National Security Threat: PRESIDENT Biden MOCKS 'Freedom' During Attack On 1st Responders For Un-Constitutional Mandate Non-Compliance

[meaner gene]

It raised taxes on the wealthy in all 50 states something Dems claim to want.

Actually it raised taxes on the middle class in the blue states.

 

[BluesLegend]

The difference is the impact on each state. And the SALT cap was deliberately targeted at the blue states.

Go ahead argue against this tax INCREASE on the wealthy LMAO. OMG after decades of Dems demanding the wealthy pay more Dems squeal like stuck pigs when Trump actually makes them pay more

 

[BluesLegend]

Actually it raised taxes on the middle class in the blue states.

WRONG stop lying. I did the math on a family of 4 in California applying ALL the tax reform bill benefits. A family of 4 in California paid not one cent more (or less) until they hit about $280,000 in income.

 

[meaner gene]

Go ahead argue against this tax INCREASE on the wealthy LMAO.

The SALT tax was like the nets they used to catch tuna. Only like with tuna nets, they caught dolphins (aka the middle class) with the amount deliberately chosen to impact the blue states.

State-Local Tax Burden Rankings | Tax Foundation

What are tax burdens? Explore the latest state-local tax burden rankings with a new Tax Foundation study on state and local taxes.

taxfoundation.org

It was deliberately set just above the red state tax burden.

 

[22lcidw]

Trump targeted the "blue" states, both with his SALT tax cap, and how he handled the COVID pandemic.

Meanwhile Bidens build back better, is a 50 state bill, based on NEED, not on politics.

You talk about revenue sharing which goes mostly to blue areas located in red states but not about the revenue sharing that taxpayers in higher tax states receive with their tax breaks.

 

[BluesLegend]

The SALT tax was like the nets they used to catch tuna. Only like with tuna nets, they caught dolphins (aka the middle class) with the amount deliberately chosen to impact the blue states.

State-Local Tax Burden Rankings | Tax Foundation

What are tax burdens? Explore the latest state-local tax burden rankings with a new Tax Foundation study on state and local taxes.

taxfoundation.org

It was deliberately set just above the red state tax burden.

You keep repeating the same lie, the SALT cap did not increase taxes on the middle class, you LIE. Now if there were more wealthy people in red states are you claiming that you would still be here arguing against the SALT cap? I'll give you the answer, it's no.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The constitution is silent on border security. In fact, when it was written, they were importing anybody and anything without restraint.

Well, I'm sure we could debate what A4S4 means by "invasion", but it boils down to us being a sovereign nation and if we have no border protection, then we have no nation. Invasion? By enemy military? By enemy governments? By anyone who is in the country illegally?

We could split hairs on this, but I don't want to get away from the point of my post, that we have delegated powers to the government for a reason, that reason being, when you start getting outside of the mandate, you end up with what we have now, nobody being able to agree on what they should and should not be doing.

Get rid of all the extra and just stick to what the founders laid out. Leave the rest to the states....as directed by the constitution.

 

[meaner gene]

You talk about revenue sharing which goes mostly to blue areas located in red states but not about the revenue sharing that taxpayers in higher tax states receive with their tax breaks.

Myth BUSTED

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

And is that even the correct way to frame the question?

www.theatlantic.com

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low.

Just look at the federal poverty level map, the darker the poorer.

 

[meaner gene]

You keep repeating the same lie, the SALT cap did not increase taxes on the middle class, you LIE.

My tax guy explained that since the SALT cap, I could no longer itemize, and I went from getting thousands in federal refunds, to paying thousands in additional federal tax.

So don't t ell me the middle class didn't get a tax increase because of SALT limits.

 

[BluesLegend]

My tax guy explained that since the SALT cap, I could no longer itemize, and I went from getting thousands in federal refunds, to paying thousands in additional federal tax.

So don't t ell me the middle class didn't get a tax increase because of SALT limits.

Nice, glad to hear it. Pay your fair share of the Federal taxes.

 

[meaner gene]

Well, I'm sure we could debate what A4S4 means by "invasion", but it boils down to us being a sovereign nation and if we have no border protection, then we have no nation. Invasion? By enemy military? By enemy governments? By anyone who is in the country illegally?

You are talking about "inherent" powers not enumerated in the constitution.

And your point was that if it wasn't enumerated in the constitution, then congress has no power to do it.

Your own example proves you wrong.

 

[meaner gene]

Nice, glad to hear it. Pay your fair share of the Federal taxes.

For almost a decade I paid more federal income tax than Donald J. Trump did.

 

[justinacolmena]

responders SHOULD be fired for not getting the vaccine

First responders aren't doctors. They can take patients with flashing lights and sirens to a vaccination center to be vaccinated by doctors under orders of a court-martial — but if they are aren't willing to submit to government-mandated vaccinations themselves, then why are they showing up to work where their job is to transport patients to emergency vaccination centers to be vaccinated against their will?

If the vaccine is any good, show a little faith and put a little of your own own skin in the game by submitting to the vaccination yourselves before you go to work to force it on other people against their will and run up bills on their insurance and against their credit to pay your own union wages and bennies.

 

[B. Kidd]

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


This is the Oath of Office every President takes when they are sworn in. President Biden took this oath. He swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He swore to protect the Constitutional Rights, the freedom the Constitution provides every American citizen. He lied.

President and Democrats prefer an Oligarchy, a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people, specifically DEMOCRATS.

President Biden recently made this perfectly clear, that he does not care what Rights and freedom the Constitution affords American citizens when those freedoms conflict with Marxist/Socialist ideology and get in the way of their agenda:

Biden says cops and other first responders SHOULD be fired for not getting the vaccine and mocks people who use 'freedom' as a defense for refusing a shot during CNN town hall​

President Biden unleashed his anger at people refusing vaccination on Thursday. During a CNN town hall, he said it was right that emergency responders were fired if they would not get vaccinated against COVID-19.

President Biden's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate is Un-Constitutional, as in 'ILLEGAL'; however, as THE top authoritarian in the Democrat Party's Oligarchy, Biden does not care and demands compliance.

Biden put this on full display at the CNN Town Hall where he OPENLY MOCKED Americans who are defying his illegal, Un-Constitutional mandate.


'Mandates are working.'
- President Biden

1. Again, Vaccine Mandates are ILLEGAL and UN-CONSTITUTIONAL

2. The Mandates are not working to get people vaccinated. The extortion and punishment for not complying with Biden's illegal mandate is working...with SOME Americans. Others, not so much.


Biden wants unilateral compliance with his Un-Constitutional, illegal vaccine mandate.
- He doesn't want to hear anyone cite their Constitutional right NOT to get the vaccines.
- He doesn't want to hear, 'My Body, MY Choice' unless it deals with abortions.
- He doesn't want to follow the science and hear about Natural Immunity.
- He doesn't want to hear how being vaccinated is a decision to be madeby a person and their doctor


View attachment 554948

Biden mocks people who use 'freedom' as a cover for refusing a shot

Biden defended vaccine mandates during a CNN town hall on Thursday and ridiculed people who complained their freedom was being infringed.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Bi-Dung was installed.
Of course he mocks FREEDOM!

He only cherishes his 10%!!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


This is the Oath of Office every President takes when they are sworn in. President Biden took this oath. He swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. He swore to protect the Constitutional Rights, the freedom the Constitution provides every American citizen. He lied.

President and Democrats prefer an Oligarchy, a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people, specifically DEMOCRATS.

President Biden recently made this perfectly clear, that he does not care what Rights and freedom the Constitution affords American citizens when those freedoms conflict with Marxist/Socialist ideology and get in the way of their agenda:

Biden says cops and other first responders SHOULD be fired for not getting the vaccine and mocks people who use 'freedom' as a defense for refusing a shot during CNN town hall​

President Biden unleashed his anger at people refusing vaccination on Thursday. During a CNN town hall, he said it was right that emergency responders were fired if they would not get vaccinated against COVID-19.

President Biden's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate is Un-Constitutional, as in 'ILLEGAL'; however, as THE top authoritarian in the Democrat Party's Oligarchy, Biden does not care and demands compliance.

Biden put this on full display at the CNN Town Hall where he OPENLY MOCKED Americans who are defying his illegal, Un-Constitutional mandate.


'Mandates are working.'
- President Biden

1. Again, Vaccine Mandates are ILLEGAL and UN-CONSTITUTIONAL

2. The Mandates are not working to get people vaccinated. The extortion and punishment for not complying with Biden's illegal mandate is working...with SOME Americans. Others, not so much.


Biden wants unilateral compliance with his Un-Constitutional, illegal vaccine mandate.
- He doesn't want to hear anyone cite their Constitutional right NOT to get the vaccines.
- He doesn't want to hear, 'My Body, MY Choice' unless it deals with abortions.
- He doesn't want to follow the science and hear about Natural Immunity.
- He doesn't want to hear how being vaccinated is a decision to be madeby a person and their doctor


View attachment 554948

Biden mocks people who use 'freedom' as a cover for refusing a shot

Biden defended vaccine mandates during a CNN town hall on Thursday and ridiculed people who complained their freedom was being infringed.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Biden himself said the government couldn't force people to take the vaccine and Nan Pelosi said the same
thing, speaking of freedom.

And Brandon Biden and Kamala both said they would not take a vaccine that Trump produced claiming
their freedom to refuse.

But Joe lies a lot and always has...https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/05/that-time-joe-biden-lied-about-his-academic-credentials/
...so we shouldn't accept anything President Magoo says at face value.

(mic drop)

 

[ThisIsMe]

You are talking about "inherent" powers not enumerated in the constitution.

And your point was that if it wasn't enumerated in the constitution, then congress has no power to do it.

Your own example proves you wrong.

•

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

#15.

We are to raise an army and a navy. What is the purpose of a standing army? To defend our nation. As I said, you can debate all you want about the meaning of "invasion" and I'm sure you'll get many different opinions.

Again, please see the point of my post. Even if border security were not part of the delegated powers of the federal government, it wouldn't change my stance. I'd say then it needs to be on the states, as directed, but it is a delegated power as part of the 18.

Again, my point is, the federal government should have never been able to get as big as it has, because by allowing it, it has become the basis of all the bickering we see today. Everyone wants the government to be what THEY want it to be, rather than what it's supposed to be.

 

[meaner gene]

Again, please see the point of my post. Even if border security were not part of the delegated powers of the federal government, it wouldn't change my stance. I'd say then it needs to be on the states, as directed, but it is a delegated power as part of the 18.

Clearly the states can't be relied upon to repel an invasion, no more than Belgium could be relied upon to stop the German invasion of France.

So again your idea of delegating it to the states goes against the inherent powers dictated by common sense. In short, like the inalienable rights, they were so obvious, they didn't need to be written down.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Clearly the states can't be relied upon to repel an invasion, no more than Belgium could be relied upon to stop the German invasion of France.

So again your idea of delegating it to the states goes against the inherent powers dictated by common sense. In short, like the inalienable rights, they were so obvious, they didn't need to be written down.

It Is clear though that there are limits on government actions. You're trying to get into the "assumed powers" of the government as a way of saying "well, there are no delegated powers, so, if it's open to interpretation, then why shouldn't it be able to do all if this other stuff", and my answer is still the same. It leads to dissention because nobody can agree what "other stuff" is acceptable, and it being left to interpretation usually ends up with whoever is in control interpreting things for their own benefit.

I think border protection is addressed in the invasion clause.

There there is the 10th ammendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

We can disagree, but my opinion is that the federal government is not and should not be viewed as having unlimited power and broad scope. If the 18 delegated powers were not the founders intent, then they would have never written them, and then backed it up with the 10th ammendment.

 

[meaner gene]

We can disagree, but my opinion is that the federal government is not and should not be viewed as having unlimited power and broad scope. If the 18 delegated powers were not the founders intent, then they would have never written them, and then backed it up with the 10th ammendment.

Inherit powers include those needed to carry out the enumerated powers. Such as you can't make laws without being able to compel people to give you the information you need to write them. And with the power of the purse, comes the responsibility to oversee that spending.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Inherit powers include those needed to carry out the enumerated powers. Such as you can't make laws without being able to compel people to give you the information you need to write them. And with the power of the purse, comes the responsibility to oversee that spending.

Give me an example of the inherent powers? The 18 powers delegated are pretty cut and dry, and the founders were pretty clear, if the power is not listed here then it goes to the states and the people.

I get the impression that you think the intent of the founders was that the government would have the power to do anything it wanted and take on whatever duty it wanted, even if part of the population was against it. Again, I have to disagree. That is a losing scenario that leads us to where we are at today, chaos.