one who can beat this guy” would be a ballsy assertion coming from someone who might well have been the only Democrat with a national profile capable of losing to someone as unpopular as Trump was in 2016. Her special cocktail of blandness, scandal, and mushy establishmentarianism gave him jussssst enough lesser-of-two-evils juice to make magic in the battleground states.

What Morris says about Clinton’s potential gender pitch is interesting, though. The freefall decline in the polls of one of the two most prominent women running this year, Kamala Harris, was masked in a way by the fact that Warren soared in polling over the same period. Because of that surge, no one at the time could credibly claim that Dem voters weren’t giving women candidates a fair chance this year the way critics are now claiming that they haven’t given black candidates a fair chance per Harris’s and Cory Booker’s poor showings. But now that Warren has lost nearly half her share of the national primary vote since October and has slipped to third in Iowa and New Hampshire, we’re poised for a full-fledged media freakout if she slips further.

Can you imagine the angry takes if the new year begins with a clear-cut top three of white dudes Biden, Bernie, and Buttigieg? The press might demand a Hillary reprise purely as a nod to diversity. Progressives might even endorse it for tactical reasons, believing that she’d bleed votes mainly from Grandpa Joe and Mayor Pete, clearing a path for Sanders.

The DNC would have a collective panic attack for the same reason, especially since Clinton would be too late to qualify for the ballot in some primaries. One scenario is that she’d divide the centrist vote and inadvertently help Sanders sweep to the nomination; a second scenario is that she’d win just enough of the vote to cause a stalemate with Biden or Buttigieg and Sanders, ensuring a nightmarish brokered convention. I’m not sure which scenario is worse from the DNC’s perspective. (Presumably the first one.) Let’s try it and see.

Here’s Bernie discussing the coming match-up with Hillary. Sorry, I mean the last match-up with Hillary.

Sen. Bernie Sanders responds to Hillary’s criticism of him: “I’m sorry that Hillary Clinton is rerunning 2016… I worked as hard as humanly possible. We did dozens and dozens of rallies around this country.”pic.twitter.com/MFybZVT2lD

— Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) December 9, 2019
The democrats would have to be quite literally trying to lose the election to run Hillary. You’re running a repeat loser against an incumbent with a semi-okay economy. Nevermind that said repeat loser is viewed by quite literally almost everyone as hilariously corrupt. It must be some kind of inside job. GOP must have somehow planted saboteurs in the DNC.
 
An insult can thus be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter.
 
View attachment 294234

I’ve been betting on January-February timeframe.


Recent survey was done by Harvard's Center for American Political Studies

Poll gave Clinton 21 per cent support followed by Joe Biden with 20 per cent

Bernie Sanders gets 12 percent while Senator Elizabeth Warren is at 9 per cent

On November 29, Clinton told BBC's Graham Norton she wouldn't rule out a run


Hillary Clinton would be leading the race for the Democratic nomination for president if she declared her candidacy, according to a new poll.

The online survey by Harris Poll which was released by Harvard University’s Center for American Political Studies shows the former secretary of state in first place with 21 per cent of the vote.

Joe Biden, the current frontrunner, would receive 20 per cent while Senator Bernie Sanders is at 12 per cent.

New poll shows Hillary Clinton in first place among Democratic candidates | Daily Mail Online
Did someone say Former Secretary of State Hillary CLINTON??????
images
Yes...that’s the bitch that got her ass kicked in 2016.
 
Hillarty wants to be drafted by a unified party calling for her to step in.

Aint gonna happen.

Bernie supporters wont go along.
 
Even if Hillary thought that it would be a good idea to run again, there is no way in hell that the Dems would ever put her in as the nominee again. She's no longer politically viable, no matter how much the Trump supporters wish she would run.

I have to disagree with you on this...

After her interview with Howard Stern and the fact those running for the Democratic Nomination seem lackluster I can see them taking her...

Would she win?

Most likely not but I can't even see Biden winning in 2020...
 
Even if Hillary thought that it would be a good idea to run again, there is no way in hell that the Dems would ever put her in as the nominee again. She's no longer politically viable, no matter how much the Trump supporters wish she would run.

I have to disagree with you on this...

After her interview with Howard Stern and the fact those running for the Democratic Nomination seem lackluster I can see them taking her...

Would she win?

Most likely not but I can't even see Biden winning in 2020...

Bottom line: The democrats have no one who can beat Trump if the economy keeps humming along. Peace and prosperity generally win elections.
 
Here’s the question would Tom Perez would allow a corrupt president candidate buy her way vs letting the delegates choose the candidate! Perez isn’t no Donna Brazile. For all the democrats who are going to label me sexist because I’m thrashing the poor Hillary because she is a woman. I’m not against the idea of a female presidency but, I’m question is we have basically one since the other candidates dropped out! But, Hillary Clinton needs to get in why? She doesn’t have any ideas


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Even if Hillary thought that it would be a good idea to run again, there is no way in hell that the Dems would ever put her in as the nominee again. She's no longer politically viable, no matter how much the Trump supporters wish she would run.

I have to disagree with you on this...

After her interview with Howard Stern and the fact those running for the Democratic Nomination seem lackluster I can see them taking her...

Would she win?

Most likely not but I can't even see Biden winning in 2020...

Bottom line: The democrats have no one who can beat Trump if the economy keeps humming along. Peace and prosperity generally win elections.

That is the issue for Democrats and they think this is 1974 and they are dealing with Nixon when it is 2020 and dealing with Trump.

As long as the economy stays strong and no major conflicts I see no way the Democrats winning in next November election...

Let look at the top candidates for the left:

Biden: Possible Dementia and the fact Ukraine will not go away will hurt him in 2020, so even if he win the nomination he will lose the General Election because of the grueling road to the Oval Office...

Warren: Her medicare for all platform is stolen just like her Native American Heritage and Americand do not want a single payer system.

Trump will chew her up and dispatch with her quicker than Hillary...

Sanders: The wannabe Trotksy is the Ron Paul of the left and sure he is fun to watch but you damn well know he would be a major disaster if elected...

Mayor Pete: Green and Gay... Sure America has a gay President by the name of James Buchanan but in today political climate there is no damn way he get elected...

Bloomberg: Attempting to pull off a Trump but is hated by both fringe sides and does not have the Biden or Mayor Pete support...

So those top candidates will lose, so Hillary might as well say third time is a charm and lose again...
 
Oh shit, this would be better than Jpjo could ever be!!!
------------

Hotair ^ | 121/09/2019



55353ce2-e0c0-48e0-8dc4-ba00dc9b4a73.jpg

Caveat: These aren’t the numbers you get when you airdrop Clinton into the race and no one else. This is what the race looked like when Harvard-Harris added Clinton and Mike Bloomberg and John Kerry(?!) to the mix.

If you thought the Democratic top tier was lily-white now, imagine those three being stirred into the pot. Blinding white, one might call it.


I mean, the whiteness of Hillary and Kerry alone is so bright that you can scarcely find it elsewhere in nature.

Anyway, the interesting result here is the fact her entry wouldn’t collapse Joe Biden’s numbers while leaving Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren unscathed. That’s what I would have expected, but nope.

Harvard-Harris, top 5 current 2020 field among Democratic voters:

Biden 29
Sanders 16
Warren 13
Buttigieg 8
Bloomberg 7

If Hillary Clinton and John Kerry get in race?

Clinton 21
Biden 20
Sanders 12
Warren 9
Buttigieg & Kerry 5https://t.co/KiEbT2ik7Z

— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) December 9, 2019



Biden takes the worst hit, as you’d assume, since he and Hillary would compete for center-left and black voters. But Sanders slips out of the teens and Warren falls out of double digits. Who are those voters? Which Bernie fan is sitting around like “Time to right the mistake of 2016 — unless I can vote for Clinton again”?

Dick Morris thinks she really is thinking about it:

“Biden and Warren were blocking the lanes Hillary needs to run in in order to get nominated. Warren, because she’s a woman, and now with Kamala Harris out of the race, and Warren having slipped, that road may be open. Hillary may be able to say, ‘vote for me, because I’m the only chance we have to elect a woman president.'”…

“And the lane that Biden was occupying is the lane that people would say, ‘Well, let’s at least join somebody that’s shown they can beat Donald Trump – that’s shown they have the ability to win a national election like Biden did,” Morris told host John Catsimatidis.

“Hillary will basically say, ‘I have that capacity. I got more votes than Donald Trump did last time. I know I can beat this guy. People should vote for me because I’m the only proven warrior out there that can tackle him.'”

“I’m the only one who can beat this guy” would be a ballsy assertion coming from someone who might well have been the only Democrat with a national profile capable of losing to someone as unpopular as Trump was in 2016. Her special cocktail of blandness, scandal, and mushy establishmentarianism gave him jussssst enough lesser-of-two-evils juice to make magic in the battleground states.

What Morris says about Clinton’s potential gender pitch is interesting, though. The freefall decline in the polls of one of the two most prominent women running this year, Kamala Harris, was masked in a way by the fact that Warren soared in polling over the same period. Because of that surge, no one at the time could credibly claim that Dem voters weren’t giving women candidates a fair chance this year the way critics are now claiming that they haven’t given black candidates a fair chance per Harris’s and Cory Booker’s poor showings. But now that Warren has lost nearly half her share of the national primary vote since October and has slipped to third in Iowa and New Hampshire, we’re poised for a full-fledged media freakout if she slips further.

Can you imagine the angry takes if the new year begins with a clear-cut top three of white dudes Biden, Bernie, and Buttigieg? The press might demand a Hillary reprise purely as a nod to diversity. Progressives might even endorse it for tactical reasons, believing that she’d bleed votes mainly from Grandpa Joe and Mayor Pete, clearing a path for Sanders.

The DNC would have a collective panic attack for the same reason, especially since Clinton would be too late to qualify for the ballot in some primaries. One scenario is that she’d divide the centrist vote and inadvertently help Sanders sweep to the nomination; a second scenario is that she’d win just enough of the vote to cause a stalemate with Biden or Buttigieg and Sanders, ensuring a nightmarish brokered convention. I’m not sure which scenario is worse from the DNC’s perspective. (Presumably the first one.) Let’s try it and see.

Here’s Bernie discussing the coming match-up with Hillary. Sorry, I mean the last match-up with Hillary.

Sen. Bernie Sanders responds to Hillary’s criticism of him: “I’m sorry that Hillary Clinton is rerunning 2016… I worked as hard as humanly possible. We did dozens and dozens of rallies around this country.”pic.twitter.com/MFybZVT2lD

— Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) December 9, 2019
I am shocked more people haven't figured this out, DemocRats look to who is the most criminal, and stupid then pick their candidate. It's been that way since JFK was murdered by LBJ.
 

Forum List

Back
Top