Well, pottysammy, the sea ice is right now, with a couple of weeks yet to go in the melt season, eighth lowest on record. And all eight years have been the last eight years.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png
As for the rest of your nonsensical rant, you know where you can shove it. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University on this planer has policy statements saying that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. All ignorant assholes like you have is flap-yap and lies. Grow up.
"on this planer"???
Your simple error in spelling is a perfect example of the lack of attention to detail "globawarmingevangelistas" exhibit and one of the reasons intelligent people are skeptical about this "global warming" excitement.
Little details like this:
The basis of "global warming" theory has been these 11,000 weather stations around the world have shown temperature increases right?
So again explain to a novice like me :
Feds close 600 weather stations amid criticism they're situated to report warming thanks to temperature readings from sweltering parking lots, airports and other locations that distort the true state of the climate.
Indeed, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has closed some 600 out of nearly 9,000 weather stations over the past two years that it has deemed problematic or unnecessary, after a long campaign by one critic highlighting the problem of using unreliable data.
The agency says the closures will help improve gathering of weather data, but critics like meterologist and blogger Anthony Watts say it is too little, too late.
Distorted data Feds close 600 weather stations amid criticism they re situated to report warming Fox News
There are over 11,000 weather stations around the world measuring land, air and sea temperatures, as well as satellites, ships and aircraft that also take measurements.
Climate Observation Networks and Systems WMO
and this FACT...
when "The number of [Siberian] stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present only four (4) stations, those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to
temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass.
The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Climategatekeeping Siberia Climate Audit
So explain to me if 12.5% of the land mass' temperatures WERE NOT included, why wouldn't the temperatures be skewed higher?
Just say there was a way to add in those weather stations in 12.5% of the Earth's land mass that wasn't included AND remove those 600 stations due to distorted temperatures.
What would be then the average increase over the past 100 years?
Human errors
Finally prior to satellites and digital temperature systems a minor detail such as how mercury temperatures were read seems to be forgotten.
See humans make errors in reading temperatures but that's ok no one is perfect.
BUT when 11,000 temperature reading stations around the world before digital thermometers existed these readings were prone to errors. sometimes a degree or two off.
And these readings (before computers) were written down and digits transposed, passed on to be written down (transposed) again... so we have human errors.
When you look at the FACTS where reading stations were located
and in the case of Siberia NOT located,
and the FACTS NOAA removed because of bias
AND the facts humans make errors in reading and writing and re-entry errors before computers.. don't you and your ilk that have demonstrated this lack of attention to details
.."planer???" understand be a little more skeptical as the rest of us that are human
and realize inattention to little details...
.."planer???" have a way of getting in the way?
Little details... spelling errors
.."planer???" ... transposing errors, location errors... all of them do add up!
