New Evidence Indicates Enough Illegal Votes In Georgia To Tip 2020 Results

[DrLove]

toobfreak No Short Buster. “Dismissal” does not address REASONS for dismissal, which in most, but not all of these cases was “Lack of Evidence”.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...

EXACTLY, Jack. You, the media and politicians have made the accusation TEN THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES that ALL of the questions, doubts and charges against the Fall election have all been proven BASELESS and have all been thoroughly, COMPLETELY DEBUNKED. PROVIDE THE PROOF OF THAT. That's all. Provide ANYTHING, other than YOUR empty claims.

There was ample time

Ample time? Jack, you are just making yourself the LAUGHING STOCK of USMB making such HORSESHIT bogus claims. They had a few weeks. It will take many weeks if not months just to go over all of the fraud allegations here describing them and simply offering up whatever supporting evidence for or against each one of them by me and others!

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

I am perfectly capable of understanding him. For better than six months he'd been dealing alt-right links to bullshit election fraud claims. Trying to make the case that these articles are evidence of fraud. Now that those have all been batted down, he's trying a reverse. Making the claim that it's incumbent upon the people saying fraud didn't happen to prove their claims. This way, he doesn't have to put up any more of his so called "evidence". Just scream fraud long enough and loud enough. Unfortunately, it's incumbent upon those making the claim of fraud to prove it...which so far, they haven't been able to do.

The poster has also bragged on these boards for months how he was going to start a voter fraud thread. Problem is, he knows it would be destroyed in less than 20 posts.
He has no balls. Hence my new nickname for him...cuck.

 

[The Purge]

https://thefederalist.com ^ | By Margot Cleveland JULY 9, 2021

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications. Also like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote. These facts, coupled with the closeness of the presidential contest in Georgia and other states, led to a flurry of accusations and litigation charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violations of the Elector’s Clause of the constitution.

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Casting Doubt on Potential Illegal Votes Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

The Data Speaks for Itself When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

Davis’s data proves significant because critics of Trump’s challenge to the certification of Georgia’s election results framed the NCOA information as either unreliable or of an insufficient magnitude to cast the outcome of the election in doubt. But by updating their voter registration information with the same address as contained in the NCOA database, the voters themselves have established the reliability of that information.

Further, by updating their address for purposes of their voter registration, these same voters are confirming their move is not temporary. “When a person updates their voter registration to a new address, they are informing the county board of elections and correspondingly the Secretary of State that they regard the new address as their legal residence,” Evans explained.

What Do Georgia Officials Know? Upon learning of this new development, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office quietly opened an investigation into potentially illegal voting by residents who had moved between counties. Davis provided his data to the office in May, with a detailed explanation of his analysis. Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting.

Immediately following the interview, both his press secretary, Walter Jones, and his deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, called me back to follow up on my questions on the status of that investigation. While Jones spoke favorably of Davis, he suggested that Davis’s figure included “false-positives” because Davis lacked access to Social Security numbers and birth dates of voters, and thus Davis’s list likely included different individuals bearing the same name. Fuchs suggested a similar issue with Davis’s analysis.

“There is no need to have access to Social Security numbers or birth dates,” Davis told me. “Every voter has a unique eight-digit voter identification number,” Davis explained that these voter identification numbers tie to the voters’ names and addresses and to vote-history data, which documents when and where their votes are cast and comes from the secretary of state’s own data.

Davis provided access to that data, following the execution of a non-disclosure agreement, and I confirmed Davis’s representation. Davis also provided processing certification verifying receipt of the NCOA data.

“I provided this exact same information to Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the secretary of state,” Davis told me, sharing a copy of the email sent to Watson.

When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications.

Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

-------------------

“While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. “

In other words: “Yes, we stole the election, but it’s too late now and there’s nothing you can do about it. Better luck next time.”

Us: “Oh well, OK, den...”

Why would those votes be ignored? They weren't. It's bullshit.

Over 35,000 votes from people voting in either the wrong district or DOUBLE VOTING....You lying scumbag nazi demonRATS are truly the scum of America

I notice it says "indicates" but no proof.
It also says trump will not be declared the winner.
But you blast on here with breaking news containing fuck all. The same lame excuses which prove nothing. The same hate and bile dripping from ignorant lying mouth yet democrats are scum.
Aren't you a nice piece of shit.

One has to wonder if YOU have a functioning mind, or simply hate America so much that you NEED to have people in power to collapse the country....and you talk about piece of shit, you must be looking in a mirror!

You lot are the ones hating the country. Your mob trashed the capitol attempting to destroy democracy because you hated the system.
Previous Democrat governments haven't collapsed the country. That's bullshit. It's scaremongering. You're brain dead and a piece of lying hypocritical shit. Had enough yet?

You mean the over 40% of the protesters that were LET IN TO THE CAPITOL to demonstrate by the police?....And the only casualties were ONE UNARMED WHITE WOMAN VETERAN.....HOW MANY GUNS WERR CONFISCATED BY THAT INSURRECTION GROUP.....And you fucking idiots call an unarmed protest an insurrection....how brain dead are you, undoubtedly another nazi with a low 2 digit IQ!

Whadda pantload ^

Anti-American ever hear a pledge said before a subversive gathering.....enough said, Dr. DOOM has lost his standing!!!! ROTFLMFAO!

 

[asaratis]

Next I'll be a fascist and a marcist. Then I don't love America.

That's your standard retort against your opponents here. Call them a Nazi.

Fuck off, little boy.

 

[asaratis]

Now that those have all been batted down, he's trying a reverse. Making the claim that it's incumbent upon the people saying fraud didn't happen to prove their claims.

That's what you fail to understand. The evidence of election fraud has not been refuted. It has not been batted down. It has simply been denied by the cheaters and the useful idiots to have occurred in the manner described in the 900+ affidavits (evidence), the hundreds of videos (evidence), and the other descriptions (evidence) of what happened on the internet. Massive election fraud did occur.

The only way to prove beyond any logical doubt that it did happen is to complete enough forensic audits of the ballots in the questionable states to reveal the number of fraudulent votes that were counted (or manufactured by manipulation of the internet based counting system). It's the cheaters and the useful idiots that oppose and are attemting to obstruct such audits. They do not want the truth revealed. Why?

He has no balls. Hence my new nickname for him...cuck.

You have no intelligence. Hence my new nickname for you...JackOff.

 

[DrLove]

The Purge You are one sad dude in complete & total denial.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Now that those have all been batted down, he's trying a reverse. Making the claim that it's incumbent upon the people saying fraud didn't happen to prove their claims.

That's what you fail to understand. The evidence of election fraud has not been refuted. It has not been batted down. It has simply been denied by the cheaters and the useful idiots to have occurred in the manner described in the 900+ affidavits (evidence), the hundreds of videos (evidence), and the other descriptions (evidence) of what happened on the internet. Massive election fraud did occur.

The only way to prove beyond any logical doubt that it did happen is to complete enough forensic audits of the ballots in the questionable states to reveal the number of fraudulent votes that were counted (or manufactured by manipulation of the internet based counting system). It's the cheaters and the useful idiots that oppose and are attemting to obstruct such audits. They do not want the truth revealed. Why?

He has no balls. Hence my new nickname for him...cuck.

You have no intelligence. Hence my new nickname for you...JackOff.

Oooh, that's original. Thought owls were supposed to be smart? Oh well, I guess you're the exception to the rule.
I'd call you Hoot but you're not really funny.

I'm sorry, not one claim of voter fraud has been substantiated. They have all been dismissed. 70+ court cases, Republican and Democrat election officials across every state, the former AG and former election security supervisor. All saying this was the most secure election in our history. Every conspiracy theory batted down and debunked.

The only outcome you want to see is Donald John Trump declared the winner...and to keep this crap alive to push it closer to the 2022 elections.
I love the smell of desperation among Trump supporters.

 

[asaratis]

Check it out because your wrong and if that makes me a winner, which you decided, I'm happy. Because you a brain dead loser.

Again, your reading comprehension fails you. I didn't say it made you a winner. I said it makes you think you're a winner.. Go back to school, little boy...and pay attention this time.

My grammar is not the problem.

I can overlook your grammatical errors. It's your utter stupidity that cannot be ignored.

One thing you should learn is that just because someone calls you something doesn't that's what you are. That works both ways. Just because you call someone something doesn't mean that's what that person is.

 

[asaratis]

The Purge You are one sad dude in complete & total denial.

You are a cherry picker. Posting ONE video (out of THOUSANDS being held by the FBI) as proof of massive "insurrection" is a sad commentary regarding truth. The FBI was complicit in the entrapment. The FBI works for the liberals these days.

 

[DrLove]

Next I'll be a fascist and a marcist. Then I don't love America.

That's your standard retort against your opponents here. Call them a Nazi.

Fuck off, little boy.

Maybe ewe should speak with your Purge Pal about calling people Nazis

 

[DrLove]

The Purge You are one sad dude in complete & total denial.

You are a cherry picker. Posting ONE video (out of THOUSANDS being held by the FBI) as proof of massive "insurrection" is a sad commentary regarding truth. The FBI was complicit in the entrapment. The FBI works for the liberals these days.

Do you understand how entirely insane that sounds?
Meh, ya don’t - You’re totally down with the Mango Menace, Q, Rudy, MrPillow and that Kracken lady.

 

[DrLove]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...

EXACTLY, Jack. You, the media and politicians have made the accusation TEN THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES that ALL of the questions, doubts and charges against the Fall election have all been proven BASELESS and have all been thoroughly, COMPLETELY DEBUNKED. PROVIDE THE PROOF OF THAT. That's all. Provide ANYTHING, other than YOUR empty claims.

There was ample time

Ample time? Jack, you are just making yourself the LAUGHING STOCK of USMB making such HORSESHIT bogus claims. They had a few weeks. It will take many weeks if not months just to go over all of the fraud allegations here describing them and simply offering up whatever supporting evidence for or against each one of them by me and others!

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

I am perfectly capable of understanding him. For better than six months he'd been dealing alt-right links to bullshit election fraud claims. Trying to make the case that these articles are evidence of fraud. Now that those have all been batted down, he's trying a reverse. Making the claim that it's incumbent upon the people saying fraud didn't happen to prove their claims. This way, he doesn't have to put up any more of his so called "evidence". Just scream fraud long enough and loud enough. Unfortunately, it's incumbent upon those making the claim of fraud to prove it...which so far, they haven't been able to do.

The poster has also bragged on these boards for months how he was going to start a voter fraud thread. Problem is, he knows it would be destroyed in less than 20 posts.
He has no balls. Hence my new nickname for him...cuck.

Yep, only 31% of TEXAS REPUBLICANS believe the Big Lie about widespread voter fraud!

Few Texans believe voting fraud is common, UT/TT poll shows, undercutting GOP rationale for tightening voting rules

With no evidence of widespread voting fraud to cite, Republicans are shifting their argument to insist that new voting restrictions are needed to forestall even isolated instances of ineligible voters casting ballots.

www.texastribune.org

 

[asaratis]

Republican and Democrat election officials across every state, the former AG and former election security supervisor. All saying this was the most secure election in our history.

So you think government officials never lie? Former officials of much higher status than those you mention have lied their asses off to the American public. And you think state officials that participated in the fraudulent election procedures can't be lying. Most secure election in our history? My ass! It was the steal of the century!

The only outcome you want to see is Donald John Trump declared the winner

Read my previous posts concerning this matter. I have alredy stated that I do not expect Trump to replace Biden before 2024. I know that proof of enough fraud to reverse the election results will not get the Biden Crime Family out of the White and Trump into it. What it will do is generate more stringent and bi-partisan controls over future elections to preclude this disenfranchising of legal voters in future elections.

.and to keep this crap alive to push it closer to the 2022 elections.

Keeping crap alive for years is what Pelosi and her minions are attempting to do (and likely will) with their biased and unnecessary investigation of 6-1. The lying liberals have labeled the conservatives as domestic terrorists and want this label too stick through 2022 and possibly into 2024.

The bitch Nancy Pelosi is the sleaziest piece of dog squeeze ever to be Speaker of the House.

 

[asaratis]

The Purge You are one sad dude in complete & total denial.

You are a cherry picker. Posting ONE video (out of THOUSANDS being held by the FBI) as proof of massive "insurrection" is a sad commentary regarding truth. The FBI was complicit in the entrapment. The FBI works for the liberals these days.

Do you understand how entirely insane that sounds?
Meh, ya don’t - You’re totally down with the Mango Menace, Q, Rudy, MrPillow and that Kracken lady.

At least we have a hint regarding which network will receive the slow leak of selected videos from the FBI.

 

[Lastamender]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...

EXACTLY, Jack. You, the media and politicians have made the accusation TEN THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES that ALL of the questions, doubts and charges against the Fall election have all been proven BASELESS and have all been thoroughly, COMPLETELY DEBUNKED. PROVIDE THE PROOF OF THAT. That's all. Provide ANYTHING, other than YOUR empty claims.

There was ample time

Ample time? Jack, you are just making yourself the LAUGHING STOCK of USMB making such HORSESHIT bogus claims. They had a few weeks. It will take many weeks if not months just to go over all of the fraud allegations here describing them and simply offering up whatever supporting evidence for or against each one of them by me and others!

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

I am perfectly capable of understanding him. For better than six months he'd been dealing alt-right links to bullshit election fraud claims. Trying to make the case that these articles are evidence of fraud. Now that those have all been batted down, he's trying a reverse. Making the claim that it's incumbent upon the people saying fraud didn't happen to prove their claims. This way, he doesn't have to put up any more of his so called "evidence". Just scream fraud long enough and loud enough. Unfortunately, it's incumbent upon those making the claim of fraud to prove it...which so far, they haven't been able to do.

The poster has also bragged on these boards for months how he was going to start a voter fraud thread. Problem is, he knows it would be destroyed in less than 20 posts.
He has no balls. Hence my new nickname for him...cuck.

Yep, only 31% of TEXAS REPUBLICANS believe the Big Lie about widespread voter fraud!

Few Texans believe voting fraud is common, UT/TT poll shows, undercutting GOP rationale for tightening voting rules

With no evidence of widespread voting fraud to cite, Republicans are shifting their argument to insist that new voting restrictions are needed to forestall even isolated instances of ineligible voters casting ballots.

www.texastribune.org

What a bunch of crap that is. Even if true, it will change as the audits expose the massive fraud.

 

[asaratis]

Next I'll be a fascist and a marcist. Then I don't love America.

That's your standard retort against your opponents here. Call them a Nazi.

Fuck off, little boy.

Maybe ewe should speak with your Purge Pal about calling people Nazis

Perhaps you and little Colin norris should get a private room and discuss whatever comes up.

 

[DrLove]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

What a bunch of crap that is. Even if true, it will change as the audits expose the massive fraud.

LoL Lastamender Dems spent all day yesterday asking Texas Rethugs for their evidence of widespread fraud. They had absolutely nothing other than a dozen or so one-offs.

 

[DrLove]

The Purge You are one sad dude in complete & total denial.

You are a cherry picker. Posting ONE video (out of THOUSANDS being held by the FBI) as proof of massive "insurrection" is a sad commentary regarding truth. The FBI was complicit in the entrapment. The FBI works for the liberals these days.

Do you understand how entirely insane that sounds?
Meh, ya don’t - You’re totally down with the Mango Menace, Q, Rudy, MrPillow and that Kracken lady.

At least we have a hint regarding which network will receive the slow leak of selected videos from the FBI.

Video is video. And no, your insurrectionists weren’t tourists, they weren’t peaceful, they didn’t respect property or law enforcement, and they were hardly “patriots”.
And DOUBLE no - The FBI is not in cahoots with Democrats.
You’d better wise up - Janet Weiss!

 

[toobfreak]

toobfreak No Short Buster. “Dismissal” does not address REASONS for dismissal, which in most, but not all of these cases was “Lack of Evidence”.

that's bull and you know it.

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...

EXACTLY, Jack. You, the media and politicians have made the accusation TEN THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES that ALL of the questions, doubts and charges against the Fall election have all been proven BASELESS and have all been thoroughly, COMPLETELY DEBUNKED. PROVIDE THE PROOF OF THAT. That's all. Provide ANYTHING, other than YOUR empty claims.

There was ample time

Ample time? Jack, you are just making yourself the LAUGHING STOCK of USMB making such HORSESHIT bogus claims. They had a few weeks. It will take many weeks if not months just to go over all of the fraud allegations here describing them and simply offering up whatever supporting evidence for or against each one of them by me and others!

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

For better than six months he'd been dealing alt-right links to bullshit election fraud claims.

During that same period, Jack has produced exactly NOTHING to support his claims, all the while LYING saying I had offered up nothing. Now we see Jack is a LIAR.

Now that those have all been batted down

They have? By WHO? WHEN? HOW? SHOW US FUCKER. You lying sick fucker.

Making the claim that it's incumbent upon the people saying fraud didn't happen to prove their claims.

Of course! How can anyone say fraud DIDN'T happen unless they have researched it and proven the claims wrong? THAT IS HOW LEGALITIES ARE HANDLED, Jack. You can't even point to anyone else who has researched and disproven it all much less YOURSELF. Calling something baseless and debunked is an ACCUSAL. A denier of another's condition---- that requires similar proof as those claiming the fraud in the first place, because it carries the implication that your claims are MORE THAN A FUCKING OPINION. Get it, asshole?

Now, ADMIT that it is just YOUR OPINION that the fraud is all baseless, and I can live with that.

Hearings will propagate debunked PA election fraud claims

Above is a typical media report REPLETE with claims of debunking and denials, but NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE pointed to that anyone can hold up and examine to support the writer's claim.