New Evidence Indicates Enough Illegal Votes In Georgia To Tip 2020 Results

[JackOfNoTrades]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened.

WHAT didn't happen, Jack? Why do you talk in riddles?

Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election.

So what? All Trump did was state he knew there was a plan underway to defraud the election to stop him from being reelected, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, as already admitted and published in detail by Time Magazine in February.

Saying you got wind of a plot to rob your house does not alter the fact when indeed, they do come and ROB YOU.

Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman.

All that proves is that relying on the courts to resolve a matter of this SCOPE in so very short a time (a few weeks) is a piss ass failure of a plan to keep elections free and honest. Name a single major court case like OJ, Bill Cosby or any other of national import which was resolved in the court system in just a couple of weeks! NAME IT ASSHOLE!

I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign.

There goes Jack shooting his mouth off again making baseless and unfounded claims with NOTHING he can show to substantiate his accusations. No fingers slammed here, Jack, no misinformation proven, and no conspiracy theories confirmed other than out of the big, fat, puffy lips of your garage-less ASS.

You idiots have parroted these lies long enough.

The only one parroting lies here is YOU, Jack. Put forth how, when and by who all 28 cases brought against the election have been DEBUNKED, not merely thrown out of court declined or dismissed for lack of standing, time of filing or ambiguity of charges.

How to type a lot of shit..and say nothing...except what you've been saying non-stop with nothing to back it up for better than six months.

Every court case dismissed. Deal with it, cuck.

 

[asaratis]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

Speaking of abortions . . . yes, Jack, that is all I ask. PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Since Nov 3 you and the leftwing media and politicians have claimed unchallenged that all questions about the election were not only BASELESS, but thoroughly DEBUNKED (proven wrong). Proving something wrong is a PROCESS which involves TIME and evidence plus WORK.

Never mind that the courts hadn't heard any arguments yet, never mind the admissions of 50 organizations admitting the Steal, all I want is to see now is what work was done by who, how they did it and when, that all you people keep secret from the rest of the world!

PUT UP OR STFU ALREADY.

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

HOW WAS THE FRAUD DEBUNKED?

I will repeat to you it is incumbent upon the side making the accusations to provide the evidence...

EXACTLY, Jack. You, the media and politicians have made the accusation TEN THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES that ALL of the questions, doubts and charges against the Fall election have all been proven BASELESS and have all been thoroughly, COMPLETELY DEBUNKED. PROVIDE THE PROOF OF THAT. That's all. Provide ANYTHING, other than YOUR empty claims.

There was ample time

Ample time? Jack, you are just making yourself the LAUGHING STOCK of USMB making such HORSESHIT bogus claims. They had a few weeks. It will take many weeks if not months just to go over all of the fraud allegations here describing them and simply offering up whatever supporting evidence for or against each one of them by me and others!

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened.

WHAT didn't happen, Jack? Why do you talk in riddles?

Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election.

So what? All Trump did was state he knew there was a plan underway to defraud the election to stop him from being reelected, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, as already admitted and published in detail by Time Magazine in February.

Saying you got wind of a plot to rob your house does not alter the fact when indeed, they do come and ROB YOU.

Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman.

All that proves is that relying on the courts to resolve a matter of this SCOPE in so very short a time (a few weeks) is a piss ass failure of a plan to keep elections free and honest. Name a single major court case like OJ, Bill Cosby or any other of national import which was resolved in the court system in just a couple of weeks! NAME IT ASSHOLE!

I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign.

There goes Jack shooting his mouth off again making baseless and unfounded claims with NOTHING he can show to substantiate his accusations. No fingers slammed here, Jack, no misinformation proven, and no conspiracy theories confirmed other than out of the big, fat, puffy lips of your garage-less ASS.

You idiots have parroted these lies long enough.

The only one parroting lies here is YOU, Jack. Put forth how, when and by who all 28 cases brought against the election have been DEBUNKED, not merely thrown out of court declined or dismissed for lack of standing, time of filing or ambiguity of charges.

How to type a lot of shit..and say nothing...

Only nothing to those like you with your head planted in your ass. You run from the facts like a little girl pissing herself. Still waiting for your documentation on how the fraud was all thoroughly debunked, or was that just one more mass-delusion by the Left?

except what you've been saying non-stop with nothing to back it up for better than six months.

Except the TWENTY-FIVE discrete fraud situations I laid out WITH DOCUMENTATION in Michigan, Jack, that I've linked you to SEVERAL times, that you've never offered a SHRED of evidence to counter even ONE of them.

Post #16 (again), Jack.

......this deserves a stand-alone thread......

I saw a similar piece posted up in one of the nearby threads, but then couldn't locate it. So I thought I'd post it up as a stand-alone thread as it is pretty doggone pertinent to many of the discussion on this venue about 'stolen elections', fraud, yadda, yadda, yadda. It was published this...

www.usmessageboard.com

Sux to be YOU.

 

[meaner gene]

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

It's not just yet to be proven, as if they just need 10 more days like the republicans in congress wanted. It hasn't been proven in any court or any jurisdiction for over 8 months.

Elections are required to be certified within 40 days. And the results made final within 2 months.

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

 

[Care4all]

But very unlikely there is even one, non legitimate, unfolded ballot....

I've seen photos of unfolded ballots ballots that were printed on bogus paper. I've seen photos of multiple unfolded ballots that all appear to have been filled in by a printing machine using the same exact mark in the "Biden" circle...all with the same identical flaw.

I'm not saying these photos are proof yet because the photos themselves could have been be fabricated. However, I believe the Arizona audit included measuring the exact dimensions and the photographing of every ballot that was turned over to the audit workers and this may have been the source of the photographs I saw.

Here is a story about the Pristine identical ballots. (It dies not include photos. I saw them in another article.) Note also that some of these fake mailed-in ballots showed no evidence of ever being folded.

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed

When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R.

www.realclearinvestigations.com

The final report from Maricopa County forensic audit is supposed to be issued in August. We shall see what they found in that one county.

It is encouraging to me that several of the states that visited the Arizona audit process have decided to promote their own audits. I'm guessing the visiting representatives were made aware of some of the findings.

That's what I was talking about.... I had read that It has something to do with the overseas vote of certain military....they have a system set up, I believe it was for service members onships or subs, where they can print their requested ballot online and use regular paper to print the blank ballots, that they fill out and mail in... The article said that certain vote counting machines do not register the thinner weight of copy paper as legit and rejects these overseas military ballots.

The article said that depending on where you are in the state, either a new ballot copying the mailed in ballot on the copy paper from the submarine man that machines reject is made, either by copying by hand with reps from all parties present, OR IN BIGGER populated areas, they have machines that are fed the copy weight paper ballots and photographic ally copy them on to new ballots on the proper weight paper, by machine....which is also monitored by live party participants.

I think that above will likely be, what this is all about...

Of course it was over a month ago when I read about all of this and i believe it was an actual court case that I read all of this or the explanation given etc....??? I may be able to find a link on it, if I have the patience and spare time....

I think that the ones that copy the military vote from these specific locations by machine, would show to be more uniformed in nature?

But as I stated, these newly copied ballots would not have folds, yet every one, will have a sister ballot that was folded and mailed in, and a log on it being copied.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

I never call anyone a cuckhold, but when one accuses, I know he has battery clamps on his nipples while pegged

What you do in the privacy of your own house...stays in your house. Don't bring me into your fantasies.

LOLOL

EWWWW....................The thought of that would make me impotent for at least a week

 

[meaner gene]

Except the TWENTY-FIVE discrete fraud situations I laid out WITH DOCUMENTATION in Michigan, Jack, that Ive linked you to SEVERAL times, that you;ve never offered a SHRED of evidence to counter even ONE of them.

Sux to be YOU.

And you haven't offered a shred of evidence to substantiate any of those bogus numbers. You point to sites that have the same proofs as Trumps lawyers presented to the courts, and claim nobody looked at them, rather than admit they were reviewed by competent jurists, and found they didn't prove the claim.

 

[meaner gene]

The article said that depending on where you are in the state, either a new ballot copying the mailed in ballot on the copy paper from the submarine man that machines reject is made, either by copying by hand with reps from all parties present, OR IN BIGGER populated areas, they have machines that are fed the copy weight paper ballots and photographic ally copy them on to new ballots on the proper weight paper, by machine....which is also monitored by live party participants.

They are likely to pick up a thousand perfectly legitimate ballots that fall outside the "norm" because of origins like overseas military mailed or faxed ballots.

I can't wait for cyberninjas to audit a sausage factory,

 

[DrLove]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

I never call anyone a cuckhold, but when one accuses, I know he has battery clamps on his nipples while pegged

What you do in the privacy of your own house...stays in your house. Don't bring me into your fantasies.

You into electrified nip clamps Sloop? Enjoy man!

 

[Lastamender]

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

It's not just yet to be proven, as if they just need 10 more days like the republicans in congress wanted. It hasn't been proven in any court or any jurisdiction for over 8 months.

Elections are required to be certified within 40 days. And the results made final within 2 months.

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

Fraud throws all that out the window. Audits are not rule changes.

 

[DrLove]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened.

WHAT didn't happen, Jack? Why do you talk in riddles?

Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election.

So what? All Trump did was state he knew there was a plan underway to defraud the election to stop him from being reelected, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, as already admitted and published in detail by Time Magazine in February.

Saying you got wind of a plot to rob your house does not alter the fact when indeed, they do come and ROB YOU.

Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman.

All that proves is that relying on the courts to resolve a matter of this SCOPE in so very short a time (a few weeks) is a piss ass failure of a plan to keep elections free and honest. Name a single major court case like OJ, Bill Cosby or any other of national import which was resolved in the court system in just a couple of weeks! NAME IT ASSHOLE!

I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign.

There goes Jack shooting his mouth off again making baseless and unfounded claims with NOTHING he can show to substantiate his accusations. No fingers slammed here, Jack, no misinformation proven, and no conspiracy theories confirmed other than out of the big, fat, puffy lips of your garage-less ASS.

You idiots have parroted these lies long enough.

The only one parroting lies here is YOU, Jack. Put forth how, when and by who all 28 cases brought against the election have been DEBUNKED, not merely thrown out of court declined or dismissed for lack of standing, time of filing or ambiguity of charges.

How to type a lot of shit..and say nothing...except what you've been saying non-stop with nothing to back it up for better than six months.

Every court case dismissed. Deal with it, cuck.

Mebbe but nobody types more & says less than PoliticalChic
Oh wait .. she just cuts n pastes. Never mind!

 

[toobfreak]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened.

WHAT didn't happen, Jack? Why do you talk in riddles?

Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election.

So what? All Trump did was state he knew there was a plan underway to defraud the election to stop him from being reelected, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, as already admitted and published in detail by Time Magazine in February.

Saying you got wind of a plot to rob your house does not alter the fact when indeed, they do come and ROB YOU.

Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman.

All that proves is that relying on the courts to resolve a matter of this SCOPE in so very short a time (a few weeks) is a piss ass failure of a plan to keep elections free and honest. Name a single major court case like OJ, Bill Cosby or any other of national import which was resolved in the court system in just a couple of weeks! NAME IT ASSHOLE!

I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign.

There goes Jack shooting his mouth off again making baseless and unfounded claims with NOTHING he can show to substantiate his accusations. No fingers slammed here, Jack, no misinformation proven, and no conspiracy theories confirmed other than out of the big, fat, puffy lips of your garage-less ASS.

You idiots have parroted these lies long enough.

The only one parroting lies here is YOU, Jack. Put forth how, when and by who all 28 cases brought against the election have been DEBUNKED, not merely thrown out of court declined or dismissed for lack of standing, time of filing or ambiguity of charges.

How to type a lot of shit..and say nothing...except what you've been saying non-stop with nothing to back it up for better than six months.

Every court case dismissed. Deal with it, cuck.

Mebbe but nobody types more & says less than PoliticalChic
Oh wait .. she just cuts n pastes. Never mind!

BTW, that is just another lie: every court case was NOT dismissed. Jack lies so much he even believes himself.

 

[Colin norris]

https://thefederalist.com ^ | By Margot Cleveland JULY 9, 2021

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications. Also like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote. These facts, coupled with the closeness of the presidential contest in Georgia and other states, led to a flurry of accusations and litigation charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violations of the Elector’s Clause of the constitution.

In Georgia, there was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden’s victory, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.

Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Casting Doubt on Potential Illegal Votes Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

The Data Speaks for Itself When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

Davis’s data proves significant because critics of Trump’s challenge to the certification of Georgia’s election results framed the NCOA information as either unreliable or of an insufficient magnitude to cast the outcome of the election in doubt. But by updating their voter registration information with the same address as contained in the NCOA database, the voters themselves have established the reliability of that information.

Further, by updating their address for purposes of their voter registration, these same voters are confirming their move is not temporary. “When a person updates their voter registration to a new address, they are informing the county board of elections and correspondingly the Secretary of State that they regard the new address as their legal residence,” Evans explained.

What Do Georgia Officials Know? Upon learning of this new development, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office quietly opened an investigation into potentially illegal voting by residents who had moved between counties. Davis provided his data to the office in May, with a detailed explanation of his analysis. Yet during my interview last week with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, he seemed unfamiliar with this most recent evidence of illegal voting.

Immediately following the interview, both his press secretary, Walter Jones, and his deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs, called me back to follow up on my questions on the status of that investigation. While Jones spoke favorably of Davis, he suggested that Davis’s figure included “false-positives” because Davis lacked access to Social Security numbers and birth dates of voters, and thus Davis’s list likely included different individuals bearing the same name. Fuchs suggested a similar issue with Davis’s analysis.

“There is no need to have access to Social Security numbers or birth dates,” Davis told me. “Every voter has a unique eight-digit voter identification number,” Davis explained that these voter identification numbers tie to the voters’ names and addresses and to vote-history data, which documents when and where their votes are cast and comes from the secretary of state’s own data.

Davis provided access to that data, following the execution of a non-disclosure agreement, and I confirmed Davis’s representation. Davis also provided processing certification verifying receipt of the NCOA data.

“I provided this exact same information to Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the secretary of state,” Davis told me, sharing a copy of the email sent to Watson.

When asked for the status of Watson’s investigation and other details, while both were receptive to questions, neither Jones nor Fuchs could provide definitive answers. While on Friday Fuchs promised to give Watson permission to speak with me, and while both the deputy secretary of state and the press secretary promised to arrange an interview with Watson and to track down answers to several questions, to date, no further information has been provided and no interview has been arranged, notwithstanding several follow-up communications.

Hopefully, that is because Watson is busy investigating the strong evidence of illegal voting and not because the Secretary of State’s Office is attempting to bury the story — and the fact that Trump might have been right after all — until after Raffensperger fights off a primary challenge.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

-------------------

“While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. “

In other words: “Yes, we stole the election, but it’s too late now and there’s nothing you can do about it. Better luck next time.”

Us: “Oh well, OK, den...”

Why would those votes be ignored? They weren't. It's bullshit.

 

[Care4all]

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

It's not just yet to be proven, as if they just need 10 more days like the republicans in congress wanted. It hasn't been proven in any court or any jurisdiction for over 8 months.

Elections are required to be certified within 40 days. And the results made final within 2 months.

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

Fraud throws all that out the window. Audits are not rule changes.

Legitimate audits are done by independent, certified election auditors. It's too bad the Arizona republicans wasted their time with their partisan, unqualified, cyber ninjas who won't be considered legit.

 

[meaner gene]

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

Fraud throws all that out the window. Audits are not rule changes.

Then they should have thought about that before the election. The laws allowing the audits can't retroactively allow the results of the audit to change the outcome of the election.

 

[DrLove]

No laws were broken. There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it. Move on. Believing in fantasies coming true and your alt-right sources lying to you just isn't healthy. Can you believe it? The election was over 9 months ago. Apparently we're gonna have to listen to this bullshit for HOW many more years?

Forever until you come clean or we bust your heinies. You know what you did, and WE know what you did. What, are you waiting like Hillary and the Benghazi and other investigations to simply drag it out until years have past then claim what "old news" it is and therefore, "settled," because you drug your feet forever holding back the evidence?

All you schmucks have been running your mouths since just a few days after the election all running your stinking mouths at how all of the fraud claims were either BASELESS or DEBUNKED, in EVERY report, on EVERY channel, but no one can get an answer out of ANY of you just HOW any of you KNOW this, just HOW it was found or proven baseless, HOW it was debunked, by WHO and WHEN.

That is a CLAIM, it is an allegation, it is an ACCUSATION---- just as the fraud was and still grows in support every day, yet somehow you cretins think you have no burden of proof to back up YOUR claims while thinking that others do!

WHEN WILL YOU LYING FUCKERS QUIT EXPOSING YOUR FRAUD BY CONTINUALLY ALWAYS HOLDING OTHERS TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF RULES THAN YOU DO FOR YOURSELVES?

You're just yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs that the other side hasn't proven there WASN'T any fraud.

No, YOU deal with it bud. Do you just ACT stupid and dense Jack or are you really that opaque and circuitous?

For the 9000th time Jack, the Left have claimed TEN THOUSAND TIMES since practically the night of the election that the fraud cases were all BASELESS and DEBUNKED.

BASELESS is a summary charge aimed at implying some investigative effort was taken.

DEBUNKED is a claim of some ACTION taken which proved conclusively a thing wasn't real.

Try making such claims in a court of law with nothing to back it up.

It would be easier to pull Excalibur's emblazoned magical sword from the stone than to get one of you lying jackals to present the secret evidence of HOW, WHERE, WHEN and by WHO all this incredible detective work occurred, especially since it is taking months just to audit one state!

Particularly incredible considering these claims started LONG BEFORE any court cases, and considering 50 organizations long ago TOOK CREDIT for the steal!

Obviously, if there WAS any such proof, it would have been presented long ago.

Put up or STFU. Or stop responding to my posts, cuck.

You are the one with the problem. Fraud is just a conspiracy, right? What are you doing here going on about something you say did not happen?

Because nothing happened.

WHAT didn't happen, Jack? Why do you talk in riddles?

Your savior telegraphed his intention to press the fraud argument months before the election.

So what? All Trump did was state he knew there was a plan underway to defraud the election to stop him from being reelected, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, as already admitted and published in detail by Time Magazine in February.

Saying you got wind of a plot to rob your house does not alter the fact when indeed, they do come and ROB YOU.

Again, your redress (and his) was through the courts immediately after the election and they slammed the door on you to a man and woman.

All that proves is that relying on the courts to resolve a matter of this SCOPE in so very short a time (a few weeks) is a piss ass failure of a plan to keep elections free and honest. Name a single major court case like OJ, Bill Cosby or any other of national import which was resolved in the court system in just a couple of weeks! NAME IT ASSHOLE!

I am on here to slam your fingers in the car door of your constant misinformation and conspiracy theory laden campaign.

There goes Jack shooting his mouth off again making baseless and unfounded claims with NOTHING he can show to substantiate his accusations. No fingers slammed here, Jack, no misinformation proven, and no conspiracy theories confirmed other than out of the big, fat, puffy lips of your garage-less ASS.

You idiots have parroted these lies long enough.

The only one parroting lies here is YOU, Jack. Put forth how, when and by who all 28 cases brought against the election have been DEBUNKED, not merely thrown out of court declined or dismissed for lack of standing, time of filing or ambiguity of charges.

How to type a lot of shit..and say nothing...except what you've been saying non-stop with nothing to back it up for better than six months.

Every court case dismissed. Deal with it, cuck.

Mebbe but nobody types more & says less than PoliticalChic
Oh wait .. she just cuts n pastes. Never mind!

BTW, that is just another lie: every court case was NOT dismissed. Jack lies so much he even believes himself.

Dismissal is not really a proper technical term. Lack of evidence, lack of standing, & missing “safe harbor” deadlines more appropriate. Learn something - Rudy

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

 

[Lastamender]

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

It's not just yet to be proven, as if they just need 10 more days like the republicans in congress wanted. It hasn't been proven in any court or any jurisdiction for over 8 months.

Elections are required to be certified within 40 days. And the results made final within 2 months.

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

Fraud throws all that out the window. Audits are not rule changes.

Legitimate audits are done by independent, certified election auditors. It's too bad the Arizona republicans wasted their time with their partisan, unqualified, cyber ninjas who won't be considered legit.

Not with the people they are auditing there. It is called a severe conflict of interest and not acceptable.

 

[asaratis]

But very unlikely there is even one, non legitimate, unfolded ballot....

I've seen photos of unfolded ballots ballots that were printed on bogus paper. I've seen photos of multiple unfolded ballots that all appear to have been filled in by a printing machine using the same exact mark in the "Biden" circle...all with the same identical flaw.

I'm not saying these photos are proof yet because the photos themselves could have been be fabricated. However, I believe the Arizona audit included measuring the exact dimensions and the photographing of every ballot that was turned over to the audit workers and this may have been the source of the photographs I saw.

Here is a story about the Pristine identical ballots. (It dies not include photos. I saw them in another article.) Note also that some of these fake mailed-in ballots showed no evidence of ever being folded.

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed

When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R.

www.realclearinvestigations.com

The final report from Maricopa County forensic audit is supposed to be issued in August. We shall see what they found in that one county.

It is encouraging to me that several of the states that visited the Arizona audit process have decided to promote their own audits. I'm guessing the visiting representatives were made aware of some of the findings.

That's what I was talking about.... I had read that It has something to do with the overseas vote of certain military....they have a system set up, I believe it was for service members onships or subs, where they can print their requested ballot online and use regular paper to print the blank ballots, that they fill out and mail in... The article said that certain vote counting machines do not register the thinner weight of copy paper as legit and rejects these overseas military ballots.

The article said that depending on where you are in the state, either a new ballot copying the mailed in ballot on the copy paper from the submarine man that machines reject is made, either by copying by hand with reps from all parties present, OR IN BIGGER populated areas, they have machines that are fed the copy weight paper ballots and photographic ally copy them on to new ballots on the proper weight paper, by machine....which is also monitored by live party participants.

I think that above will likely be, what this is all about...

Of course it was over a month ago when I read about all of this and i believe it was an actual court case that I read all of this or the explanation given etc....??? I may be able to find a link on it, if I have the patience and spare time....

I think that the ones that copy the military vote from these specific locations by machine, would show to be more uniformed in nature?

But as I stated, these newly copied ballots would not have folds, yet every one, will have a sister ballot that was folded and mailed in, and a log on it being copied.

So far that's all hearsay to me. Without a link to a credible article, it is nothing more than supposition.

...and you made no mention of the identical voting marks that were identical and looked to be printed. That wouldn't have happened even on copies of individual ballots marker by the voters.

The fact that multiple examiners of thee ballots convinced a judge to order delivery of all the mail in ballots speaks volumes related to the possibility of fraud.

Aside from that, I see no logical reason for allowing anyone, including the military to copy the ballots at all.

Considering the treatment that our poll observers received, I scoff at your supposition that:

The article said that depending on where you are in the state, either a new ballot copying the mailed in ballot on the copy paper from the submarine man that machines reject is made, either by copying by hand with reps from all parties present, OR IN BIGGER populated areas, they have machines that are fed the copy weight paper ballots and photographic ally copy them on to new ballots on the proper weight paper, by machine....which is also monitored by live party participants.

The assholes running the show in Georgia wouldn't let the partisan observers near enough to read what was on the ballots.

You seem to be trying to blow smoke up my dress.

You clearly do not understand what it's like in Fulton County, Georgia.

 

[DrLove]

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

It's not just yet to be proven, as if they just need 10 more days like the republicans in congress wanted. It hasn't been proven in any court or any jurisdiction for over 8 months.

Elections are required to be certified within 40 days. And the results made final within 2 months.

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

Fraud throws all that out the window. Audits are not rule changes.

Legitimate audits are done by independent, certified election auditors. It's too bad the Arizona republicans wasted their time with their partisan, unqualified, cyber ninjas who won't be considered legit.

Not with the people they are auditing there. It is called a severe conflict of interest and not acceptable.

Oh dear Lasty. Can’t wait to see your lil duck dance when the Q-Kook Fraudit tells you precisely what we all KNOW they will tell you!

 

[Lastamender]

JackOff is one of many idiots who believe that their denying of a yet to be proven claim debunks it. His is really not capable of understanding what you mean here.

It's not just yet to be proven, as if they just need 10 more days like the republicans in congress wanted. It hasn't been proven in any court or any jurisdiction for over 8 months.

Elections are required to be certified within 40 days. And the results made final within 2 months.

The audits are actually a violation of Bush v Gore, which says you can't change the rules during an election,. So you certainly can't change the rules months after the election is over.

Fraud throws all that out the window. Audits are not rule changes.

Legitimate audits are done by independent, certified election auditors. It's too bad the Arizona republicans wasted their time with their partisan, unqualified, cyber ninjas who won't be considered legit.

Not with the people they are auditing there. It is called a severe conflict of interest and not acceptable.

Oh dear Lasty. Can’t wait to see your lil duck dance when the Q-Kook Fraudit tells you precisely what we all KNOW they will tell you!

They will tell you too. Pay attention and you will not need to bother me.