My Gift to all of you - ZLAB is a stock that should consider buying now

[luiza]

Mucky and DeCrappitus share that ability to be wrong about just everything .
So in a sense they do have a use because reversing any of their judgments will invariably produce much better results .

So if Mucky says , Left , go Right .
And if , Up , go Down .

 

[Luckyone]

ZLAB generated a buy signal this past week, having closed on Friday above the high weekly close for the past 9 weeks at 18.55 (closed at 20.03). This is a clear signal that the downtrend has found a bottom at 15.96. The stock has rallied 20.4% over the last 2 weeks and that is not something that had occurred since September and this has happened without any new news coming out. The bulls did have a chance to make a bull statement, had they closed on Friday above 20.08, but given that it did not, the door is still open for a fall back to the now established weekly close support at 18.55. If the stock does continue higher and generates a weekly close above 20.64 this Friday, then such a pullback is not likely to occur. Either way, the bears have now lost control of the stock and further upside up to the $25 level is likely to be seen over the next 3-6 weeks.

For those that bought when I gave this mention, they would have gotten in around the 17.00 level, meaning this is now a PROFITABLE trade mention with a 20% profit as of now.

 

[westwall]

ZLAB generated a buy signal this past week, having closed on Friday above the high weekly close for the past 9 weeks at 18.55 (closed at 20.03). This is a clear signal that the downtrend has found a bottom at 15.96. The stock has rallied 20.4% over the last 2 weeks and that is not something that had occurred since September and this has happened without any new news coming out. The bulls did have a chance to make a bull statement, had they closed on Friday above 20.08, but given that it did not, the door is still open for a fall back to the now established weekly close support at 18.55. If the stock does continue higher and generates a weekly close above 20.64 this Friday, then such a pullback is not likely to occur. Either way, the bears have now lost control of the stock and further upside up to the $25 level is likely to be seen over the next 3-6 weeks.

For those that bought when I gave this mention, they would have gotten in around the 17.00 level, meaning this is now a PROFITABLE trade mention with a 20% profit as of now.

Sure, for those foolish enough...throw your money away, hell, set it on fire, it's the same result.

 

[Papageorgio]

ZLAB generated a buy signal this past week, having closed on Friday above the high weekly close for the past 9 weeks at 18.55 (closed at 20.03). This is a clear signal that the downtrend has found a bottom at 15.96. The stock has rallied 20.4% over the last 2 weeks and that is not something that had occurred since September and this has happened without any new news coming out. The bulls did have a chance to make a bull statement, had they closed on Friday above 20.08, but given that it did not, the door is still open for a fall back to the now established weekly close support at 18.55. If the stock does continue higher and generates a weekly close above 20.64 this Friday, then such a pullback is not likely to occur. Either way, the bears have now lost control of the stock and further upside up to the $25 level is likely to be seen over the next 3-6 weeks.

For those that bought when I gave this mention, they would have gotten in around the 17.00 level, meaning this is now a PROFITABLE trade mention with a 20% profit as of now.

Luckyone It dropped again, if someone had bought 1000 shares your suggested buy in price of $34 a share their $34000 dollars would be worth $19000, glad you don’t give out many gifts, you remind me of a scam artist. Of course you want people to buy in to your mistake to feed your obvious ego. But you don’t give a **** about others. And you criticized me for not buying into your massive con job.

 

[westwall]

Luckyone It dropped again, if someone had bought 1000 shares your suggested buy in price of $34 a share their $34000 dollars would be worth $19000, glad you don’t give out many gifts, you remind me of a scam artist. Of course you want people to buy in to your mistake to feed your obvious ego. But you don’t give a **** about others. And you criticized me for not buying into your massive con job.

I love how the wanker claims to be an analyst, but his analysis consists of "ZLAB generated a buy signal" as in ZLAB told him to flog their shit stock on some poor sod, who's now lost their asses.

 

[luiza]

ZLAB generated a buy signal this past week, having closed on Friday above the high weekly close for the past 9 weeks at 18.55 (closed at 20.03). This is a clear signal that the downtrend has found a bottom at 15.96. The stock has rallied 20.4% over the last 2 weeks and that is not something that had occurred since September and this has happened without any new news coming out. The bulls did have a chance to make a bull statement, had they closed on Friday above 20.08, but given that it did not, the door is still open for a fall back to the now established weekly close support at 18.55. If the stock does continue higher and generates a weekly close above 20.64 this Friday, then such a pullback is not likely to occur. Either way, the bears have now lost control of the stock and further upside up to the $25 level is likely to be seen over the next 3-6 weeks.

For those that bought when I gave this mention, they would have gotten in around the 17.00 level, meaning this is now a PROFITABLE trade mention with a 20% profit as of now.

Pathetic .

Just stand in the corner wearing your Dunce Cap and say nothing .

 

[Hafar1014]

ZLAB - A stock that you all should consider buying​

ZLAB is a Chinese Bio-Pharma company that traded as high as 193.54 (4 years ago) and is now trading at 34.00 (with a low made 16 months ago at 13.48.

The stock went down because the company being a Bio-Pharma company developing new medicines, was always in the red (re earnings and expenses). Nonetheless, during this time, the company has been successful in developing new medicines that in some cases have now been designated by China as "innovative" and likely to become established as needed medicines for things like Cancer, when all phases have shown success.

Some 2 years ago (when the stock got down to the lows), it was because the company required additional funds for generating sales of its products. That is now mostly over as some of its medicines are now starting to be used.

This BioPharma company has a market capitalization of $4.07 billion dollars, meaning that it is the 23rd largest Biopharma company in China.

Here is an AI generated future outlook for the company:

ZLAB has a positive future outlook with analysts projecting strong revenue growth and potential profitability within the next few years. Analysts are optimistic about the company's growth prospects, citing its expanding commercial portfolio, strong pipeline, and strategic focus o both the Chinese and global markets.

Citi has a buy rating on the company with a 12-month price target of $66

Chart-wise, since the low was made back in April 2024, the chart shows a clear up channel with 4 weekly closing points showing the bottom of the channel being presently at 33.22. The top of the channel has 2 points on it, and it shows the top of the channel presently being around the $50, a level that should be reached within the next 2-4 months.

The stock is presently oversold, meaning it is ready to buy now.

A weekly close below 32.73 would break the bottom of the channel, meaning that a purchase around here would offer a risk of approximately $125, versus a profit potential of $3200 (per 100 shares).

In my opinion, this is a BUY here and now.


Good Luck to all of you.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ZLAB/

 

[LibertyWeeps]

HA!

Not giving MY money to the CCCP!!!!!

 

[SaxonJackson]

I'm investing in rare earth mining companies. Pharma is poison.

 

[luiza]

I'm investing in rare earth mining companies. Pharma is poison.

Am convinced that our old pal Trumpfy will soon make an Executive Order permitting Rare Earth exploration in just about every location where they are believed to be --- and regardless of previous legislation .
So , for example , in the Grand Canyon .
Also , this will allow most other new mining projects , particularly Precious Metals. And especially Silver .

It will then be argued that up to $150 Trillion of Assets has been created

Namely , Debt will have vanished .

Nice one Trumpfy --- so Hurry - Up

 

[Papageorgio]

ZLAB generated a buy signal this past week, having closed on Friday above the high weekly close for the past 9 weeks at 18.55 (closed at 20.03). This is a clear signal that the downtrend has found a bottom at 15.96. The stock has rallied 20.4% over the last 2 weeks and that is not something that had occurred since September and this has happened without any new news coming out. The bulls did have a chance to make a bull statement, had they closed on Friday above 20.08, but given that it did not, the door is still open for a fall back to the now established weekly close support at 18.55. If the stock does continue higher and generates a weekly close above 20.64 this Friday, then such a pullback is not likely to occur. Either way, the bears have now lost control of the stock and further upside up to the $25 level is likely to be seen over the next 3-6 weeks.

For those that bought when I gave this mention, they would have gotten in around the 17.00 level, meaning this is now a PROFITABLE trade mention with a 20% profit as of now.

Luckyone Wow, you got a buy signal at $18.55 a share, a month ago and said it should hit $25 a share in 3-6 weeks, so 4 weeks in the stock is trading at $18.72.

At least we are seeing a $0.17 profit per share, but far from your claim of $25 a share, enter than losing almost $16 a share.

You recommend a buy at $34 a share not $17, you are just lying more and more.

The greatest gift you could give us all, is not giving us any advice.

 

[Papageorgio]

Zlab never hit the $26 that Luckyone claimed. It is doing better up to $20 a share down from $34 when Luckyone advised us to buy in at originally.

And he still maintains it is a good deal, apparently Luckyone thinks losing $14 a share on stock is a gift.

 

[westwall]

Zlab never hit the $26 that Luckyone claimed. It is doing better up to $20 a share down from $34 when Luckyone advised us to buy in at originally.

And he still maintains it is a good deal, apparently Luckyone thinks losing $14 a share on stock is a gift.

The wanker is a chinese stooge, stooging for his Chinese masters.

 

[odanny]

Zlab never hit the $26 that Luckyone claimed. It is doing better up to $20 a share down from $34 when Luckyone advised us to buy in at originally.

And he still maintains it is a good deal, apparently Luckyone thinks losing $14 a share on stock is a gift.

If you think someone can predict future success of a share price, you know nothing about the stock market, all this thread did was show the reality of investing in the stock market.

Clearly, you don't understand how all this works, and likely have never invested in the stock market before.

I don't know why you want to share this with the rest of us, but you do you.

 

[Papageorgio]

If you think someone can predict future success of a share price, you know nothing about the stock market, all this thread did was show the reality of investing in the stock market.

Clearly, you don't understand how all this works, and likely have never invested in the stock market before.

I don't know why you want to share this with the rest of us, but you do you.

I obviously know more than Luckyone because I wouldn’t recommend a stock on a message board, would never recommend to total strangers, and I wouldn’t call it a gift and I certainly would never been dumb enough to double down and tell others to buy it a second time months later.

I didn’t invest because it was a “gift” I’d never invest in a stock that is shaky to begin with, from a guy I didn’t know, on a political message board full of liars.

If that is not understanding the stock market, I’d take that over his stupid advice. Maybe he shouldn’t be an arrogant egotistical ass, it makes him look dumber than he already looks.

Idiot!

 

[The Irish Ram]

NVIDIA is my darling.
NNE is just getting started and is a good buy right now. They are manufacturing mobile nuclear power plants.

 

[Luckyone]

If you think someone can predict future success of a share price, you know nothing about the stock market, all this thread did was show the reality of investing in the stock market.

Clearly, you don't understand how all this works, and likely have never invested in the stock market before.

I don't know why you want to share this with the rest of us, but you do you.

Oh My Gawd Odanny, you are so misinformed as to be considered hilarious. First of all, this is NOT about predicting but about knowledge of what computers and algorithms depend on and use to trade. They are 70% of all the trading done in the market and they use specific chart data to trade on. They trade every day off of charts, given that they automatically buy and sell at levels where previously buying and selling occurred.

Here is a sample of what they do. The blue line is the 200 10-minute MA and all three indexes (the DOW, the SPX and the NASDAQ) were down strongly at the opening but when they got down to the line, they bounced up strongly, each and every one.

Why would they do that at that specific level?

As such, what I do is assess the odds of those levels generating bounces or selloffs and as such, I "play the odds". My approach is not to be right or wrong but to make more money than I lose, so that at the end of the year, I am profitable.

In addition, I am a trader and not usually a buy and hold person, and that means the I enter a stock using a specific level of entry point into the trade and I use a close-by stop loss and never enter a trade with less that a 4-1 reward-to-risk ratio based on where support and resistance level are located (where in the past the stock was bought and where it was sold). This was I can be wrong 75% of the time and break even (at least).

As far as my experience, I have been doing this for 49 years. I was trained by the best 2 companies in the industry back in the 80's (Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache) and I was in charge of millions of dollars of clients money.

Last but not least, I write a weekly newsletter since 2007. Here is my most recent one (last Sunday) and it is #955.

https://theoasisclub.net/smcoasnews03292026.html

By the way, I gave 2 mentions in this newsletter. They were EDC and MMM and I bought on Monday EDC at 50.15 and today (3 days later) it is at 55.47 and I sold MMM short at 144.92 on Tuesday and today it is at 144.31.

All these trades I gave a desired entry point, stop loss point and objective.......based on chart support and resistance levels.

Simply stated, I don't predict, I follow the big money based on knowing how they trade.

Remember one important thing..............fundamentals on the market and on stock do not change every day (perhaps a few times a year) but the computers and algorithms trade EVERY DAY! They don't trade the fundamentals, they trade the charts.

 

[odanny]

Oh My Gawd Odanny, you are so misinformed as to be considered hilarious. First of all, this is NOT about predicting but about knowledge of what computers and algorithms depend on and use to trade. They are 70% of all the trading done in the market and they use specific chart data to trade on. They trade every day off of charts, given that they automatically buy and sell at levels where previously buying and selling occurred.

Here is a sample of what they do. The blue line is the 200 10-minute MA and all three indexes (the DOW, the SPX and the NASDAQ) were down strongly at the opening but when they got down to the line, they bounced up strongly, each and every one.

View attachment 1238417

Why would they do that at that specific level?

As such, what I do is assess the odds of those levels generating bounces or selloffs and as such, I "play the odds". My approach is not to be right or wrong but to make more money than I lose, so that at the end of the year, I am profitable.

In addition, I am a trader and not usually a buy and hold person, and that means the I enter a stock using a specific level of entry point into the trade and I use a close-by stop loss and never enter a trade with less that a 4-1 reward-to-risk ratio based on where support and resistance level are located (where in the past the stock was bought and where it was sold). This was I can be wrong 75% of the time and break even (at least).

As far as my experience, I have been doing this for 49 years. I was trained by the best 2 companies in the industry back in the 80's (Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache) and I was in charge of millions of dollars of clients money.

Last but not least, I write a weekly newsletter since 2007. Here is my most recent one (last Sunday) and it is #955.

https://theoasisclub.net/smcoasnews03292026.html

By the way, I gave 2 mentions in this newsletter. They were EDC and MMM and I bought on Monday EDC at 50.15 and today (3 days later) it is at 55.47 and I sold MMM short at 144.92 on Tuesday and today it is at 144.31.

All these trades I gave a desired entry point, stop loss point and objective.......based on chart support and resistance levels.

Simply stated, I don't predict, I follow the big money based on knowing how they trade.

Remember one important thing..............fundamentals on the market and on stock do not change every day (perhaps a few times a year) but the computers and algorithms trade EVERY DAY! They don't trade the fundamentals, they trade the charts.

All your algorithims made you look foolish on this stock, but that's the reality of investing, and it appears you still don't understand this.

 

[Papageorgio]

Oh My Gawd Odanny, you are so misinformed as to be considered hilarious. First of all, this is NOT about predicting but about knowledge of what computers and algorithms depend on and use to trade. They are 70% of all the trading done in the market and they use specific chart data to trade on. They trade every day off of charts, given that they automatically buy and sell at levels where previously buying and selling occurred.

Here is a sample of what they do. The blue line is the 200 10-minute MA and all three indexes (the DOW, the SPX and the NASDAQ) were down strongly at the opening but when they got down to the line, they bounced up strongly, each and every one.

View attachment 1238417

Why would they do that at that specific level?

As such, what I do is assess the odds of those levels generating bounces or selloffs and as such, I "play the odds". My approach is not to be right or wrong but to make more money than I lose, so that at the end of the year, I am profitable.

In addition, I am a trader and not usually a buy and hold person, and that means the I enter a stock using a specific level of entry point into the trade and I use a close-by stop loss and never enter a trade with less that a 4-1 reward-to-risk ratio based on where support and resistance level are located (where in the past the stock was bought and where it was sold). This was I can be wrong 75% of the time and break even (at least).

As far as my experience, I have been doing this for 49 years. I was trained by the best 2 companies in the industry back in the 80's (Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache) and I was in charge of millions of dollars of clients money.

Last but not least, I write a weekly newsletter since 2007. Here is my most recent one (last Sunday) and it is #955.

https://theoasisclub.net/smcoasnews03292026.html

By the way, I gave 2 mentions in this newsletter. They were EDC and MMM and I bought on Monday EDC at 50.15 and today (3 days later) it is at 55.47 and I sold MMM short at 144.92 on Tuesday and today it is at 144.31.

All these trades I gave a desired entry point, stop loss point and objective.......based on chart support and resistance levels.

Simply stated, I don't predict, I follow the big money based on knowing how they trade.

Remember one important thing..............fundamentals on the market and on stock do not change every day (perhaps a few times a year) but the computers and algorithms trade EVERY DAY! They don't trade the fundamentals, they trade the charts.

You just don’t know Luckyone when to quit. You had someone defending you and in your egotistical arrogance can’t see it and double down on your insanity.

I use AI and algorithms but I also do research as well that goes beyond and I miss at times, but I am not stupid enough to double down on being stupid. Congrats on the ability to make yourself look dumber and dumber in this thread.

 

[Luckyone]

All your algorithims made you look foolish on this stock, but that's the reality of investing, and it appears you still don't understand this.

Well then, let me prove you wrong another way.

I originally gave this mention on August 21st when the stock was trading at 33.94 with a stop loss at 32.73 and stated that the stop loss of $125 dollars lower would keep the loss to a small amount. As such, if you had entered the stock and I suggested, you would have lost $125 per 100 shares. If you look at the thread, you will see that I gave a second mention in February (see post #105) when the stock was trading at 17.01. I said the stop loss would be at 16.10, meaning about a $90 risk (per 100 shares). The stock is presently trading at 20.64, meaning you would be up $363 per 100 shares.

As such, a loss of $120 and a gain of $363, means you would UP $243 per 100 shares.

You would be up with a profit and not a loss.

By the way, here is the analysts recommendations for ZLAB

Should I buy or sell ZLAB stock?​

According to 5 analysts, ZLAB has a Buy consensus rating as of Apr 2, 2026. This rating is provided by third-party analysts and is not investment advice from Public.com.

These are not MY recommendation but those of 5 individual analysts who say the following, as of today when it is at 20.64!:

Strong Buy 40%
Buy 60%
Hold 0%
Sell 0%
Strong Sell 0%