LOL. Ah well, there were those that cried about the automobile replacing the horse.
The automobile was a rational and effective replacement for the horse. The EV is neither a rational nor an effective replacement for internal combustion vehicles.
Here is a report by the EPRI, the research arm of the electric power industry who are wetting their panties in anticipation of this boondogle.
http://junksciencecom.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/eprievs.pdf
These guys put the best possible spin on electric vehicles and only managed to debunk the entire line of thinking. What they found:
If and that is a very large
IF 65 million idiots buy electric cars by 2030 the total gasoline savings would be about 7 billion gallons. Last year, however, Americans alone burned about 378 million gallons of gas per day. That means that if they managed to put 65 million of those vehicles on the road, they would only save about 5% of the 2010 gasoline usage in the US alone.
When you consider the growing world demand for gasoline, savings like that are absolutely meaningless.
Then they go on to spin the CO2 reduction IF the can put 65 million of these idiot machines on the road. They claim that if they can get 65 million of them on the road by 2030, they will reduce atmospheric CO2 by 90 million tons a year. 90 million tons. Really? That amounts to about 1.2% of the US "greenhouse gas" emissions and a whopping 0.003% of the current "greenhouse" emissions worldwide. 0.003%. Another meaningless number.
At the current rate of 7,500 dollars each in tax credits, it will only cost 48 billion dollars to achieve nothing. Good thinking greens.