All I know is that I pay $964 a month dictated by the ACA which has to cover my 58 yo single male pregnancy, mental health disorders, and pre-existing conditions which I don't have. I asked if I could get an individual policy without that unnecessary coverage without paying a huge tax and was told NO,....it's against the law.
I'm happy to subsidize the poor and unhealthy, but why should I be penalized for being a single, older, male by purchasing preganancy insurance ?? Please give me an adequate response from knowledgeable individuals who understand the difference between healthcare access and healthcare insurance. So far, no one in the government, the health care industry, or the health care providers, nor the self proclaimed talking heads in the main stream media have provided a single answer to these questions.
I'm sure I'll get a bunch of nasty responses from people that really don't have a clue about healthcare. I'll refer you to the New Zealand system which seems to work, but it is two tiered. Medicaid and Medicare are unsustainable monetarily. Both the Reps and Dems have no clue what they are doing in this regard.