Bottom line: If there was even a speck of evidence of collusion, Mueller would have announced it. He didn't because there was none. In an effort to save face (and give Trump a parting '**** you') he had to ***** out from saying the POTUS committed no crimes. Thus the footnote: "But that doesn't mean he's innocent".
Uh, yeah, MF, it DOES mean he's innocent if he's not GUILTY! Be a man and admit you got nothing, you leftist sycophant.
Until we have seen the actual report..you have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what's in it.
You want to be a loyal, Trumpbot sheep and blindly believe what Barr says...go ahead.
I trust almost no one in Washington AT ALL. And I pity anyone who feels otherwise. I have some swampland for you to buy, BTW.
And until I see the ENTIRE, UNALTERED report...I am not believing anything from that hack Barr.
And unlike you (apparently), I would feel the same way if this was an investigation about a Dem POTUS and a Dem had released a summary of it.
Don't bother replying, I know what your response will be...more blind devotion and/or empty headed trust of Washington...blah.
Makes me slightly sick to read...so I won't.
NEVER TRUST A FEDERAL POLITICIAN...FROM EITHER PARTY.
We are done here.
Have a nice day.