National Implications: A Larry Elder Victory in California Would Shift U.S. Senate Majority to Republicans

[justoffal]

Do any of you actually trust California to hold a fair election?

Pie in the sky dreaming

No....not at all

 

[justoffal]

Its not the same

gingsberg operated in the shadows as far as the public was concerned

We had only rumors to tell us whats going on

and gingsberg could vote from her hospital bed if she wanted to

but feinsteine has to physically show up to vote on legislation

if she doesnt its almost as bad as a resignation

if she cant make it or is in a clear vegetative state the public will notice

The Senate does have options in that event.

 

[Mac-7]

The Senate does have options in that event.

What options?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hardly, nobody was threatening to undo her entire legacy. Scandal is one thing, going out poorly is what would be remembered, and those scandals will all come back to boot. The only reason she is still there is her stubbornness and Democrats can't afford to lose a seat or even have one vacant. If Newsome is recalled expect every effort to be made to have her removed, and rightfully so.

Why would Democrats want her removed and replaced by a Republican? You are not making any sense.

Newsome gets recalled and Larry Elder gets elected. The Democrats will not even bother putting pressure on her to resign, as she would be replaced by a Republican. You do realize the recall election is in 9 days! Right? It appears she is going nowhere.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

A good placement of a Win 300, could get her to retire real quick. Just like what happened when LBJ wanted JFK to retire...

I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[justoffal]

What options?

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Assassination

 

[Mac-7]

Assassination

You are posting very recklessly

Having a senile old communist bitch in the senate is bad

but murder is not the solution

 

[Seawytch]

Do any of you actually trust California to hold a fair election?

Pie in the sky dreaming

I do. Just like they do every election. There is no more proof of widespread voter fraud in California than in any other state in the union. In fact, California puts more safeguards in place than many red States.

California requires that voting systems be tested and certified by the state, that logic and accuracy testing occur prior to every election, that voting machines have a paper trail for voter verification and auditing AND they require a post election manual audit after EVERY election. Does your state do any of those things?

 

[Rogue AI]

Why would Democrats want her removed and replaced by a Republican? You are not making any sense.

Newsome gets recalled and Larry Elder gets elected. The Democrats will not even bother putting pressure on her to resign, as she would be replaced by a Republican. You do realize the recall election is in 9 days! Right? It appears she is going nowhere.

That's what this about, how Elder would pressure her to resign, or pressure the Senate itself to do something. Even Democrats can't ignore the clear ethical problem of allowing someone incapable of the job to remain in office. Of course Democrats don't want her gone, but there is very little chance she'll last out her term. On the other hand, she could have resigned and been replaced before the recall, preserving the seat until a special election. That didn't happen, so that seat might fall to a Republican. It's the Ginsberg problem just waiting to happen.

 

[justoffal]

You are posting very recklessly

Having a senile old communist bitch in the senate is bad

but murder is not the solution

It's not my suggestion....I was merely clarifying a point via query to the Admiral about another poster's comment.....he asked what was meant...I clarified....doesn't matter I'm pretty sure he's got me on ignore anyway.

 

[justoffal]

I do. Just like they do every election. There is no more proof of widespread voter fraud in California than in any other state in the union. In fact, California puts more safeguards in place than many red States.

California requires that voting systems be tested and certified by the state, that logic and accuracy testing occur prior to every election, that voting machines have a paper trail for voter verification and auditing AND they require a post election manual audit after EVERY election. Does your state do any of those things?

None of that matters. Btw the evidence of voter fraud is massive. What are you talking about? All of your safeguards are still subject to the Josef-rule. He who does the counting.

 

[AZrailwhale]

That's what this about, how Elder would pressure her to resign, or pressure the Senate itself to do something. Even Democrats can't ignore the clear ethical problem of allowing someone incapable of the job to remain in office. Of course Democrats don't want her gone, but there is very little chance she'll last out her term. On the other hand, she could have resigned and been replaced before the recall, preserving the seat until a special election. That didn't happen, so that seat might fall to a Republican. It's the Ginsberg problem just waiti

People tend to be captured by the perqs and privileges of their positions and become addicted to the power and notoriety of them. That's why people like Ginsberg and Feinstein stay in place long after they are really capable of performing their jobs at an acceptable level. They think themselves special and aren't going to let anyone take their perqs away. They forget the perqs don't belong to them, they belong to the people who lend them to office holders.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I do. Just like they do every election. There is no more proof of widespread voter fraud in California than in any other state in the union. In fact, California puts more safeguards in place than many red States.

California requires that voting systems be tested and certified by the state, that logic and accuracy testing occur prior to every election, that voting machines have a paper trail for voter verification and auditing AND they require a post election manual audit after EVERY election. Does your state do any of those things?

Cali let's illegals vote and hold public office.

That right there is the BIGGEST RED FLAG of any election ever.

 

[BluesLegend]

Do any of you actually trust California to hold a fair election?

Pie in the sky dreaming

no. Remember election fraud started in California in 2020 when a number of reliably red house seats up and turned blue. Dems called the cheating BALLOT HARVESTING.

 

[BluesLegend]

Cali let's illegals vote and hold public office.

That right there is the BIGGEST RED FLAG of any election ever.

Illegals killed my kid brother, I blame Biden and the Democrats.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Illegals killed my kid brother, I blame Biden and the Democrats.

Our illegal problem is the fault of both sides.
Outside of a handful of politicians they all just use it as a voting wedge issue.

1:08 seconds describes our elected officials PERFECTLY

 

[Seawytch]

None of that matters. Btw the evidence of voter fraud is massive. What are you talking about? All of your safeguards are still subject to the Josef-rule. He who does the counting.

Then why hasn't all of this alleged "evidence" been produced?

The counting is done by computers. That's what the audit does, make sure the computers count everything correctly.

BTW, as the ridiculous"Election Integrity Project" has discovered, every aspect of election operation in California is open to public viewing.

 

[Seawytch]

Cali let's illegals vote and hold public office.

That right there is the BIGGEST RED FLAG of any election ever.

No, "Cali" does not. Some counties allow non citizens to vote in local elections, not federal ones. And again, no they can't hold public office. They can be appointed to some boards and commissions, that's it. Seriously, get better news sources. Youtube videos are not reliable sources.

Laws permitting noncitizens to vote in the United States

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

California's new election laws: Here's what's changing in 2020

Non-citizens on government boards, impacts to vote by mail ballots, and potential polling places at college campuses are some of the new laws coming into effect.

www.cbs8.com

 

[justoffal]

I do. Just like they do every election. There is no more proof of widespread voter fraud in California than in any other state in the union. In fact, California puts more safeguards in place than many red States.

California requires that voting systems be tested and certified by the state, that logic and accuracy testing occur prior to every election, that voting machines have a paper trail for voter verification and auditing AND they require a post election manual audit after EVERY election. Does your state do any of those things?

None of that matters. Btw the evidence of voter fraud is massive. What are you talking about All of your safeguards are still subject to the Josef-rule. He who does the counting.

People tend to be captured by the perqs and privileges of their positions and become addicted to the power and notoriety of them. That's why people like Ginsberg and Feinstein stay in place long after they are really capable of performing their jobs at an acceptable level. They think themselves special and aren't going to let anyone take their perqs away. They forget the perqs don't belong to them, they belong to the people who lend them to office holders.

Absolutely

 

[justoffal]

no. Remember election fraud started in California in 2020 when a number of reliably red house seats up and turned blue. Dems called the cheating BALLOT HARVESTING.

They screwed Bernie who most definitely was more popular in Cali than Hillary ever was.
He knows it too I IMO