Native American Council Offers Amnesty to 240 Million Undocumented Whites

They must have been drunk. A stone age culture was conquered by a technologically superior civilization. There was no nation so it's impossible to be here illegally. Europeans did what many indians and others did all through man's history, they killed people and took their shit. You want to cry in your whiskey go ahead but it doesn't change anything.

They should have spent their time productively instead of bellyaching about things they didn't experience, had no part of and can do nothing about.
Do you then support Israel's claim to Israel since they conquered the Palestinians?
Sure, and they weren't Palestinians. No country of Palestine has existed and most there now moved from Jordan. Do you support Texas staying part of the US?

Just cheking logical consistency.

Having lived in Texas about a year I think breaking away would harm them more than it'd help. State's too big to do well absent federal funds and such.
 
They must have been drunk. A stone age culture was conquered by a technologically superior civilization. There was no nation so it's impossible to be here illegally. Europeans did what many indians and others did all through man's history, they killed people and took their shit. You want to cry in your whiskey go ahead but it doesn't change anything.

They should have spent their time productively instead of bellyaching about things they didn't experience, had no part of and can do nothing about.
Do you then support Israel's claim to Israel since they conquered the Palestinians?
Sure, and they weren't Palestinians. No country of Palestine has existed and most there now moved from Jordan. Do you support Texas staying part of the US?
bahahaha! Texas would last about five min as an independent nation....
 
"New discoveries at a Central Texas archaeological site by a Texas A&M University-led research team prove that people lived in the region far earlier – as much as 2,500 years earlier – than previously believed, rewriting what anthropologists know about when the first inhabitants arrived in North America. That pushes the arrival date back to about 15,500 years ago.
...
For more than 80 years, it has been argued that the Clovis people were the first to enter the Americas, Waters says. He goes on to say that over the last few decades, there have been several credible sites which date older than Clovis found in North America -- specifically in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Oregon.

"However, this evidence is not very robust," Waters observes.

"What is special about the Debra L. Friedkin site is that it has the largest number of artifacts dating to the pre-Clovis time period, that these artifacts show an array of different technologies, and that these artifacts date to a very early time.

"This discovery challenges us to re-think the early colonization of the Americas. There's no doubt these tools and weapons are human-made and they date to about 15,500 years ago, making them the oldest artifacts found both in Texas and North America.""
Paleo-Indians settled North America earlier than thought study
Clovis was debunked a while back along with the Soultrean hypothesis. The NA's are descended from East Asians. Technically Black aborigines were probably the first inhabitants.
 
"New discoveries at a Central Texas archaeological site by a Texas A&M University-led research team prove that people lived in the region far earlier – as much as 2,500 years earlier – than previously believed, rewriting what anthropologists know about when the first inhabitants arrived in North America. That pushes the arrival date back to about 15,500 years ago.
...
For more than 80 years, it has been argued that the Clovis people were the first to enter the Americas, Waters says. He goes on to say that over the last few decades, there have been several credible sites which date older than Clovis found in North America -- specifically in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Oregon.

"However, this evidence is not very robust," Waters observes.

"What is special about the Debra L. Friedkin site is that it has the largest number of artifacts dating to the pre-Clovis time period, that these artifacts show an array of different technologies, and that these artifacts date to a very early time.

"This discovery challenges us to re-think the early colonization of the Americas. There's no doubt these tools and weapons are human-made and they date to about 15,500 years ago, making them the oldest artifacts found both in Texas and North America.""
Paleo-Indians settled North America earlier than thought study
Clovis was debunked a while back along with the Soultrean hypothesis. The NA's are descended from East Asians. Technically Black aborigines were probably the first inhabitants.
Who Were The First Americans?
Stefan Lovgren
for National Geographic News
September 3, 2003
A study of skulls excavated from the tip of Baja California in Mexico suggests that the first Americans may not have been the ancestors of today's Amerindians, but another people who came from Southeast Asia and the southern Pacific area.
The question of who colonized the Americas, and when, has long been hotly debated. Traditionally, Native Americans are believed to have descended from northeast Asia, arriving over a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska some 12,000 years ago and then migrating across North and South America.


But recent research, including the Baja California study, indicates that the initial settlement of the continent was instead driven by Southeast Asians who occupied Australia 60,000 years ago and then expanded into the Americas about 13,500 years ago, prior to Mongoloid people arriving from northeast Asia.
The skulls from Baja California, which may date back only a few hundred years, have slender-looking faces that are different from the broad-cheeked craniums of modern Amerindians, the descendants of the Mongoloid people.
"Our results change the traditional idea that all modern Amerindians present morphological affinities with East Asians as a result of a single migration," said Rolando González-José of the University of Barcelona, Spain, who led the study. "The settlement of the New World is better explained by considering a continuous influx of people from Asia."
The new study is reported in this week's issue of the science journal Nature, and could further fuel the controversy surrounding the origins of the first Americans, which is a controversial issue for American Indians in particular.
Challenging Clovis
Conventional wisdom says that Native Americans descended from prehistoric hunters who walked from northeast Asia across a land bridge, formed at the end of the Ice Age, to Alaska some 12,000 years ago. American Indians resemble the people of Mongolia, China and Siberia.
In the 1930s, archeologists found stone spear points among the bones of mammoths near Clovis, New Mexico. Radio carbon dating in the 1950s showed that the oldest site was 11,400 years old. The sites were assumed, for years, to be the first evidence of human occupation in the Americas.
But more recent discoveries challenge the Clovis story. In 1996, archeologists in southern Chile found weapons and tools dating back 12,500 years. In Brazil, they found some of the oldest human remains in the Americas, among them a skeleton—named Luzia—that is more than 11,000 years old.
Luzia did not look like American Indians. Instead, her facial features matched most closely with the native Aborigines in Australia. These people date back to about 60,000 years and were themselves descended from the first humans who probably originated in Africa.
Who Were The First Americans
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
 
for the people who are always looking to be pissed off....Note: This article was written in a satire format. It offers a different look at history from a different view-point than most would think of. What is the reason for this article? To prove that just because it’s on the internet or published does not make it true. When you do a Google search via the title you will get 47,000 hits. Just goes to show you how far a hoax can be perpetuated and people will still believe it.
 
Last edited:
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
the same laws that would cause you to fight any invasion.
damn! you are stupid..
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
SMH White privilege. Who told you that you get to dictate the rules of how immigration laws work according to NA's? These arent your customs and laws. Your customs and laws dont matter.
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

I am "truly" Irish and I know exactly how the Irish were treated. With that said...there are no "native" Americans, everybody immigrated here
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

I am "truly" Irish and I know exactly how the Irish were treated. With that said...there are no "native" Americans, everybody immigrated here
false!
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

I am "truly" Irish and I know exactly how the Irish were treated. With that said...there are no "native" Americans, everybody immigrated here
false!

BS, everyone came here from somewhere
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
the same laws that would cause you to fight any invasion.
damn! you are stupid..

You are talking about undocumented immigration, which can't happen when documents are not even in existence.

If you are talking about conquest, then all parties were involved in that, European vs Natives, Natives vs. Natives, and Europeans vs. Europeans.

Even in Satire the OP pieces has no grounding in reality.
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

I am "truly" Irish and I know exactly how the Irish were treated. With that said...there are no "native" Americans, everybody immigrated here
false!

BS, everyone came here from somewhere
Some people were here before the US was founded.
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
SMH White privilege. Who told you that you get to dictate the rules of how immigration laws work according to NA's? These arent your customs and laws. Your customs and laws dont matter.

If you are claiming that the original European settlers were undocumented in a western sense, then you have to apply western rules to what is considered undocumented. If you can't, the comparison fails on its lack of merits.
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
the same laws that would cause you to fight any invasion.
damn! you are stupid..

You are talking about undocumented immigration, which can't happen when documents are not even in existence.

If you are talking about conquest, then all parties were involved in that, European vs Natives, Natives vs. Natives, and Europeans vs. Europeans.

Even in Satire the OP pieces has no grounding in reality.
Yes it can. Who told you undocumented immigration needed a document to be in existence? This is not "white guy rules". This is NA rules.
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

What established immigration laws were broken by the European Settlers?
Where are the written records of said laws?
During said action, what legal actions did the existing government at the time take?
SMH White privilege. Who told you that you get to dictate the rules of how immigration laws work according to NA's? These arent your customs and laws. Your customs and laws dont matter.

If you are claiming that the original European settlers were undocumented in a western sense, then you have to apply western rules to what is considered undocumented. If you can't, the comparison fails on its lack of merits.
No you dont. Who died and made you the person that determines what we have to apply?
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

I am "truly" Irish and I know exactly how the Irish were treated. With that said...there are no "native" Americans, everybody immigrated here
false!

BS, everyone came here from somewhere
yes, but not in the way you mean it...
the people of north and south America were here thousands of years before any Europeans making your claim silly and irrelevant
 
the expected dumb ass retort arrives .
if you were truly Irish you'd know that they were treated almost as bad as native Americans..
but being a jingoist
jingoism

noun jin·go·ism \ˈjiŋ-(ˌ)gō-ˌi-zəm\
: the feelings and beliefs of people who think that their country is always right and who are in favor of aggressive acts against other countries.
you are clueless.

I am "truly" Irish and I know exactly how the Irish were treated. With that said...there are no "native" Americans, everybody immigrated here
false!

BS, everyone came here from somewhere
yes, but not in the way you mean it...
the people of north and south America were here thousands of years before any Europeans making your claim silly and irrelevant

But factual, besides I didn't immigrate here, I was born here, I don't need their "faux" amnesty AHAHAHA
 

Forum List

Back
Top