My Folks were immigrants, they didn't own anyone

[IM2]

There is no unified "white culture" or attitude. I have nothing in common with the white liberal society elite, or the good old white boy southern culture or any number of other white culture.

Yes you do. You're a racist. And if their is a black culture there is a white culture.

 

[Dragonlady]

.....says the revolting subhuman that learned nothing from the Holocaust.

What do "we learn" from the spin being offered in the OP?

That black people should permanently be in a pissy mood about honkies because of something that happened more than a century ago before anyone around was even alive?

Sounds like something designed to promote victimhood and permanent loyalty to a political party that supports that ideology.


What we should be trying to do as a people is to unite as one under real leadership like that offered by Donald J. Trump, Mehmet Oz and other forward thinkers who aren't concerned about racial divides.

You must be exhausted jumping to all of these conclusions.

If you think black people are pissed about something that happened 100 years ago, you couldn’t be more wrong. George Floyd was murdered in 2020.

When the McMichael’s chased down and murdered Ahmed Arbery, they cited a slavery era law which says that any white man can question any black man on the road by himself.

When the 14th Amendment ended slavery, it did nothing about the laws, social systems and institutional structures which supported slavery and racial discrimination.

 

[IM2]

You must be exhausted jumping to all of these conclusions.

If you think black people are pissed about something that happened 100 years ago, you couldn’t be more wrong. George Floyd was murdered in 2020.

When the McMichael’s chased down and murdered Ahmed Arbery, they cited a slavery era law which says that any white man can question any black man on the road by himself.

When the 14th Amendment ended slavery, it did nothing about the laws, social systems and institutional structures which supported slavery and racial discrimination.

Racist white Americans live in denial. They tell themselves we are complaining about slavery instead of understanding that we are talking about the cumulative harm created by an American system based on white racial preference.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

ALL RISE!

This mornings lesson:

MY FOLKS WERE IMMIGRANTS, THEY DIDN'T OWN ANYONE!

After slavery, blacks were being killed by whites with no crimes charged while the Supreme Court basically repealed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments with a series of rulings. Due the consistent state and federally protected barbaric acts by whites, southern blacks felt they had to go north. When blacks started moving north, southern business and government leaders enacted laws in order to stop free people from going where they could earn a decent living. But even under the threat of jail or death, millions of blacks headed north where they believe they'd be treated right. If they had known what was waiting up north, the migration would have ended in Canada.

As blacks went north they found that the only difference between a southern white and a northern one was geography. When blacks went north, so did lynchings. They are recorded as race riots, but the reality is that there were a series of massacres, bombings, lynchings and other acts of terror against blacks by whites due to the northern migration of blacks trying to escape massacres, bombings, lynchings and other acts of terror against blacks by whites in the south. Historians call what happened riots and this is why it’s so hilarious to listen to the disingenuous fake outrage of the racist white subculture about blacks and riots today.

On the evening of Saturday July 19th, 1919, in Washington D.C., a group of white veterans started a rumor about a black man suspected of sexually assaulting the wife of a white Navy man. This rumor spread throughout the bars and restaurants in downtown Washington D.C. Later that night, a mob of drunken mad white men headed to a predominantly black neighborhood carrying weapons. Those mad white men proceeded to beat all the blacks they found. They snatched blacks out of their cars or off sidewalks and beat them for no reason. Where were the police? I think they had donut shops back then, but I am not sure. The violence continued into Sunday because the D.C. Metro Police failed to stop it. Random blacks got beat down on the streets of Washington. This even happened in front of the White House.

The Omaha Race Riot occurred on September 28–29, 1919. Three conditions: black property acquisition, economic anxiety and claims of black male sexual aggression, have been the general standard for white violence against blacks throughout American history. The Omaha Riots met at least 2 of the 3 conditions. The lynching of Will Brown was started by reports in local media about the alleged rape of a woman on September 25, 1919. The following day the police arrested Brown. Brown was blamed for the rape without the victim making a positive identification. There was an attempt to lynch Brown on the day of his arrest, but it failed.

The Omaha Bee publicized the incident claiming it was part of a series of alleged attacks on white women by black men in Omaha. The Bee was controlled by Thomas Rosewater who was a friends with a man named Thomas Dennison. Dennison ran a political machine that controlled Omaha at that time. To be blunt, Dennison was a crook. He controlled Omaha for 18 years before the city elected a non-Dennison flunky for mayor. His name was Edward Smith. Denison did not like that, so to make Smith look bad, Dennisons men ran amuck throughout the town wearing blackface while assaulting women and blamed blacks for it. These incidents were orchestrated by Dennison and Rosewaters paper pumped up the fake news. So thanks to his buddy at the Omaha Bee, Dennison and his friends race baited the people of Omaha and incited the Omaha Riots. On the night of the lynching, Omaha Police even caught one of Dennisons men wearing blackface. Dennison nor any of his associates were charged or convicted for what they did. Will Brown was not so fortunate. Brown was lynched, shot up after he was dead, dragged through the streets of Omaha and set on fire. He had committed no crime.

White mob violence did not end in 1919. One of the worst acts of domestic terrorism in America happened in two days of American history beginning on May 31st, 1921 in Tulsa Oklahoma. This is better known as “The Tulsa Massacre.” One may as well say this was an act of war waged on the black citizens of Tulsa Oklahoma by white citizens. I say this because not only were blacks attacked on the ground they were attacked by air. In a manner best described by the scene of Ben Richards being told to shoot the people during a food riot in “The Running Man”, whites in private planes flew over the black community shooting down on blacks and firebombing black homes and businesses.

“I could see planes circling in mid-air. They grew in number and hummed, darted and dipped low. I could hear something like hail falling upon the top of my office building. Down East Archer, I saw the old Mid-Way hotel on fire, burning from its top, and then another and another and another building began to burn from their top,”


B.C. Franklin​

The excuse by city law enforcement officials was that the planes were reconnaissance used to protect against a Negro uprising. Still today, an accurate accounting of the number of dead varies. More than 6,000 people were either admitted to hospitals or sent to other large facilities for care. More than 10,000 blacks were left homeless. The bombings and ground attacks destroyed 35 city blocks of Tulsa, resulting in damages that equaled over 32 million dollars in today’s money. None of the victims or their descendants have been compensated for this act of terror to this day. Pretty soon blacks in Tulsa will have to hear that sad, sorry song that starts with, “I was not alive then.”

I just don’t think people really understand just exactly how bad things have been for blacks after leaving Africa when they start trying to blame blacks for the slave trade or slave ownership. I am waiting for the day somebody white tries to say that blacks created the black codes, sundown towns and Jim Crow. This is the state of the madness here in America at this time. Whites have complained about political correctness and yet when political incorrectness is applied to them, suddenly things must be forgotten, revised, altered or kept quiet.

On December 23, 1945, Mr. and Mrs. H. O’Day Short and their 2 children were burned to death in Fontana California. The description of this was; “A fire of incendiary origions set by persons who did not want them to move into the white community.” Before they were murdered the family was threatened and got no protection from the police. According to the report, the Shorts had no electricity and was using gas lamps at the time they moved in. This was supposed to be temporary. While the Shorts were out of the house, people broke in, sprayed the house with a flammable chemical and when the Shorts got home and started lighting their lamps, the house went up in flames.

For the first 5 years after WW2 in Chicago alone, there were 357 acts of terror by whites against blacks who tried living in or near majority white neighborhoods. In 1951 a black man named Harvey Clark and his family tried to move into the Cicero neighborhood of Chicago. A white mob vandalized his home the burned his furniture. Aside from trying to force Clark out of his own home, the police did nothing. In first six months of 1955 there were 213 acts of violence against blacks by whites is Philadelphia. These were acts of terror committed to intimidate blacks so they would not move into white communities. In 1964 when blacks again tried renting an apartment in Cicero, their apartment was again vandalized. After the apartment was vandalized, police entered the apartment, took out the furniture and told the renters they had been evicted. At the same time, in Detroit there were over 200 acts of violence against blacks by whites to terrorize black families so they would not move to the suburbs. From 1950-1965 there were over 100 bombings of black owned residences in Los Angeles. In 1987, another black family tried moving into Cicero. Whites responded with gunfire and firebombs.

This kind of terrorism has gone long ignored in understanding the brutality and long-lasting effects of such acts upon blacks in America. For decades prosperous blacks were terrorized while black communities were destroyed by mobs of angry whites who felt they were losing out because blacks had acquired the same things whites had. Ignored was the fact that blacks worked hard to get what they had, but that did not matter because blacks were to always be lesser than whites and the caste was to be created and maintained by any means necessary.

Blacks peacefully moved north to compete for same opportunities white immigrants had and this is just a small bit of what happened. White immigrants are the ones who committed the violence against blacks. White immigrants destroyed thriving black communities. The same white immigrants whose descendants tell us today how they are not responsible because their ancestors did not own slaves.

Chris Wolfgang, Mafiosi and Madams, Omaha Magazine, August 29, 2013, https://omahamagazine.com/articles/tag/edward-parsons-smith/

Dennison’s Political Machine, Dennison’s Political Machine

B.C Franklin, The Tulsa Race Riots and Three of It’s Victims, A Long-Lost Manuscript Contains a Searing Eyewitness Account of the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921

William L. Patterson, We Charge Genocide, 4th edition, International Publishers Co., Inc., New York, 2017 pp.60-61

Richard Rothstein, Color of Law, Liverright Publishing, pp.144, 145, 147, 2018

Jae Jones, Cicero Race Riot: Mob of 4,000 Destroys Apartment Building with One Black Family Tenants, November 14, 2018, Cicero Race Riot: Mob of 4,000 Destroys Apartment Building with One Black Family Tenantsblack-family-tenants/

Charles Abrams, The Time Bomb That Exploded in Cicero: Segregated Housing's Inevitable Dividend, The Time Bomb That Exploded in Cicero:Segregated Housing's Inevitable Dividend

Christy Clark-Pujara and Anna-Lisa Cox, How the Myth of a Liberal North Erases a Long History of White Violence, smithsonianmag.com, August 27, 2020, How the Myth of a Liberal North Erases a Long History of White Violence

Why don't you move to South Africa so you can legally kill whitey and have a better chance of success?

 

[Dragonlady]

.....says the revolting subhuman that learned nothing from the Holocaust.

You actually think you know anything about me. Clearly you know NOTHING about me. I spent years studying the Holocaust because I couldn’t fathom how decent people could treat their fellow human beings so horribly.

What did YOU learn from the Holocaust? Given the treatment of refugees in the USA today, I would say NOTHING. YOU call refugees “illegal immigrants” and won’t let them in. You follow leaders who oppose any form of immigration. And who locked up 40,000 people in filthy and dangerous camps along the border for the crime of trespassing.

You’re in no position to try to imply that I’ve learned nothing from the past.

You subscribed to Donald Trump’s white nationalist rhetoric and cheered when he refused to let refugees into the country. His casting of “others” as a danger to the American people. Trump used Hilter’s anti-Jewish propaganda as a tutorial talking about immigrants as subhuman - an infestation.

How many Syrians did you take in? How many Haitians? You’re already complaining about the number of refugees from Afghanistan, and even the Ukrainians are having a hard time getting into the US.

When people flee for their lives, they don’t generally have time to complete the paperwork and wait two years. You’re treating todays refugees the same way you treated the Jews during the Holocaust.



When the Holocaust happened, no one would take in Jew fleeing from Germany. When asked how many Jewish refugees Canada would take, the immigration minister famously said “None is too many”. The US and European nations did no better.

 

[MizMolly]

So now you're deleting posts that you don't like while others can post off topic all they want. You aren't interested in truth. You read the responses made here then try telling me how racism from whites is in the past. That's an untruth in and of itself. If we use culture and attitude as an excuse for racism white CULTURE and the attitudes of whites like YOU give us plenty of reason. And really, your cognitive dissonance allows you to ignore the multiple drunken riots and violence by whites at various festivals and events almost annually. Riots that happen for no reason, like the attack on the capital.

The Jan. 6 insurrection was not a solely white affair. What compelled others to join?

What would draw people of color to the U.S. Capitol insurrection — a scenario that could have resulted in more aggressive law enforcement tactics?

www.northjersey.com

 

[MizMolly]

All Americans have benefited from hundreds of years of slavery through the government that allowed it. Slaves built this country. Descendants of slaves need to be paid reparation. Just as Natives were paid.

Slaves HELPED build this country. There were more working white people. Land was stolen from Native Americans.

 

[MizMolly]

Don't deflect like a coward. Perhaps your energy would best be spent combatting the racism which remains, to clean up the rest of the shit rather than leaving some of it still festering in the minds of Trump supporters and stinking up the place!

No defection here. Not a Trump supporter either. You can’t change a racists mind. I have argued with racists, both white and black.

 

[Dragonlady]

Slaves HELPED build this country. There were more working white people. Land was stolen from Native Americans.

Lives were stolen from slaves. Women were raped by white owners, children were sold away from their parents. The income these people generated enriched their owners and their descendants, not the slaves.

When emancipation came, the white slave owners received reparations for their loss of property, but the slaves didn’t even get the 40 acres and a mule they were promised.

Slaves built the South. Americans created chattel slavery which didn’t exist outside the USA. Slavery existed for centuries but the idea of slaves having commercial value didn’t exist.

Reparations are owed.

 

[IM2]

Lives were stolen from slaves. Women were raped by white owners, children were sold away from their parents. The income these people generated enriched their owners and their descendants, not the slaves.

When emancipation came, the white slave owners received reparations for their loss of property, but the slaves didn’t even get the 40 acres and a mule they were promised.

Slaves built the South. Americans created chattel slavery which didn’t exist outside the USA. Slavery existed for centuries but the idea of slaves having commercial value didn’t exist.

Reparations are owed.

Molly is ignorant. Whites got paid to work. Blacks did not. Indians get reparations right now even though there is really no amount this government can pay that settles their debt.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Lives were stolen from slaves. Women were raped by white owners, children were sold away from their parents. The income these people generated enriched their owners and their descendants, not the slaves.

When emancipation came, the white slave owners received reparations for their loss of property, but the slaves didn’t even get the 40 acres and a mule they were promised.

Slaves built the South. Americans created chattel slavery which didn’t exist outside the USA. Slavery existed for centuries but the idea of slaves having commercial value didn’t exist.

Reparations are owed.

Those damn democrats continue using blacks like they did in old days gone by.

 

[IM2]

ALL RISE!

Todays lesson:

SLAVERY CREATED WHITE JOBS!

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”27

In today’s money, slaves were worth over 127 billion dollars. That is a conservative estimate, meaning the amount could be even more. In 1860 the total value of slaves was 17- and one-half times more than the money circulating in the economy. Slaves were worth more than the gold, silver, total U.S. currency, plus all the farmland in the South combined in 1860, but did not receive a dime. Remember that enslaved people were considered property. Because they were, the following activity could occur.

In the 1830s, powerful Southern slaveowners wanted to import capital into their states so they could buy more slaves. They came up with a new, two-part idea: mortgaging slaves; and then turning the mortgages into bonds that could be marketed all over the world.

First, American planters organized new banks, usually in new states like Mississippi and Louisiana. Drawing up lists of slaves for collateral, the planters then mortgaged them to the banks they had created, enabling themselves to buy additional slaves to expand cotton production. To provide capital for those loans, the banks sold bonds to investors from around the globe — London, New York, Amsterdam, Paris. The bond buyers, many of whom lived in countries where slavery was illegal, didn’t own individual slaves — just bonds backed by their value. Planters’ mortgage payments paid the interest and the principle on these bond payments. Enslaved human beings had been, in modern financial lingo, “securitized.”

As slave-backed mortgages became paper bonds, everybody profited — except, obviously, enslaved African Americans whose forced labor repaid owners’ mortgages. But investors owed a piece of slave-earned income. Older slave states such as Maryland and Virginia sold slaves to the new cotton states, at securitization-inflated prices, resulting in slave asset bubble. Cotton factor firms like the now-defunct Lehman Brothers — founded in Alabama — became wildly successful. Lehman moved to Wall Street, and for all these firms, every transaction in slave-earned money flowing in and out of the U.S. earned Wall Street firms a fee.

The infant American financial industry nourished itself on profits taken from financing slave traders, cotton brokers and underwriting slave-backed bonds. But though slavery ended in 1865, in the years after the Civil War, black entrepreneurs would find themselves excluded from a financial system originally built on their bodies.

Edward E. Baptist and Louis Hyman, American Finance Grew on the Back of Slaves, Chicago Sun-Times.com March 7, 2014, derived from: American Finance Grew on the Back of Slaves

 

[IM2]

Those damn democrats continue using blacks like they did in old days gone by.

Republicans today love telling blacks how the Democratic Party was pro-slavery and how it was the Republican Party that freed the slaves. There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell young blacks as they try luring blacks into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Party had several factions in the beginning. One was the Radical Republicans. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.

"I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause] ... I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

Those who have studied Lincoln claim that his views evolved. Did they? The Second Confiscation Act in 1862 had provisions for the colonization of blacks who chose to leave. Both Dr. Henry Louis Gates and the 1619 Project have written about a meeting between blacks and Lincoln whereby he made insulting comments to them, blamed blacks for the Civil War, and demanded they accept his plan to resettle blacks outside of America. According to both sources, on Aug. 14, 1862, Lincoln met with black representatives at the White House to try getting blacks to accept getting shipped out of the country. They refused.

Once Abraham Lincoln was elected, Southern states started leaving. Between Lincoln's victory and his inauguration, seven states seceded. They knew his opposition to slavery could mean the end of the practice. As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. They wanted to keep the union together. They did not want the south to leave. They did not want war. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union. He wanted Congress to assure the southern states that slavery would be protected once Lincoln took office. Congress offered over 50 different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

The Corwin Amendment was proposed in 1861. It passed both houses of Congress and was then signed by President Buchanan on his way out of office. When Lincoln took over, he supported the Amendment.

As it appeared the south would lose, the attempt to ratify the amendment was withdrawn from consideration by states due to a senate resolution, ending the effort to ratify The Corwin Amendment. Had the south accepted the terms of The REPUBLICAN Corwin Amendment, it would have become the thirteenth amendment. America came very close to making slavery a constitutionally protected practice that could only have been repealed by passage of a new amendment with votes by 2/3rds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by 3/4ths of the states. That has only happened once in American history-the repeal of prohibition.

 

[IM2]

Why don't you move to South Africa so you can legally kill whitey and have a better chance of success?

Since you bitch about a government that has provided you with every preference, why don't you move to Eastern Europe where there are no blacks for you to hate?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lives were stolen from slaves. Women were raped by white owners, children were sold away from their parents. The income these people generated enriched their owners and their descendants, not the slaves.

When emancipation came, the white slave owners received reparations for their loss of property, but the slaves didn’t even get the 40 acres and a mule they were promised.

Slaves built the South. Americans created chattel slavery which didn’t exist outside the USA. Slavery existed for centuries but the idea of slaves having commercial value didn’t exist.

Reparations are owed.

When emancipation came, the white slave owners received reparations for their loss of property,

How much? Link?

Slaves built the South.

And then the northern armies broke and burned it.

Reparations are owed.

Every living slave owner should pay every living slave.
Beyond that, piss off.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Republicans today love telling blacks how the Democratic Party was pro-slavery and how it was the Republican Party that freed the slaves. There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell young blacks as they try luring blacks into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Party had several factions in the beginning. One was the Radical Republicans. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.

"I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause] ... I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

Those who have studied Lincoln claim that his views evolved. Did they? The Second Confiscation Act in 1862 had provisions for the colonization of blacks who chose to leave. Both Dr. Henry Louis Gates and the 1619 Project have written about a meeting between blacks and Lincoln whereby he made insulting comments to them, blamed blacks for the Civil War, and demanded they accept his plan to resettle blacks outside of America. According to both sources, on Aug. 14, 1862, Lincoln met with black representatives at the White House to try getting blacks to accept getting shipped out of the country. They refused.

Once Abraham Lincoln was elected, Southern states started leaving. Between Lincoln's victory and his inauguration, seven states seceded. They knew his opposition to slavery could mean the end of the practice. As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. They wanted to keep the union together. They did not want the south to leave. They did not want war. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union. He wanted Congress to assure the southern states that slavery would be protected once Lincoln took office. Congress offered over 50 different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

The Corwin Amendment was proposed in 1861. It passed both houses of Congress and was then signed by President Buchanan on his way out of office. When Lincoln took over, he supported the Amendment.

As it appeared the south would lose, the attempt to ratify the amendment was withdrawn from consideration by states due to a senate resolution, ending the effort to ratify The Corwin Amendment. Had the south accepted the terms of The REPUBLICAN Corwin Amendment, it would have become the thirteenth amendment. America came very close to making slavery a constitutionally protected practice that could only have been repealed by passage of a new amendment with votes by 2/3rds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by 3/4ths of the states. That has only happened once in American history-the repeal of prohibition.

Dumb shit the reason for the 3/5th clause was to prevent the democrats from using their slaves for representation in the house.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

SLAVERY CREATED WHITE JOBS!

Blacks still do.
Social workers, police, prison guards, parole officers........and more!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Since you bitch about a government that has provided you with every preference, why don't you move to Eastern Europe where there are no blacks for you to hate.

I don't hate the country I hate the democrats that have tried to destroy the country.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

IM2

Comprehend this my Silly Black Friend,

We need to have a constitutional convention to go over all of your grievances and recognize that the subsisting government is probably not designed to accommodate your grievances, and all of the other grievances that it is competing with for attention. Ultimately, it would seem that Black Americans would be inspired by the venture of participating in such a convention, but it appears that you do trust the Constitution.

 

[Dragonlady]

When emancipation came, the white slave owners received reparations for their loss of property,

How much? Link?

Slaves built the South.

And then the northern armies broke and burned it.

Reparations are owed.

Every living slave owner should pay every living slave.
Beyond that, piss off.

How fucking lazy are you. Are you utterly incapable of using Google???

Every time you ask for a link to something you should have known, and could easily check for yourself in mere seconds, you look like an entitled, arrogant asshole, which of course, is no surprise.

Opinion | When Slaveowners Got Reparations (Published 2019)

Lincoln signed a bill in 1862 that paid up to $300 for every enslaved person freed.

www.nytimes.com