My Gift to all of you - ZLAB is a stock that should consider buying now

ZLAB - A stock that you all should consider buying​


ZLAB is a Chinese Bio-Pharma company that traded as high as 193.54 (4 years ago) and is now trading at 34.00 (with a low made 16 months ago at 13.48.

The stock went down because the company being a Bio-Pharma company developing new medicines, was always in the red (re earnings and expenses). Nonetheless, during this time, the company has been successful in developing new medicines that in some cases have now been designated by China as "innovative" and likely to become established as needed medicines for things like Cancer, when all phases have shown success.

Some 2 years ago (when the stock got down to the lows), it was because the company required additional funds for generating sales of its products. That is now mostly over as some of its medicines are now starting to be used.

This BioPharma company has a market capitalization of $4.07 billion dollars, meaning that it is the 23rd largest Biopharma company in China.

Here is an AI generated future outlook for the company:

ZLAB has a positive future outlook with analysts projecting strong revenue growth and potential profitability within the next few years. Analysts are optimistic about the company's growth prospects, citing its expanding commercial portfolio, strong pipeline, and strategic focus o both the Chinese and global markets.

Citi has a buy rating on the company with a 12-month price target of $66

Chart-wise, since the low was made back in April 2024, the chart shows a clear up channel with 4 weekly closing points showing the bottom of the channel being presently at 33.22. The top of the channel has 2 points on it, and it shows the top of the channel presently being around the $50, a level that should be reached within the next 2-4 months.

The stock is presently oversold, meaning it is ready to buy now.

A weekly close below 32.73 would break the bottom of the channel, meaning that a purchase around here would offer a risk of approximately $125, versus a profit potential of $3200 (per 100 shares).

In my opinion, this is a BUY here and now.


Good Luck to all of you.
August 21, $33.94
December 1, $19.94
How long in such a good stock market that we have, should we wait for a profit?
You do realize that this lab is located in Shanghai, China, right?
Why would I invest in China? Why would you promote a stock from China?
 
I rebought today at 19.94. Stop loss is at 17.65 and objective is 31.32. I am risking $229 to pick up $1138 (per 100 shares). It is a 4.3-1 risk/reward ratio. This $20 area is a strong and established support level that should not be broken.
I'm sure you wouldn't make a good financial advisor.
baffle them with bullshit.
 
I'm sure you wouldn't make a good financial advisor.
baffle them with bullshit.
You sure of that? I was "officially and after getting my certificate" a financial advisor for Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache in the 80's and handled over $1.5 billion dollars of client's money, and both companies were satisfied with my handling of those accounts for 7 years. Heck, Pru-Bache even paid me a bonus upfront of $40,000 to move from Merrill Lynch to them. Evidently, you don't know me very well, do you?
 
You sure of that? I was "officially and after getting my certificate" a financial advisor for Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache in the 80's and handled over $1.5 billion dollars of client's money, and both companies were satisfied with my handling of those accounts for 7 years. Heck, Pru-Bache even paid me a bonus upfront of $40,000 to move from Merrill Lynch to them. Evidently, you don't know me very well, do you?

1764614725057.webp
 
August 21, $33.94
December 1, $19.94
How long in such a good stock market that we have, should we wait for a profit?
You do realize that this lab is located in Shanghai, China, right?
Why would I invest in China? Why would you promote a stock from China?
From my OP:

A weekly close below 32.73 would break the bottom of the channel, meaning that a purchase around here would offer a risk of approximately $125, versus a profit potential of $3200 (per 100 shares).

A purchase at 33.94 and getting out around $32.73 would mean a loss of $120 per 100 shares. Ever hear of the word "trading"? Ever hear of the idea of making more profits than losses at the end of the year, knowing that both (wins and losses) are to occur repeatedly during that period of time?

You do see that I suggested people to buy at a SPECIFIC price and get out of the trade at a SPECIFIC price, don't you?

Why then are you suggesting that I bought as 33.94 and that I am losing 35% of my investment right now?

Are you able to explain that?
 
I rebought today at 19.94. Stop loss is at 17.65 and objective is 31.32. I am risking $229 to pick up $1138 (per 100 shares). It is a 4.3-1 risk/reward ratio. This $20 area is a strong and established support level that should not be broken.
Objective is $31.32, that is less than when you initially gave your gift to us! lol!
 
Anyone that bought at luckyone’s advice level has lot a lot of money and all he is doing is justifying the loss.

He is not a professional he is a fake and a fraud.

Don’t listen to him! He has cost people money and now he is doubling down.

Sad such a scammer is allowed on this board.
 
From my OP:

A weekly close below 32.73 would break the bottom of the channel, meaning that a purchase around here would offer a risk of approximately $125, versus a profit potential of $3200 (per 100 shares).

A purchase at 33.94 and getting out around $32.73 would mean a loss of $120 per 100 shares. Ever hear of the word "trading"? Ever hear of the idea of making more profits than losses at the end of the year, knowing that both (wins and losses) are to occur repeatedly during that period of time?

You do see that I suggested people to buy at a SPECIFIC price and get out of the trade at a SPECIFIC price, don't you?

Why then are you suggesting that I bought as 33.94 and that I am losing 35% of my investment right now?

Are you able to explain that?
You do realize that most individuals are not traders, they are investors.
You know, the kind that buys and holds.
You really are a phony, and if people actually do listen to you, they deserve to lose their money.
 
You do realize that most individuals are not traders, they are investors.
You know, the kind that buys and holds.
You really are a phony, and if people actually do listen to you, they deserve to lose their money.
Everyone here knows (from day one) that I am a trader as in every single one of those mentions I have made, I have included a STOP LOSS point, which investors never use or have, meaning that, in and of itself, means it is a TRADING mention and not an investing mention.

You truly are trying to bury me, but you never have any ammunition with which to do it (except in your brain).

I am the furthest thing from a phony given that I have offered a subscription service since 2007 that is out there in the public eye with every trade I have ever done and all the profits and losses sustained. That is the exact opposite of being a phony.

I think that you are looking in the mirror and seeing what you are and then trying to blame others for it.
 
You sure of that? I was "officially and after getting my certificate" a financial advisor for Merrill Lynch and Pru-Bache in the 80's and handled over $1.5 billion dollars of client's money, and both companies were satisfied with my handling of those accounts for 7 years. Heck, Pru-Bache even paid me a bonus upfront of $40,000 to move from Merrill Lynch to them. Evidently, you don't know me very well, do you?
Well, we do know that the stock you recommended a $35 is now trading at $20.
 
Everyone here knows (from day one) that I am a trader as in every single one of those mentions I have made, I have included a STOP LOSS point, which investors never use or have, meaning that, in and of itself, means it is a TRADING mention and not an investing mention.

You truly are trying to bury me, but you never have any ammunition with which to do it (except in your brain).

I am the furthest thing from a phony given that I have offered a subscription service since 2007 that is out there in the public eye with every trade I have ever done and all the profits and losses sustained. That is the exact opposite of being a phony.

I think that you are looking in the mirror and seeing what you are and then trying to blame others for it.

Nice deflection. Show me where I'm wrong in my prior post.

Perhaps you should read the room before you throw out your bullshit.

Your OP suggested people invest in your Chinese stock.

You are a phony who needs to have his ego stroked, we've talked about this before.
You're not impressing me, and I'd like to hear from anyone on this board that you've impressed.
Next week why don't you tell us all about your day trading success. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Nice deflection. Show me where I'm wrong in my prior post.

Perhaps you should read the room before you throw out your bullshit.

Your OP suggested people invest in your Chinese stock.

You are a phony who needs to have his ego stroked, we've talked about this before.
You're not impressing me, and I'd like to hear from anyone on this board that you've impressed.
Next week why don't you tell us all about your day trading success. :auiqs.jpg:
Sigh, you truly are blind-by-choice and hateful of anyone that doesn't fit your parameters of behavior, beliefs, and communication.

Show me where in my OP is the word "invest" stated.

In fact and apart from the fact that I gave a stated stop loss point that proves it was NOT and investment, here is something else I stated in the OP:

"Chart-wise, since the low was made back in April 2024, the chart shows a clear up channel with 4 weekly closing points showing the bottom of the channel being presently at 33.22. The top of the channel has 2 points on it, and it shows the top of the channel presently being around the $50, a level that should be reached within the next 2-4 months."

Does your mind have the ability to realize that this paragraph states a channel is established (channel being a chart event) and that breakage of that channel would negate the idea of the purchase?

Are you CAPABLE of understanding?
 
Sigh, you truly are blind-by-choice and hateful of anyone that doesn't fit your parameters of behavior, beliefs, and communication.

Show me where in my OP is the word "invest" stated.

In fact and apart from the fact that I gave a stated stop loss point that proves it was NOT and investment, here is something else I stated in the OP:

"Chart-wise, since the low was made back in April 2024, the chart shows a clear up channel with 4 weekly closing points showing the bottom of the channel being presently at 33.22. The top of the channel has 2 points on it, and it shows the top of the channel presently being around the $50, a level that should be reached within the next 2-4 months."

Does your mind have the ability to realize that this paragraph states a channel is established (channel being a chart event) and that breakage of that channel would negate the idea of the purchase?

Are you CAPABLE of understanding?
You really are incapable of reading the room.

It sound more like you're in college taking an economics class.
 
Well, we do know that the stock you recommended a $35 is now trading at $20.
In 2013, there was a stock I traded 18 times during the year and traded on both sides (as a purchaser and as a short-seller of the stock). I had 11 profitable trades and 7 losing trades. The stock traded within a $21 trading range ($21-$42). Had you bought it in February 2013 and kept it until February 2014, you would have made a $7 profit per 100 shares. During that same period of time and my trading the stock 18 times, I made $35 per 100 shares, AFTER losses and commissions were subtracted.
 
You really are incapable of reading the room.

It sound more like you're in college taking an economics class.
I know, most of you are incapable of understanding anything that is not simply simple. Anything that requires knowledge, understanding-of-out-of-the-ordinary-thinking, and progressive is beyond your means (what the room is all about)
 
15th post
In 2013, there was a stock I traded 18 times during the year and traded on both sides (as a purchaser and as a short-seller of the stock). I had 11 profitable trades and 7 losing trades. The stock traded within a $21 trading range ($21-$42). Had you bought it in February 2013 and kept it until February 2014, you would have made a $7 profit per 100 shares. During that same period of time and my trading the stock 18 times, I made $35 per 100 shares, AFTER losses and commissions were subtracted.
Who really gives a shit what you did?
You were soliciting a Chinese stock for others on this board to consider.
And it went down. :auiqs.jpg:
 
In 2013, there was a stock I traded 18 times during the year and traded on both sides (as a purchaser and as a short-seller of the stock). I had 11 profitable trades and 7 losing trades. The stock traded within a $21 trading range ($21-$42). Had you bought it in February 2013 and kept it until February 2014, you would have made a $7 profit per 100 shares. During that same period of time and my trading the stock 18 times, I made $35 per 100 shares, AFTER losses and commissions were subtracted.
Don't be afraid to make other recommendations even though ZLAB has been a dud. That's what this board is for.
 
I have repeatedly laughed at Mucky Bum , at his childish political and financial opinions and his claimed background .
A true Conspiracy Tout .

His company recommendation and "Gift" has fallen disastrously .
A near wipe -out .

At the same time I was shouting for and continue to recommend Gold and Silver .
You can back them with your your life if you feel really passionate . No luck needed .

I have backed them , and since the the times of Gold being around 1500 and Silver below 20 .
Huge success but I tell you that the long term moves have barely started .

Any scenario you choose , right up to Gold in excess of 20 000 and Silver above 500 .

You are still on the cusp of a once in a life time opportunity .
But imho , of course

Throw Mucky a Xmas coffee --poor old Fake .
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom