NBC Reporter: DNA Test Is Proof That Tomahawk Liz Committed 'Some Level of Fraud'

[The Purge]

Without doubt, somewhere along the line in the fraudulent misrepresentation of herself, she’d have encountered that pesky ‘under penalty of perjury’ phrase with its accompanying warning re ‘subject to a term of imprisonment of ____ and a fine not to exceed $____’.


Read more
Townhall.com ^

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) released her DNA tests recently, and it showed what we’ve known for years: she’s not really Native American. The allegation has hung around her neck since 2012. Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t. She is 1/1024th Native American. I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none. All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

If this is the new benchmark established by liberals to shield their own from terrible acts of cultural appropriation for personal gain, then I guess we can be whomever the hell we want.

So, what to make of this? Well, NBC reporter Jonathan Allen was on The Bill Press Show yesterday, where he said that at some level, Warren committed an act of fraud (via Free Beacon) [emphasis mine]:


NBC political reporter Jon Allen said Wednesday that Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) DNA test, which she could be between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American, shows she committed "some level of fraud" by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action.

"The people that are most offended by this are people who believe in affirmation action," Allen said during an interview on the "Bill Press Show," "because they're like, ‘Elizabeth Warren didn't need affirmative action.' She perpetrated some level of fraud, and that hurts affirmative action."

"She wanted to get it behind her before the midterms," Allen said when explaining why she did the DNA test and announced the results at all, "so she could have a clean slate to go in."

[…]

Warren released the results of her DNA test on Oct. 15, framing the results as confirmation of her Native American identity. Cherokee Nation issued a statement in response, saying DNA tests have no bearing on tribal affiliation and that her actions were "undermining tribal interests."

[…]

"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong," his statement continued. "It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Elizabeth Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

Now, how has this impacted Warren? Well, about half of the voters polled by Politico have not changed their opinion of her (via Politico):


Roughly half of voters — 49 percent — say Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s decision to release the results of a DNA test indicating she has some Native American ancestry makes no difference in their view of her, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Prompted in part by President Donald Trump’s derisive references to her as “Pocahontas,” the Massachusetts senator made her DNA test results public last week, which indicate there is "strong evidence" she had a Native American in her family dating back 6 to 10 generations ago. Controversy over her ancestry has dogged the Massachusetts Democrat since she ran for Senate against former Republican Sen. Scott Brown in 2012 and the move was widely seen as an effort to help clear the path for a prospective 2020 presidential run.

[…]

Forty percent of voters surveyed nationally said the test’s release shifted their view in some way — 16 percent said it made their impression of Warren more favorable, while 24 percent said they view her less favorably.

Broken down by party, 57 percent of Democrats said Warren's big reveal made "no difference" in their opinion of her. The same was true for 40 percent of Republicans surveyed. Morning Consult polled 1,968 registered voters was conducted online Oct. 18 and Oct. 19, several days after the DNA test news broke. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points.

So, after years of harassing, protesting, and whining about so-called cultural appropriation, the Left is circling the wagons around a white woman who straight up committed the worst sin for this beautiful mess of an ideologyú They’re defending a white woman taking a racial status that’s not hers in any way, shape, or form. Oh, and you bet that Warren isn’t apologizing for it. What a time to be alive, but also shows how Democrats continue to fail miserably to police their own. Lie-a-Watha has been exposed at least.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So what? So she lied? What's the big deal?

Her moral compass has no directional needle, so her North is whereever she points

 

[Pogo]

Without doubt, somewhere along the line in the fraudulent misrepresentation of herself, she’d have encountered that pesky ‘under penalty of perjury’ phrase with its accompanying warning re ‘subject to a term of imprisonment of ____ and a fine not to exceed $____’.


Read more
Townhall.com ^

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) released her DNA tests recently, and it showed what we’ve known for years: she’s not really Native American. The allegation has hung around her neck since 2012. Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t. She is 1/1024th Native American. I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none. All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

If this is the new benchmark established by liberals to shield their own from terrible acts of cultural appropriation for personal gain, then I guess we can be whomever the hell we want.

So, what to make of this? Well, NBC reporter Jonathan Allen was on The Bill Press Show yesterday, where he said that at some level, Warren committed an act of fraud (via Free Beacon) [emphasis mine]:


NBC political reporter Jon Allen said Wednesday that Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) DNA test, which she could be between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American, shows she committed "some level of fraud" by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action.

"The people that are most offended by this are people who believe in affirmation action," Allen said during an interview on the "Bill Press Show," "because they're like, ‘Elizabeth Warren didn't need affirmative action.' She perpetrated some level of fraud, and that hurts affirmative action."

"She wanted to get it behind her before the midterms," Allen said when explaining why she did the DNA test and announced the results at all, "so she could have a clean slate to go in."

[…]

Warren released the results of her DNA test on Oct. 15, framing the results as confirmation of her Native American identity. Cherokee Nation issued a statement in response, saying DNA tests have no bearing on tribal affiliation and that her actions were "undermining tribal interests."

[…]

"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong," his statement continued. "It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Elizabeth Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

Now, how has this impacted Warren? Well, about half of the voters polled by Politico have not changed their opinion of her (via Politico):


Roughly half of voters — 49 percent — say Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s decision to release the results of a DNA test indicating she has some Native American ancestry makes no difference in their view of her, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Prompted in part by President Donald Trump’s derisive references to her as “Pocahontas,” the Massachusetts senator made her DNA test results public last week, which indicate there is "strong evidence" she had a Native American in her family dating back 6 to 10 generations ago. Controversy over her ancestry has dogged the Massachusetts Democrat since she ran for Senate against former Republican Sen. Scott Brown in 2012 and the move was widely seen as an effort to help clear the path for a prospective 2020 presidential run.

[…]

Forty percent of voters surveyed nationally said the test’s release shifted their view in some way — 16 percent said it made their impression of Warren more favorable, while 24 percent said they view her less favorably.

Broken down by party, 57 percent of Democrats said Warren's big reveal made "no difference" in their opinion of her. The same was true for 40 percent of Republicans surveyed. Morning Consult polled 1,968 registered voters was conducted online Oct. 18 and Oct. 19, several days after the DNA test news broke. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points.

So, after years of harassing, protesting, and whining about so-called cultural appropriation, the Left is circling the wagons around a white woman who straight up committed the worst sin for this beautiful mess of an ideologyú They’re defending a white woman taking a racial status that’s not hers in any way, shape, or form. Oh, and you bet that Warren isn’t apologizing for it. What a time to be alive, but also shows how Democrats continue to fail miserably to police their own. Lie-a-Watha has been exposed at least.

Oh fucking bullshit ThePuke. Your OP is completely full of unmitigated horseshit.

Let's just take the first paragraph, shall we.

Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t.

The fuck she doesn't. It showed up in that report, now didn't it.

She is 1/1024th Native American

Not only did you just contradict yourself but that isn't what that report says.

I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none.

And who the fuck are you?

Doesn't matter -- the same report deliberately did a comparison with control groups of typically non-NA Europeans and found the samples to have over ten times the level of NA genomes as that control group had. So your post is utter BULLSHIT.

All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

Haha, you spelled "blame" wrong, illiterate sheep.

 

[westwall]

Without doubt, somewhere along the line in the fraudulent misrepresentation of herself, she’d have encountered that pesky ‘under penalty of perjury’ phrase with its accompanying warning re ‘subject to a term of imprisonment of ____ and a fine not to exceed $____’.


Read more
Townhall.com ^

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) released her DNA tests recently, and it showed what we’ve known for years: she’s not really Native American. The allegation has hung around her neck since 2012. Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t. She is 1/1024th Native American. I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none. All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

If this is the new benchmark established by liberals to shield their own from terrible acts of cultural appropriation for personal gain, then I guess we can be whomever the hell we want.

So, what to make of this? Well, NBC reporter Jonathan Allen was on The Bill Press Show yesterday, where he said that at some level, Warren committed an act of fraud (via Free Beacon) [emphasis mine]:


NBC political reporter Jon Allen said Wednesday that Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) DNA test, which she could be between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American, shows she committed "some level of fraud" by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action.

"The people that are most offended by this are people who believe in affirmation action," Allen said during an interview on the "Bill Press Show," "because they're like, ‘Elizabeth Warren didn't need affirmative action.' She perpetrated some level of fraud, and that hurts affirmative action."

"She wanted to get it behind her before the midterms," Allen said when explaining why she did the DNA test and announced the results at all, "so she could have a clean slate to go in."

[…]

Warren released the results of her DNA test on Oct. 15, framing the results as confirmation of her Native American identity. Cherokee Nation issued a statement in response, saying DNA tests have no bearing on tribal affiliation and that her actions were "undermining tribal interests."

[…]

"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong," his statement continued. "It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Elizabeth Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

Now, how has this impacted Warren? Well, about half of the voters polled by Politico have not changed their opinion of her (via Politico):


Roughly half of voters — 49 percent — say Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s decision to release the results of a DNA test indicating she has some Native American ancestry makes no difference in their view of her, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Prompted in part by President Donald Trump’s derisive references to her as “Pocahontas,” the Massachusetts senator made her DNA test results public last week, which indicate there is "strong evidence" she had a Native American in her family dating back 6 to 10 generations ago. Controversy over her ancestry has dogged the Massachusetts Democrat since she ran for Senate against former Republican Sen. Scott Brown in 2012 and the move was widely seen as an effort to help clear the path for a prospective 2020 presidential run.

[…]

Forty percent of voters surveyed nationally said the test’s release shifted their view in some way — 16 percent said it made their impression of Warren more favorable, while 24 percent said they view her less favorably.

Broken down by party, 57 percent of Democrats said Warren's big reveal made "no difference" in their opinion of her. The same was true for 40 percent of Republicans surveyed. Morning Consult polled 1,968 registered voters was conducted online Oct. 18 and Oct. 19, several days after the DNA test news broke. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points.

So, after years of harassing, protesting, and whining about so-called cultural appropriation, the Left is circling the wagons around a white woman who straight up committed the worst sin for this beautiful mess of an ideologyú They’re defending a white woman taking a racial status that’s not hers in any way, shape, or form. Oh, and you bet that Warren isn’t apologizing for it. What a time to be alive, but also shows how Democrats continue to fail miserably to police their own. Lie-a-Watha has been exposed at least.

Oh fucking bullshit ThePuke. Your OP is completely full of unmitigated horseshit.

Let's just take the first paragraph, shall we.

Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t.

The fuck she doesn't. It showed up in that report, now didn't it.

She is 1/1024th Native American

Not only did you just contradict yourself but that isn't what that report says.

I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none.

And who the fuck are you?

Doesn't matter -- the same report deliberately did a comparison with control groups of typically non-NA Europeans and found the samples to have over ten times the level of NA genomes as that control group had. So your post is utter BULLSHIT.

All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

Haha, you spelled "blame" wrong, illiterate sheep.

Actually, i believe the DNA showed she may have some South American native in her tree....a long, long, long way back in her tree. She is less native American than the average human living here today. That says she ain't.

 

[Stratford57]

Go, go, go. Gone!

 

[Pogo]

Without doubt, somewhere along the line in the fraudulent misrepresentation of herself, she’d have encountered that pesky ‘under penalty of perjury’ phrase with its accompanying warning re ‘subject to a term of imprisonment of ____ and a fine not to exceed $____’.


Read more
Townhall.com ^

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) released her DNA tests recently, and it showed what we’ve known for years: she’s not really Native American. The allegation has hung around her neck since 2012. Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t. She is 1/1024th Native American. I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none. All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

If this is the new benchmark established by liberals to shield their own from terrible acts of cultural appropriation for personal gain, then I guess we can be whomever the hell we want.

So, what to make of this? Well, NBC reporter Jonathan Allen was on The Bill Press Show yesterday, where he said that at some level, Warren committed an act of fraud (via Free Beacon) [emphasis mine]:


NBC political reporter Jon Allen said Wednesday that Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) DNA test, which she could be between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American, shows she committed "some level of fraud" by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action.

"The people that are most offended by this are people who believe in affirmation action," Allen said during an interview on the "Bill Press Show," "because they're like, ‘Elizabeth Warren didn't need affirmative action.' She perpetrated some level of fraud, and that hurts affirmative action."

"She wanted to get it behind her before the midterms," Allen said when explaining why she did the DNA test and announced the results at all, "so she could have a clean slate to go in."

[…]

Warren released the results of her DNA test on Oct. 15, framing the results as confirmation of her Native American identity. Cherokee Nation issued a statement in response, saying DNA tests have no bearing on tribal affiliation and that her actions were "undermining tribal interests."

[…]

"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong," his statement continued. "It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Elizabeth Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

Now, how has this impacted Warren? Well, about half of the voters polled by Politico have not changed their opinion of her (via Politico):


Roughly half of voters — 49 percent — say Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s decision to release the results of a DNA test indicating she has some Native American ancestry makes no difference in their view of her, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Prompted in part by President Donald Trump’s derisive references to her as “Pocahontas,” the Massachusetts senator made her DNA test results public last week, which indicate there is "strong evidence" she had a Native American in her family dating back 6 to 10 generations ago. Controversy over her ancestry has dogged the Massachusetts Democrat since she ran for Senate against former Republican Sen. Scott Brown in 2012 and the move was widely seen as an effort to help clear the path for a prospective 2020 presidential run.

[…]

Forty percent of voters surveyed nationally said the test’s release shifted their view in some way — 16 percent said it made their impression of Warren more favorable, while 24 percent said they view her less favorably.

Broken down by party, 57 percent of Democrats said Warren's big reveal made "no difference" in their opinion of her. The same was true for 40 percent of Republicans surveyed. Morning Consult polled 1,968 registered voters was conducted online Oct. 18 and Oct. 19, several days after the DNA test news broke. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points.

So, after years of harassing, protesting, and whining about so-called cultural appropriation, the Left is circling the wagons around a white woman who straight up committed the worst sin for this beautiful mess of an ideologyú They’re defending a white woman taking a racial status that’s not hers in any way, shape, or form. Oh, and you bet that Warren isn’t apologizing for it. What a time to be alive, but also shows how Democrats continue to fail miserably to police their own. Lie-a-Watha has been exposed at least.

Oh fucking bullshit ThePuke. Your OP is completely full of unmitigated horseshit.

Let's just take the first paragraph, shall we.

Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t.

The fuck she doesn't. It showed up in that report, now didn't it.

She is 1/1024th Native American

Not only did you just contradict yourself but that isn't what that report says.

I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none.

And who the fuck are you?

Doesn't matter -- the same report deliberately did a comparison with control groups of typically non-NA Europeans and found the samples to have over ten times the level of NA genomes as that control group had. So your post is utter BULLSHIT.

All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

Haha, you spelled "blame" wrong, illiterate sheep.

The only 'some kind of fraud' committed was in fact committed by this alleged reporter who's quoted as saying "she committed 'some level of fraud' by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action". Yet it's been known for years that Warren undertook no such quest, and moreover that when the form came up asking if she wanted to apply for that status she specifically checked "No".

Crock o' bullshit.

 

[MarathonMike]

Like I said, Melania Trump has more Injun in her than Warren. Now there's some high cheekbones!

 

[The Purge]

Without doubt, somewhere along the line in the fraudulent misrepresentation of herself, she’d have encountered that pesky ‘under penalty of perjury’ phrase with its accompanying warning re ‘subject to a term of imprisonment of ____ and a fine not to exceed $____’.


Read more
Townhall.com ^

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) released her DNA tests recently, and it showed what we’ve known for years: she’s not really Native American. The allegation has hung around her neck since 2012. Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t. She is 1/1024th Native American. I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none. All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

If this is the new benchmark established by liberals to shield their own from terrible acts of cultural appropriation for personal gain, then I guess we can be whomever the hell we want.

So, what to make of this? Well, NBC reporter Jonathan Allen was on The Bill Press Show yesterday, where he said that at some level, Warren committed an act of fraud (via Free Beacon) [emphasis mine]:


NBC political reporter Jon Allen said Wednesday that Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D., Mass.) DNA test, which she could be between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American, shows she committed "some level of fraud" by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action.

"The people that are most offended by this are people who believe in affirmation action," Allen said during an interview on the "Bill Press Show," "because they're like, ‘Elizabeth Warren didn't need affirmative action.' She perpetrated some level of fraud, and that hurts affirmative action."

"She wanted to get it behind her before the midterms," Allen said when explaining why she did the DNA test and announced the results at all, "so she could have a clean slate to go in."

[…]

Warren released the results of her DNA test on Oct. 15, framing the results as confirmation of her Native American identity. Cherokee Nation issued a statement in response, saying DNA tests have no bearing on tribal affiliation and that her actions were "undermining tribal interests."

[…]

"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong," his statement continued. "It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Elizabeth Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

Now, how has this impacted Warren? Well, about half of the voters polled by Politico have not changed their opinion of her (via Politico):


Roughly half of voters — 49 percent — say Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s decision to release the results of a DNA test indicating she has some Native American ancestry makes no difference in their view of her, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Prompted in part by President Donald Trump’s derisive references to her as “Pocahontas,” the Massachusetts senator made her DNA test results public last week, which indicate there is "strong evidence" she had a Native American in her family dating back 6 to 10 generations ago. Controversy over her ancestry has dogged the Massachusetts Democrat since she ran for Senate against former Republican Sen. Scott Brown in 2012 and the move was widely seen as an effort to help clear the path for a prospective 2020 presidential run.

[…]

Forty percent of voters surveyed nationally said the test’s release shifted their view in some way — 16 percent said it made their impression of Warren more favorable, while 24 percent said they view her less favorably.

Broken down by party, 57 percent of Democrats said Warren's big reveal made "no difference" in their opinion of her. The same was true for 40 percent of Republicans surveyed. Morning Consult polled 1,968 registered voters was conducted online Oct. 18 and Oct. 19, several days after the DNA test news broke. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points.

So, after years of harassing, protesting, and whining about so-called cultural appropriation, the Left is circling the wagons around a white woman who straight up committed the worst sin for this beautiful mess of an ideologyú They’re defending a white woman taking a racial status that’s not hers in any way, shape, or form. Oh, and you bet that Warren isn’t apologizing for it. What a time to be alive, but also shows how Democrats continue to fail miserably to police their own. Lie-a-Watha has been exposed at least.

Oh fucking bullshit ThePuke. Your OP is completely full of unmitigated horseshit.

Let's just take the first paragraph, shall we.

Warren has claimed that she has Cherokee ancestry. She doesn’t.

The fuck she doesn't. It showed up in that report, now didn't it.

She is 1/1024th Native American

Not only did you just contradict yourself but that isn't what that report says.

I have more Native American blood than Warren…and I have none.

And who the fuck are you?

Doesn't matter -- the same report deliberately did a comparison with control groups of typically non-NA Europeans and found the samples to have over ten times the level of NA genomes as that control group had. So your post is utter BULLSHIT.

All credit for that line goes to Donald J. Trump.

Haha, you spelled "blame" wrong, illiterate sheep.

The only 'some kind of fraud' committed was in fact committed by this alleged reporter who's quoted as saying "she committed 'some level of fraud' by claiming Native ancestry in order to benefit from affirmative action". Yet it's been known for years that Warren undertook no such quest, and moreover that when the form came up asking if she wanted to apply for that status she specifically checked "No".

Crock o' bullshit.

She's also related to Pog, IQ under 60!

 

[Care4all]

Then blame her mother, who is the one who passed down her family lore...

no one can be charged with perjury if they do not know they are telling a lie.... that's how the perjury laws work.

Also, she never applied for a job, using affirmative action laws or quotas to obtain any of her jobs, so it seems the op from Townhall is all simply, right wing propaganda, to get you all excited over nothing....???
-------------
(corrected)
the test results showed there was a pure native American as her Great grandparent X 4, to a Great grandparent X 8.... in that time frame range

1/64 to 1/1024, everyone has 64 great times 4 grandparents, everyone has 1024 great times 8 grandparents

From doing my own genealogy, that really is not that long ago... around 1780 birth for my 4th great grandparent on my father's side following his last name, my maiden name... genealogy.... I've traced it back to my 9th great grandfather with my maiden last name on Ancestry....

you have 4 grandparents, they each have 4 grandparents, which comes to 16 great great grandparents of yours, and those 16 great great grandparents each have 4 grandparents which comes to 64 great great great great grandparents of yours....

those 64 great great great great grandparents of yours each have 4 grandparents, comes to 256 great X 6 grandparents of yours, and they each have 4 grandparents which comes to 1024 great X 8 great grandparents of yours....

TRUST ME, this is why no one will ever in the history of mankind, ever be able to manually trace your family genealogy completely... there are just too many relative family lines to trace... it's so disappointing.... I thought for sure after a year of tracing, I'd have it all done....

now I am hoping to be able to trace 1/100th of my family line back a few hundred years... and I;d be happy....

 

[flacaltenn]

The fuck she doesn't. It showed up in that report, now didn't it.

The confidence range of this "trace" amount is 50 times BROADER than than the mean value. It's in the noise. Ancestry.com will tell you that. Nothing there of a reliable nature.

You deny science a lot --- do you?

 

[The Purge]

Then blame her mother, who is the one who passed down her family lore...

no one can be charged with perjury if they do not know they are telling a lie.... that's how the perjury laws work.

Also, she never applied for a job, using affirmative action laws or quotas to obtain any of her jobs, so it seems the op from Townhall is all simply, right wing propaganda, to get you all excited over nothing....???
-------------
(corrected)
the test results showed there was a pure native American as her Great grandparent X 4, to a Great grandparent X 8.... in that time frame range

1/64 to 1/1024, everyone has 64 great times 4 grandparents, everyone has 1024 great times 8 grandparents

From doing my own genealogy, that really is not that long ago... around 1780 birth for my 4th great grandparent on my father's side following his last name, my maiden name... genealogy.... I've traced it back to my 9th great grandfather with my maiden last name on Ancestry....

you have 4 grandparents, they each have 4 grandparents, which comes to 16 great great grandparents of yours, and those 16 great great grandparents each have 4 grandparents which comes to 64 great great great great grandparents of yours....

those 64 great great great great grandparents of yours each have 4 grandparents, comes to 256 great X 6 grandparents of yours, and they each have 4 grandparents which comes to 1024 great X 8 great grandparents of yours....

TRUST ME, this is why no one will ever in the history of mankind, ever be able to manually trace your family genealogy completely... there are just too many relative family lines to trace... it's so disappointing.... I thought for sure after a year of tracing, I'd have it all done....

now I am hoping to be able to trace 1/100th of my family line back a few hundred years... and I;d be happy....

Her mother also gave her ALL THOSE INDIAN RECIPES that she had published!!!

Amazon.com: Pow Wow Chow: A Collection of Recipes from Families of the Five Civilized ...
Amazon.com › Pow-Wow-Chow-Collecti...

Story time just got better with Prime Book Box, a subscription that delivers .... Elizabeth Warren apparently plagiarized three of the recipes, two from the NY Times, ... Unfortunately, Warren is a fake Native American.

 

[Nia88]

I find it hilarious that the right is acting so appalled by lying.

 

[The Purge]

I find it hilarious that the right is acting so appalled by lying.

We find it hilarious that you have to lie to make yourself feel better!....You HATERS MUST HATE!

 

[Nia88]

I find it hilarious that the right is acting so appalled by lying.

We find it hilarious that you have to lie to make yourself feel better!....You HATERS MUST HATE!

Lol. That's all you people care about. That Trump is president. Fuck everything else, huh?

 

[The Purge]

I find it hilarious that the right is acting so appalled by lying.

We find it hilarious that you have to lie to make yourself feel better!....You HATERS MUST HATE!

Lol. That's all you people care about. That Trump is president. Fuck everything else, huh?

Hey Nia, you can always DONATE your tax cut to the VA....Give it to someone that can REALLY USE IT!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And remember, Warren tried to pass herself off as a minority. She declared it on at least one printed publication.

 

[Care4all]

And remember, Warren tried to pass herself off as a minority. She declared it on at least one printed publication.

she did not try to pass herself off as a minority for affirmative action reasons. That's the LIE republicans have made up

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And remember, Warren tried to pass herself off as a minority. She declared it on at least one printed publication.

she did not try to pass herself off as a minority for affirmative action reasons. That's the LIE republicans have made up

Directories identified Warren as minority
Listing preceded tenure at Harvard

US Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren - who said Friday she didn’t realize Harvard Law School had been promoting her as a Native American faculty member in the 1990s - was listed as a minority professor in American law school directories for nine years before she landed at Harvard, documents show.


The Association of American Law Schools desk book, a directory of law professors from participating schools, includes Warren among the minority law professors listed, beginning in 1986 and continuing through 1995. The years include time she spent teaching at the University of Texas and the University of Pennsylvania, before she joined the faculty at Harvard Law.

The listings were based on professors reporting that they were members of a minority group, the directory says.


Elizabeth Warren was listed as a minority professor in law directories in the ‘80s and ‘90s

 

[Care4all]

Donald Trump has told over 5000 lies since he has taken office.

He and his father tried to pass themselves off as Scottish instead of Germans because we were fighting the Nazi's and real estate sales by Germans were not welcomed here.... so for money, they lied about their heritage.


Donald Trump committed FRAUD on his income taxes and is under investigation by the state of New York as we speak.

Donald Trump has been money laundering for the Russians, by selling them thousands of his properties. One tower in Miami that he owns is specifically for young pregnant Russian women to come here and live in the latter part of their pregnancies so to deliver and birth their children here on US Soil so they can have duel citizenship, and have American citizenship....

Donal Trump created a BOGUS University Trump University, to commit fraud and rip old people and poorer people off.....

Donald Trump is CROOKED DONALD, down to his very inner core...crooked crooked crookedm a FRAUD

Yest you all are picking on a woman who thought through Family lore given to her by her mother, she had a Native American Great grand mother....

She was proud of that heritage that she was told she had.

She NEVER EVER tried to use her heritage, in order to get an affirmative action given job.

Believe it or not, she is actually very smart and achieved her career, without being a fraud, like Donald Trump has been, his entire life.

Now go home, and shut up.

 

[Care4all]

And remember, Warren tried to pass herself off as a minority. She declared it on at least one printed publication.

she did not try to pass herself off as a minority for affirmative action reasons. That's the LIE republicans have made up

Directories identified Warren as minority
Listing preceded tenure at Harvard

US Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren - who said Friday she didn’t realize Harvard Law School had been promoting her as a Native American faculty member in the 1990s - was listed as a minority professor in American law school directories for nine years before she landed at Harvard, documents show.


The Association of American Law Schools desk book, a directory of law professors from participating schools, includes Warren among the minority law professors listed, beginning in 1986 and continuing through 1995. The years include time she spent teaching at the University of Texas and the University of Pennsylvania, before she joined the faculty at Harvard Law.

The listings were based on professors reporting that they were members of a minority group, the directory says.


Elizabeth Warren was listed as a minority professor in law directories in the ‘80s and ‘90s

you need to do a fact check, an extensive investigation was done and it showed she did not use the status in the directory to get a job...