Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
How does it grow dufus ?What covers Greenland and Antarctica, and has been growing straight through the Co2 FRAUD...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does it grow dufus ?What covers Greenland and Antarctica, and has been growing straight through the Co2 FRAUD...
How does it grow dufus ?
You didn’t answer the question bubba. How does it grow bubba. Are you struggling with the spoken wordIt grows every year, which is why we can extract ICE CORE DATA from it...
![]()
What do ice cores reveal about the past?
By preserving evidence of ancient temperatures and greenhouse gases, ice cores show scientists how much our planet has changed.nsidc.org
cores extracted from the Greenland Ice Sheet preserve 130,000 years of climate history. Cores from the Antarctic Ice Sheet preserve up to 800,000 years.
So you’re reference is NSIDC.It grows every year, which is why we can extract ICE CORE DATA from it...
![]()
What do ice cores reveal about the past?
By preserving evidence of ancient temperatures and greenhouse gases, ice cores show scientists how much our planet has changed.nsidc.org
cores extracted from the Greenland Ice Sheet preserve 130,000 years of climate history. Cores from the Antarctic Ice Sheet preserve up to 800,000 years.
You didn’t answer the question bubba. How does it grow bubba. Are you struggling with the spoken word
So here is what NSIDC says about climate change
Oh, NSIDC….you think they lie except when you think they are right and want to use them as a reference. You sound stupid.which is based on the LIE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming. The ACTUAL DATA refuted that LIE...
![]()
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.www.nbcnews.com
satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling
Wrong. You can’t even read your own reference correctly.which is based on the LIE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming. The ACTUAL DATA refuted that LIE...
![]()
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.www.nbcnews.com
satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling
Finally dufus. You admit that SNOW ice makes the vast majority of melting ice, is fresh water and raises sea levels . Sea ice when melting does not. The is no climate research institute in the world that agrees with you. You’re stupid to pretend otherwise.Each year, it adds another layer of snow and frost, which stacks on top of last year's...
Do that for 1 million years = Greenland
40 million years = Antarctica
You understand shit. You’re a non reader.At least I understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, because you clearly do not.
You understand shit. You’re a non reader.
So, you’re dumb enough to think you can use the same reference only for items you agree with. Otherwise if they don’t agree with you, they are wrong. What a fool you are. .At least I understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, because you clearly do not.
You sound like a neophyte, an 8 year old. You can read an entire article and retain anything can you ?At least I understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, because you clearly do not.
You sound like a neophyte, an 8 year old. You can read an entire article and retain anything can you ?
Babble.The data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2
The FUDGE is pathetic and easily discredited. "Orbit wobble" wouldn't change the IR satellite readings at all. Constant "shade issues" on the balloons would be, if real, a one time correction for all data, which would keep a flat line a flat line, not convert a flat line into an upward slope, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice that...
Why do you keep showing your ignorance of global warming. Temperatures are measured at the surface, not in the atmosphere. Dah bubba. Of course atmospheric temps are poor indicators of global warming. Most IR doesn’t get converted to heat till it reaches the surface. What a science illiterate. Of course, you’ve been told this over and over and you still post illiterate babble.The data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2
The FUDGE is pathetic and easily discredited. "Orbit wobble" wouldn't change the IR satellite readings at all. Constant "shade issues" on the balloons would be, if real, a one time correction for all data, which would keep a flat line a flat line, not convert a flat line into an upward slope, but it takes an IQ over 5 to notice that...
Temperatures are measured at the surface, not in the atmosphere
Ha ha. “ no matter”…You’re hilariously ignorant. No wonder your ideas are so wacky. So now you’re reduced to babble with no science, just babbling denial.Funny, I thought Co2 was in the atmosphere....
No matter, the atmosphere is not warming, and non urban land areas are also not warming, so whatever you claim Co2 actually does
IT AIN'T WARMING JACK SHIT!!!
Ha ha…Funny, I thought Co2 was in the atmosphere....