Muslims demand independent Islamic state in Britian

[montelatici]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

Did the native inhabitants authorize their settlement, or was it an invasion that dispossessed the native inhabitants? If the latter it was illegal.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

Did the native inhabitants authorize their settlement, or was it an invasion that dispossessed the native inhabitants? If the latter it was illegal.

Why are we talking about Legal and Illegal when there likely weren't any laws to operate by when the English first settled here?

 

[tinydancer]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

Did the native inhabitants authorize their settlement, or was it an invasion that dispossessed the native inhabitants? If the latter it was illegal.

There was no law at that time. But the website I linked to uses current International law to explain how the settlers were in their rights to claim their property in America.


At this point the following questions might be asked: What about the Indians? Weren't they here first? Didn't we (the white race) take this land away from the Indian? Doesn't the Indian have the rightful title to America?


Since we are dealing with a conflict between two nations or races, the white race and the Indian race, we need to turn to the Law of Nations or International Law for the solution. The following are some basic maxims of the International Law:


FIRST: That every nation possesses an exclusive sovereignty and jurisdiction in its own territory.


SECOND: That no state or nation can by its law directly affect or bind property that lies outside of its own territory, or persons not resident therein.


THIRD: That whatever force the laws of one country have in another depends solely on the municipal laws of the latter.

The first principle listed here would seem to suggest that all of America was the possession of the Indians prior to the age of discovery by the white race.

However, the Indians never laid claim to all of the "territory" of America because they had no understanding of its size and boundaries.

The Indian only claimed the land he was inhabiting and that which he used for hunting, burial, etc. At the time of discovery (circa 1500 A.D.), the American Indian numbered about 700,000 inhabitants, sparsely scattered over what is now America.

Thus the Indians never had a legal claim to much more than 3% of the land at any one time. So it can be said that the Indians did have a legal claim to America, 3% of it, which was considered their "own territory."


In light of this, it cannot be said that the white race violated the second principle of International Law either, since 97% of America was not legally the "property" of anyone.

When America was claimed by the English, French, and Spanish, they claimed the entire breadth and width of the land, from sea to sea, from one boundary to the next. However, the lands that the Indians occupied within these European claims were still Indian land.

It must also be addressed as to whether the white man encroached upon and took possession of lands that were legally claimed by the Indian. T

he third maxim of International Law says we have to look at the Indian's law, and that whatever measures or acts the white man took in regards to Indian land must be pursuant to Indian law. The following are some of the laws that were generally held by the Indians:

1. It was a law common among Indians that the stronger of two tribes or people (nations) has the right to conquer and subdue the weaker.


2. Under Indian common law it was understood that land claims existed by inhabiting the land and by any use of the land.

3. When any land was unoccupied or not used for one year, the land was free for anyone to claim and settle.


This first law of the Indian could actually render all other arguments of land rights academic. This law was almost a way of life with the Indian, which is why they were always warring among themselves. The wars and conflicts between the white race and the Indian race throughout history were numerous, and the fact that the white race was the stronger cannot be doubted."

Did the White Man Steal North America from the Indians?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Reality check: You can toss in the perjorative label "apologist" but that doesn't change the reality.

Is there a better word to describe you folks who support this Islamization of Europe like you do?

Somehow,, the notion of celebrating diversity does not extend to that of all the diverse European cultures now being colonized by the many millions of those who want their own knuckle-dragging culture to replace European .

 

[tinydancer]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

they stole a peopled continent----no one invited them

Native Americans were immigrants as well. No one had a deed to all of North America. Many territories by the way were purchased.

really----other than the island of manhattan which went for a WHOPPING handful of glass beads-------who paid the Indians for what?

That story is complete bullshit. Here's what really happened with the Dutch. And don't forget there's no such entity as a real estate agent. Very little cash ever changed hands. Most deals were made on a barter system of trading.

"Of course, the biggest problem with the Manhattan purchase isn’t the price: It’s the identity of the sellers.

The Dutch conducted their business with the Canarsee tribe who were actually based out of what is now Brooklyn. However, we should be fair to perpetrators of the glass beads myth: The Canarsee probably would have taken anything in exchange for the use of Manhattan, as the island actually belonged to the Wappinger Confederacy, another group of Native Americans.

As a result, the Dutch claim to Manhattan was later contested, and the Dutch compensated the rightful owners. Thus, the Dutch settlers actually paid for Manhattan twice."

Native Americans Didn’t Sell Manhattan For $24 Of Beads

 

[GHook93]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing of Britain. They now demand an independent state, for Muslims only, to be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologists will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this.

Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%. In only 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger the percentage they achieve the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

While THIS is pretty disturbing ---- (from your OP)

A leading figure behind Muslims Against the Crusades is Anjem Choudary, a notorious Sharia court judge based in London who believes in the primacy of Islam over all other faiths, and who has long campaigned for Islamic law to be implemented in all of Britain.

Choudary is a former spokesman for Islam4UK, which was "established by sincere Muslims as a platform to propagate the supreme Islamic ideology within the United Kingdom as a divine alternative to man-made law," and to "convince the British public about the superiority of Islam [...] thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power [...] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharia in Britain."

My bet is the entire membership could meet in one of these.

Besides -- article admits that Britain had sanctioned their predecessor org.
The DO need to further license or monitor "religious courts" to head this stuff off at the pass.

Because this is brain child of an existing Shariah Court judge. You think he RESPECTS the limits of the type of cases and verdicts that he hands down? No way. He already runs a "parallel justice system"..

Sums you up.

 

[flacaltenn]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing of Britain. They now demand an independent state, for Muslims only, to be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologists will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this.

Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%. In only 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger the percentage they achieve the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

While THIS is pretty disturbing ---- (from your OP)

A leading figure behind Muslims Against the Crusades is Anjem Choudary, a notorious Sharia court judge based in London who believes in the primacy of Islam over all other faiths, and who has long campaigned for Islamic law to be implemented in all of Britain.

Choudary is a former spokesman for Islam4UK, which was "established by sincere Muslims as a platform to propagate the supreme Islamic ideology within the United Kingdom as a divine alternative to man-made law," and to "convince the British public about the superiority of Islam [...] thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power [...] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharia in Britain."

My bet is the entire membership could meet in one of these.

Besides -- article admits that Britain had sanctioned their predecessor org.
The DO need to further license or monitor "religious courts" to head this stuff off at the pass.

Because this is brain child of an existing Shariah Court judge. You think he RESPECTS the limits of the type of cases and verdicts that he hands down? No way. He already runs a "parallel justice system"..

Sums you up.

View attachment 77656

Not at all GHook. Unless you're a Euro.. It's really simple. It ain't Islam -- it's the cultures they came out of.

So --- Highly scrutinize ANY immigration from theocratic tryannical places that are still in the 17th century. And don't ACCOMMODATE those practices and govt support that they had in the Old Country,..

Voila --- you don't have to soil your American pants over this.. They'll be PLENTY of soiled knickers in Euro -- but they are unreachable leftists and can't help trying to make everyone comfortable and protected.

 

[flacaltenn]

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

they stole a peopled continent----no one invited them

Native Americans were immigrants as well. No one had a deed to all of North America. Many territories by the way were purchased.

really----other than the island of manhattan which went for a WHOPPING handful of glass beads-------who paid the Indians for what?

That story is complete bullshit. Here's what really happened with the Dutch. And don't forget there's no such entity as a real estate agent. Very little cash ever changed hands. Most deals were made on a barter system of trading.

"Of course, the biggest problem with the Manhattan purchase isn’t the price: It’s the identity of the sellers.

The Dutch conducted their business with the Canarsee tribe who were actually based out of what is now Brooklyn. However, we should be fair to perpetrators of the glass beads myth: The Canarsee probably would have taken anything in exchange for the use of Manhattan, as the island actually belonged to the Wappinger Confederacy, another group of Native Americans.

As a result, the Dutch claim to Manhattan was later contested, and the Dutch compensated the rightful owners. Thus, the Dutch settlers actually paid for Manhattan twice."

Native Americans Didn’t Sell Manhattan For $24 Of Beads

OK so it $48 and a bunch of blankets ??

 

[tinydancer]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

Did the native inhabitants authorize their settlement, or was it an invasion that dispossessed the native inhabitants? If the latter it was illegal.

Why are we talking about Legal and Illegal when there likely weren't any laws to operate by when the English first settled here?

And it's the Dutch, French and Spanish as well that took over what they considered the New World. Yet everyone always wants to take a whack at the English.

 

[tinydancer]

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

they stole a peopled continent----no one invited them

Native Americans were immigrants as well. No one had a deed to all of North America. Many territories by the way were purchased.

really----other than the island of manhattan which went for a WHOPPING handful of glass beads-------who paid the Indians for what?

That story is complete bullshit. Here's what really happened with the Dutch. And don't forget there's no such entity as a real estate agent. Very little cash ever changed hands. Most deals were made on a barter system of trading.

"Of course, the biggest problem with the Manhattan purchase isn’t the price: It’s the identity of the sellers.

The Dutch conducted their business with the Canarsee tribe who were actually based out of what is now Brooklyn. However, we should be fair to perpetrators of the glass beads myth: The Canarsee probably would have taken anything in exchange for the use of Manhattan, as the island actually belonged to the Wappinger Confederacy, another group of Native Americans.

As a result, the Dutch claim to Manhattan was later contested, and the Dutch compensated the rightful owners. Thus, the Dutch settlers actually paid for Manhattan twice."

Native Americans Didn’t Sell Manhattan For $24 Of Beads

OK so it $48 and a bunch of blankets ??

What did you want them to pay? It was just forest. Current day prices? Crap we're talking the 1500 and 1600's for crying out loud.

ETA: I'm very pro First Nations btw. It was a wild land back then. And for the most part when one understands true history and no political slants on it in many cases the settlers and the First Nations worked quite well together.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

And it's the Dutch, French and Spanish as well that took over what they considered the New World. Yet everyone always wants to take a whack at the English.

The left more easily achieve supremacy when Americans are turned against each other, so they have a sort of sick fascination with trying to make make 'minorities' out to be victims.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

OK so it $48 and a bunch of blankets ??

Is it somehow your job to look into the past and tell us what the value of the land was to people you never met? For some reason, I feel like, if we were to look at the land through their eyes, we'd also see what was paid was the value of the land to them.

 

[tinydancer]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing of Britain. They now demand an independent state, for Muslims only, to be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologists will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this.

Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%. In only 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger the percentage they achieve the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

While THIS is pretty disturbing ---- (from your OP)

A leading figure behind Muslims Against the Crusades is Anjem Choudary, a notorious Sharia court judge based in London who believes in the primacy of Islam over all other faiths, and who has long campaigned for Islamic law to be implemented in all of Britain.

Choudary is a former spokesman for Islam4UK, which was "established by sincere Muslims as a platform to propagate the supreme Islamic ideology within the United Kingdom as a divine alternative to man-made law," and to "convince the British public about the superiority of Islam [...] thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power [...] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharia in Britain."

My bet is the entire membership could meet in one of these.

Besides -- article admits that Britain had sanctioned their predecessor org.
The DO need to further license or monitor "religious courts" to head this stuff off at the pass.

Because this is brain child of an existing Shariah Court judge. You think he RESPECTS the limits of the type of cases and verdicts that he hands down? No way. He already runs a "parallel justice system"..

Sums you up.

View attachment 77656

Not at all GHook. Unless you're a Euro.. It's really simple. It ain't Islam -- it's the cultures they came out of.

So --- Highly scrutinize ANY immigration from theocratic tryannical places that are still in the 17th century. And don't ACCOMMODATE those practices and govt support that they had in the Old Country,..

Voila --- you don't have to soil your American pants over this.. They'll be PLENTY of soiled knickers in Euro -- but they are unreachable leftists and can't help trying to make everyone comfortable and protected.

I'm glad you made this post because it made me fill out my migrant camp burned out in Dusseldorf thread. The bloody idiots have just thrown "Muslims" together not realizing that many of the countries have been at each others throats for centuries. Oh and with Iranian guards.

Special. Didn't work out.

 

[flacaltenn]

they stole a peopled continent----no one invited them

Native Americans were immigrants as well. No one had a deed to all of North America. Many territories by the way were purchased.

really----other than the island of manhattan which went for a WHOPPING handful of glass beads-------who paid the Indians for what?

That story is complete bullshit. Here's what really happened with the Dutch. And don't forget there's no such entity as a real estate agent. Very little cash ever changed hands. Most deals were made on a barter system of trading.

"Of course, the biggest problem with the Manhattan purchase isn’t the price: It’s the identity of the sellers.

The Dutch conducted their business with the Canarsee tribe who were actually based out of what is now Brooklyn. However, we should be fair to perpetrators of the glass beads myth: The Canarsee probably would have taken anything in exchange for the use of Manhattan, as the island actually belonged to the Wappinger Confederacy, another group of Native Americans.

As a result, the Dutch claim to Manhattan was later contested, and the Dutch compensated the rightful owners. Thus, the Dutch settlers actually paid for Manhattan twice."

Native Americans Didn’t Sell Manhattan For $24 Of Beads

OK so it $48 and a bunch of blankets ??

What did you want them to pay? It was just forest. Current day prices? Crap we're talking the 1500 and 1600's for crying out loud.

ETA: I'm very pro First Nations btw. It was a wild land back then. And for the most part when one understands true history and no political slants on it in many cases the settlers and the First Nations worked quite well together.

Location, Location, Location.. That's why so many tribes were there.. Fishing, protected by water, and subways...

 

[flacaltenn]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing of Britain. They now demand an independent state, for Muslims only, to be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologists will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this.

Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%. In only 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger the percentage they achieve the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

While THIS is pretty disturbing ---- (from your OP)

A leading figure behind Muslims Against the Crusades is Anjem Choudary, a notorious Sharia court judge based in London who believes in the primacy of Islam over all other faiths, and who has long campaigned for Islamic law to be implemented in all of Britain.

Choudary is a former spokesman for Islam4UK, which was "established by sincere Muslims as a platform to propagate the supreme Islamic ideology within the United Kingdom as a divine alternative to man-made law," and to "convince the British public about the superiority of Islam [...] thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power [...] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharia in Britain."

My bet is the entire membership could meet in one of these.

Besides -- article admits that Britain had sanctioned their predecessor org.
The DO need to further license or monitor "religious courts" to head this stuff off at the pass.

Because this is brain child of an existing Shariah Court judge. You think he RESPECTS the limits of the type of cases and verdicts that he hands down? No way. He already runs a "parallel justice system"..

Sums you up.

View attachment 77656

Not at all GHook. Unless you're a Euro.. It's really simple. It ain't Islam -- it's the cultures they came out of.

So --- Highly scrutinize ANY immigration from theocratic tryannical places that are still in the 17th century. And don't ACCOMMODATE those practices and govt support that they had in the Old Country,..

Voila --- you don't have to soil your American pants over this.. They'll be PLENTY of soiled knickers in Euro -- but they are unreachable leftists and can't help trying to make everyone comfortable and protected.

I'm glad you made this post because it made me fill out my migrant camp burned out in Dusseldorf thread. The bloody idiots have just thrown "Muslims" together not realizing that many of the countries have been at each others throats for centuries. Oh and with Iranian guards.

Special. Didn't work out.

You have a Muslims burn down Dusseldorf camp too ?? Copycat...

 

[flacaltenn]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing of Britain. They now demand an independent state, for Muslims only, to be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologists will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this.

Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%. In only 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger the percentage they achieve the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

While THIS is pretty disturbing ---- (from your OP)

A leading figure behind Muslims Against the Crusades is Anjem Choudary, a notorious Sharia court judge based in London who believes in the primacy of Islam over all other faiths, and who has long campaigned for Islamic law to be implemented in all of Britain.

Choudary is a former spokesman for Islam4UK, which was "established by sincere Muslims as a platform to propagate the supreme Islamic ideology within the United Kingdom as a divine alternative to man-made law," and to "convince the British public about the superiority of Islam [...] thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power [...] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharia in Britain."

My bet is the entire membership could meet in one of these.

Besides -- article admits that Britain had sanctioned their predecessor org.
The DO need to further license or monitor "religious courts" to head this stuff off at the pass.

Because this is brain child of an existing Shariah Court judge. You think he RESPECTS the limits of the type of cases and verdicts that he hands down? No way. He already runs a "parallel justice system"..

Sums you up.

View attachment 77656

Not at all GHook. Unless you're a Euro.. It's really simple. It ain't Islam -- it's the cultures they came out of.

So --- Highly scrutinize ANY immigration from theocratic tryannical places that are still in the 17th century. And don't ACCOMMODATE those practices and govt support that they had in the Old Country,..

Voila --- you don't have to soil your American pants over this.. They'll be PLENTY of soiled knickers in Euro -- but they are unreachable leftists and can't help trying to make everyone comfortable and protected.

I'm glad you made this post because it made me fill out my migrant camp burned out in Dusseldorf thread. The bloody idiots have just thrown "Muslims" together not realizing that many of the countries have been at each others throats for centuries. Oh and with Iranian guards.

Special. Didn't work out.

Governments should NEVER be in the business of warehousing people. Not in a Western society. But look around. We are warehousing about 25,000 of those Cen. Amer. kids who rode the death trains up here after Some Nidget (in his last year of office) suggested that we would fast track young illegals into Americans.

There's your result of "ACCOMMODATION" in the USA....

 

[irosie91]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

they stole a peopled continent----no one invited them

Great article here for you to understand the truth of what really happened in the beginning and not the propaganda bullshit we get today. And btw I am very pro First Nations but with reality at my side.

"In spite of the legal right the white race has to America, we often are confronted with the anti-American propaganda that the white race wronged the Indian by attacking and killing them and driving them out of their land. We thus need to look at the first conflicts that existed between the Indians and the colonial settlers. A summary of these first conflicts shows they were always initiated by Indians:6

• • Shortly after the first colony was established at Jamestown in 1607, the settlers were attacked by the Indians, who wounded seventeen men and killed one boy.

• After the above conflict, peaceful relations prevailed, due to the wise policy of Captain John Smith and the good will of Powhatan, head chief of the Indian Confederacy. When Powhatan died in 1618, his brother Opechancanough, who disliked the English, began to plot war. In March 1622, the Indian tribes went on the warpath, and swept through a line of settlements marked by a trail of blood. In the white settlements, nearly 400 men, women, and children, were cruelly put to death before the ravages of the Indians could be checked.

• For 22 years after the massacre of 1622 there was peace. But Opechancanouch, at last head chief, only waited for another opportunity. In 1644, there was a civil war in England, and he thought the expected moment was at hand. The massacre he waged left over 300 white settlers slain in two days. Again the whites took up arms in defense, and in 1646 the aged chief himself was taken and killed - there was never again a general uprising in Virginia.

• In the Plymouth colony, a peace compact was established between the Indian chief Massasoit and Governor Carver. As time went on, the friendly old chief died. When his son, King Philip, came to be ruler of the Wampanoag tribe, trouble began to brew for the colonists. Urged on by his braves, King Philip began sending messages to friendly tribes, inviting them to join in a mighty war on the "pale faces." The war that followed was a terrible one. The Indians, avoiding the white troops, dodging them, and never meeting them face to face in the open field, carried on the contest in their savage way of massacring the helpless, and burning villages. Many a fair and quite settlement was made desolate. Women and children were ruthlessly murdered, and burned in the houses. But by the end of 1675 the force of the Indians was broken.
  
  
  
• In the New Haven colony the situation with the Indians (the Pequets) was similar. At first there were peaceful relationships between them and the white settlers. During 1637, the Pequots attempted to organize a confederacy, but unable to secure the help of the Narragansetts due to the influence of Roger Williams, they took to the warpath alone. T
• 
  
• hey did not come out in open battle, but waylaid a party of whites and killed thirty of them. In response to this, a small party of English, along with some seventy friendly Indians, attacked the Pequet stronghold, killing over 450 of that tribe.
  
• 
  
• The great Pequet tribe was crushed, and nearly forty years of Peace ensued.
  History reveals that all the early hostilities and wars between the American Indians and the white settlers, were instigated or started by the Indians without just cause.
• 
  
• Even though the white settlers had legal title to the land by way of purchase or claim of unoccupied lands, the Indian was always the one to disrupt peaceful relations with attacks, massacres, and wars. The retaliation by the white settlers were merely acts of self defense and self preservation in accordance with the law of nature.
• 
  
• Thus it was the Indian who was the intruder and violator of land rights and of his own law. It was the Indian who, in the beginning, wronged the white man. The Indian's treachery, barbaric and warlike manner, and sneak attacks on the colonists was positive proof of the anti-social nature of the red man. This exhibit of the Indian's character caused much distrust of the Indian, and became the "code of conduct" which the Indian continued to live by and uphold in the future.
  
  
  Thus, the white race has a rightful and legal claim and title to America pursuant to international law, the Indian's law, the law of nature, and by a combination thereof."

Did the White Man Steal North America from the Indians?

not all that impressed-----that you resort to the term RIGHTS OF THE WHITE MAN----is kinda disgusting. I am not entirely in agreement with the "EUROPEANS STOLE THE LAND FROM THE INDIANS" crowd---but unlike you----I do not dance on the dead bodies of the primitives who lived on the continent before the "UBER ALLES WHITE MAN" that you worship got here.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing of Britain. They now demand an independent state, for Muslims only, to be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologists will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this.

Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%. In only 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger the percentage they achieve the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Half of those 5% don't ever go to mosques.

If Britain stays away from another Iraq, the number of Muslims who sympathize with extremists will go down.

 

[irosie91]

Britain's "Islamic Emirates Project"

So it begins. Muslims now make up 5% and growing if Britain. They now demand an independent state for Muslims only be craved out of Britain.

The Muzzie apologist will say it's a fringe group, but the vast majority of Muslims in Britain desire this. Only a decade ago they made up less than 1%, I 10 years they became 5%, by 2030 they are projected to make up 20%! The larger a percent they become the more demands they will make!

Britain (Europe and America) be warned!

Well, that was certainly the case with caucasions once they illegally came into the North American continent, then they just took and murdered their way into the whole thing.

Explain how they illegally came to the NA continent.

Did the native inhabitants authorize their settlement, or was it an invasion that dispossessed the native inhabitants? If the latter it was illegal.

why do you insist upon displaying your extreme ignorance. North America---at the time of the arrival of Europeans harbored people who were thinly scattered in the land---and had no concept of "LAND OWNERSHIP". One cannot "DISPOSSESS" people who do not own land and have no borders----they were---essentially, nomads on a very vast land mass.

 

[frigidweirdo]

GHook's right. You give these people an inch and they'll take a yard. Great swarthes of London, once the capital of the greatest empire known to man, now resemble Afghan villages.

Which was the government's fault (both Tory and Labour) for letting them in.