Nevada to join National Popular Vote compact

[BlackFlag]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

 

[Pete7469]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

 

[bodecea]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

Nevada is getting better and better. Now it also has a majority of women in its state legislature.

 

[bodecea]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

IF you had ever read the Constitution....Article II in particular....you would have known that it is the states that determine how to distribute Electoral College votes. IF you had ever read the Constitution, you would have known this is totally Constitutional. IF.

 

[BlackFlag]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

No rules changed, snowflake

 

[The Original Tree]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

 

[rightwinger]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

Welcome aboard Nevada!

 

[rightwinger]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Such a Snowflake

You don’t understand the rules, do you?

 

[The Original Tree]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

IF you had ever read the Constitution....Article II in particular....you would have known that it is the states that determine how to distribute Electoral College votes. IF you had ever read the Constitution, you would have known this is totally Constitutional. IF.

Dumbass.

The State cannot distribute Electoral Votes to someone that loses the election in that state.

The National Presidential Election is 50 Independent Elections.

You cannot award The Loser of a State your Electoral Votes.

 

[BlackFlag]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

 

[BlackFlag]

Dumbass.

The State cannot distribute Electoral Votes to someone that loses the election in that state.

They certainly can, snowflake

 

[The Original Tree]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

 

[BlackFlag]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

Not unconstitutional. Ignorance may be really appealing to you, but it won’t help you.

Californians can always elect a new government that will change their stance.

 

[The Original Tree]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

Not unconstitutional. Ignorance may be really appealing to you, but it won’t help you.

Californians can always elect a new government that will change their stance.

WRONG

Let's say Trump loses the state of New York but wins The Popular Vote.

Exactly how is New York going to be allowed to give Trump all of it's Electoral Votes despite the fact Trump Lost that state to the DemTard Challenger?

Care to explain that?

If you are so worried about The Popular Vote then pass Voter ID.

That way no Russians can vote, Right?

 

[BlackFlag]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

Not unconstitutional. Ignorance may be really appealing to you, but it won’t help you.

Californians can always elect a new government that will change their stance.

WRONG

Let's say Trump loses the state of New York and wins The Popular Vote.

Exactly how is New York going to be allowed to give Trump all of it's Electoral Votes despite the fact Trump Lost that state to the DemTard Challenger?

Care to explain that?

By having their electors vote for Trump. This is not hard.

 

[The Original Tree]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

Not unconstitutional. Ignorance may be really appealing to you, but it won’t help you.

Californians can always elect a new government that will change their stance.

WRONG

Let's say Trump loses the state of New York and wins The Popular Vote.

Exactly how is New York going to be allowed to give Trump all of it's Electoral Votes despite the fact Trump Lost that state to the DemTard Challenger?

Care to explain that?

By having their electors vote for Trump. This is not hard.

But that violates entirely the principle of faithful electors moron, who are Constitutionally Charged with allotting their Electoral Votes to the Winner of each states election, NOT THE LOSER.

Were you dropped on your head as a child?

And like All Libtards, you are about 4 years too late.

This is Unconstitutional, but even if it holds up, Trump will win The Popular Vote this time around, and you idiots are going to be burning down the entire states of California and New York as you are forced to give your Electoral Votes to Trump, even though he lost those states.

The Liberal Radical Fanatics will destroy The DemNazi states who are forced to give their votes to Trump. You people are like that. You burn your own houses and communities to The Ground when you can't get what you want.

I'll even buy the gasoline. Go on with it, Lib Tard.

 

[Thinker101]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

Not unconstitutional. Ignorance may be really appealing to you, but it won’t help you.

Californians can always elect a new government that will change their stance.

WRONG

Let's say Trump loses the state of New York and wins The Popular Vote.

Exactly how is New York going to be allowed to give Trump all of it's Electoral Votes despite the fact Trump Lost that state to the DemTard Challenger?

Care to explain that?

By having their electors vote for Trump. This is not hard.

Great, so what's the plan when that happens? Whine more that it's not fair?

 

[Meister]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

 

[BlackFlag]

But that violates entirely the principle of faithful electors moron, who are Constitutionally Charged with allotting their Electoral Votes to the Winner of each states election, NOT THE LOSER.

You completely fabricated that. Post the line in the constitution that forces electors to vote with the popular vote of their state, or go troll another thread. Further content-less troll posts and personal attacks will be reported.

 

[BlackFlag]

Nope. States can allocate electoral votes however they want

So If Trump Loses California, but wins the popular vote this next election California has to give Trump All of it's Electoral Votes?

Do you know how idiotic that is?

That is depriving the entire State of California Representation.

Totally Unconstitutional.

More Proof that you are an idiot.

Not unconstitutional. Ignorance may be really appealing to you, but it won’t help you.

Californians can always elect a new government that will change their stance.

WRONG

Let's say Trump loses the state of New York and wins The Popular Vote.

Exactly how is New York going to be allowed to give Trump all of it's Electoral Votes despite the fact Trump Lost that state to the DemTard Challenger?

Care to explain that?

By having their electors vote for Trump. This is not hard.

Great, so what's the plan when that happens? Whine more that it's not fair?

I will consider it fair, and the country will deserve the consequences it suffers from reelecting your fat traitor, just as we did when we reelected Dubya.