NBC removes documentation that atmospheric temperature data showing no warming in 2005 was fudged

How does it grow dufus ?


It grows every year, which is why we can extract ICE CORE DATA from it...



cores extracted from the Greenland Ice Sheet preserve 130,000 years of climate history. Cores from the Antarctic Ice Sheet preserve up to 800,000 years.
 
It grows every year, which is why we can extract ICE CORE DATA from it...



cores extracted from the Greenland Ice Sheet preserve 130,000 years of climate history. Cores from the Antarctic Ice Sheet preserve up to 800,000 years.
You didn’t answer the question bubba. How does it grow bubba. Are you struggling with the spoken word
 
It grows every year, which is why we can extract ICE CORE DATA from it...



cores extracted from the Greenland Ice Sheet preserve 130,000 years of climate history. Cores from the Antarctic Ice Sheet preserve up to 800,000 years.
So you’re reference is NSIDC.
So here is what NSIDC says about climate change.

So bubba, you’re a fraud. You pick and choose what you want to believe.
 
You didn’t answer the question bubba. How does it grow bubba. Are you struggling with the spoken word


Each year, it adds another layer of snow and frost, which stacks on top of last year's...

Do that for 1 million years = Greenland

40 million years = Antarctica
 
So here is what NSIDC says about climate change


which is based on the LIE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming. The ACTUAL DATA refuted that LIE...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling
 
which is based on the LIE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming. The ACTUAL DATA refuted that LIE...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling
Oh, NSIDC….you think they lie except when you think they are right and want to use them as a reference. You sound stupid.
 
which is based on the LIE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming. The ACTUAL DATA refuted that LIE...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling
Wrong. You can’t even read your own reference correctly.
 
Each year, it adds another layer of snow and frost, which stacks on top of last year's...

Do that for 1 million years = Greenland

40 million years = Antarctica
Finally dufus. You admit that SNOW ice makes the vast majority of melting ice, is fresh water and raises sea levels . Sea ice when melting does not. The is no climate research institute in the world that agrees with you. You’re stupid to pretend otherwise.
 
Oh, NSIDC….you think they lie except when you think they are right and want to use them as a reference. You sound stupid.


At least I understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, because you clearly do not.
 
You understand shit. You’re a non reader.
At least I understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, because you clearly do not.
So, you’re dumb enough to think you can use the same reference only for items you agree with. Otherwise if they don’t agree with you, they are wrong. What a fool you are. .
 
At least I understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, because you clearly do not.
You sound like a neophyte, an 8 year old. You can read an entire article and retain anything can you ?
 
You sound like a neophyte, an 8 year old. You can read an entire article and retain anything can you ?


The data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2

The FUDGE is pathetic and easily discredited. "Orbit wobble" wouldn't change the IR satellite readings at all. Constant "shade issues" on the balloons would be, if real, a one time correction for all data, which would keep a flat line a flat line, not convert a flat line into an upward slope, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice that...
 
The data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2

The FUDGE is pathetic and easily discredited. "Orbit wobble" wouldn't change the IR satellite readings at all. Constant "shade issues" on the balloons would be, if real, a one time correction for all data, which would keep a flat line a flat line, not convert a flat line into an upward slope, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice that...
Babble.
 
The data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2

The FUDGE is pathetic and easily discredited. "Orbit wobble" wouldn't change the IR satellite readings at all. Constant "shade issues" on the balloons would be, if real, a one time correction for all data, which would keep a flat line a flat line, not convert a flat line into an upward slope, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice that...
Why do you keep showing your ignorance of global warming. Temperatures are measured at the surface, not in the atmosphere. Dah bubba. Of course atmospheric temps are poor indicators of global warming. Most IR doesn’t get converted to heat till it reaches the surface. What a science illiterate. Of course, you’ve been told this over and over and you still post illiterate babble.
 
Temperatures are measured at the surface, not in the atmosphere


Funny, I thought Co2 was in the atmosphere....

No matter, the atmosphere is not warming, and non urban land areas are also not warming, so whatever you claim Co2 actually does

IT AIN'T WARMING JACK SHIT!!!
 
Funny, I thought Co2 was in the atmosphere....

No matter, the atmosphere is not warming, and non urban land areas are also not warming, so whatever you claim Co2 actually does

IT AIN'T WARMING JACK SHIT!!!
Ha ha. “ no matter”…You’re hilariously ignorant. No wonder your ideas are so wacky. So now you’re reduced to babble with no science, just babbling denial.
 
Funny, I thought Co2 was in the atmosphere....
Ha ha…
CO2 doesn’t warm the atmosphere foolish, it re emits IR which warms the surface. Tell us again how smart you are….I’ve never seen so much science illiteracy in one dumbass Humper.
 
Back
Top Bottom