Muslims are ANGRY at Texas Mayor After She Stops “Sharia Court”

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Creeping Sharia.
Today it's a voluntary system, with these people tomorrow it's likely to go further.
Best to kill the cancer while they still can. Shame on the four assholes who voted against stopping it.

lol. you just can't help yourself, can you? when you have to make things up to support your position there's a good chance you don't have a leg to stand on.

the mayor and the five idiots that voted to pass a completely unenforceable ordinance are idiots and should be ridiculed and shamed publicly.

The Mayor passed a thoroughly enforceable law... precluding the means of Islamic interests to act as a court of law... or to be recognized as a court of law.

People can go into whatever venue they like and subject themselves to the authority of whoever they want... as long as within the framework of whatever that is, they do not subject themselves to any agreement which rests outside of the legal code of their locality, their state or federal authority.

For instance... the Sharia hearing cannot represent itself as a court. If it does so, it is breaking the law.

The Sharia hearing cannot pass judgement on ANY CRIME... as to do so subjects them to criminal statutes regarding the duty of the citizen to report criminal behavior, or where such is NOT a function to statute, there is NO WHERE in the United States which provides for anyone to overtly conceal a crime, as to do so one becomes complicit in that crime.

Therefore where the Sharia hearing is hearing evidence of a crime, and fails to report such, they are acting to conceal it. Works out the same, but there is the distinction.

Further, the cackling which holds that such is merely a civil forum are foolish in the extreme, as such would-be forums will morph into greater perceived authority as they grow their constituency.

Which is why the US should ban Islam, entirely... and IMMEDIATELY.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Without means of enforcement such arbitration is pointless.

Judge Judy is legally binding if the participants agree that it is beforehand.

Judith Sheindlin is a real judge in a real court of law.

 

[ogibillm]

Creeping Sharia.
Today it's a voluntary system, with these people tomorrow it's likely to go further.
Best to kill the cancer while they still can. Shame on the four assholes who voted against stopping it.

lol. you just can't help yourself, can you? when you have to make things up to support your position there's a good chance you don't have a leg to stand on.

the mayor and the five idiots that voted to pass a completely unenforceable ordinance are idiots and should be ridiculed and shamed publicly.

The Mayor passed a thoroughly enforceable law... precluding the means of Islamic interests to act as a court of law... or to be recognized as a court of law.

People can go into whatever venue they like and subject themselves to the authority of whoever they want... as long as within the framework of whatever that is, they do not subject themselves to any agreement which rests outside of the legal code of their locality, their state or federal authority.

For instance... the Sharia hearing cannot represent itself as a court. If it does so, it is breaking the law.

The Sharia hearing cannot pass judgement on ANY CRIME... as to do so subjects them to criminal statutes regarding the duty of the citizen to report criminal behavior, or where such is NOT a function to statute, there is NO WHERE in the United States which provides for anyone to overtly conceal a crime, as to do so one becomes complicit in that crime.

Therefore where the Sharia hearing is hearing evidence of a crime, and fails to report such, they are acting to conceal it. Works out the same, but there is the distinction.

Further, the cackling which holds that such is merely a civil forum are foolish in the extreme, as such would-be forums will morph into greater perceived authority as they grow their constituency.

Which is why the US should ban Islam, entirely... and IMMEDIATELY.

you get to ignoring the constitution pretty quickly.

so you do agree though that the mayor and the council have no authority or ability to end the arbitration, correct?

 

[ogibillm]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Without means of enforcement such arbitration is pointless.

Judge Judy is legally binding if the participants agree that it is beforehand.

Judith Sheindlin is a real judge in a real court of law.

you don't really think her show is an actual court proceeding, do you?

 

[rightwinger]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

Good point

If the Muslim courts break our laws, the local justice system can step in

But if a married couple agrees to go to a muslim court to resolve their differences there is little a grandstanding mayor can do

 

[rightwinger]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Without means of enforcement such arbitration is pointless.

Judge Judy is legally binding if the participants agree that it is beforehand.

Judith Sheindlin is a real judge in a real court of law.

The cases are real. The people are real. The rulings are final

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

you get to ignoring the constitution pretty quickly.

Not at all... I simply exclude Islam from any sense of 'religion'.

so you do agree though that the mayor and the council have no authority or ability to end the arbitration, correct?

They have every authority to end Arbitration. As the arbitrating body is a known cultural virus, which has for 1200 years fomented mass-murder as a means to acquire political power, it does so through posing as a Religion and should be outright banned.

Understand that EVERY organization has the right to arbitrate within the scope of its entity.

And as with ANY RIGHT... such come from the bearing of the responsibilities that sustain those rights. Islam... ON THE WHOLE.. has forfeited that right.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

Good point

If the Muslim courts break our laws, the local justice system can step in

But if a married couple agrees to go to a muslim court to resolve their differences there is little a grandstanding mayor can do

Yeah, if the court directs the man to take his wife home and beat her, you'd be all for it.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

Good point

If the Muslim courts break our laws, the local justice system can step in

But if a married couple agrees to go to a muslim court to resolve their differences there is little a grandstanding mayor can do

To get a divorce the final decree must be signed by a judge or it's not legal.

 

[Asclepias]

Pretty damn sad that it wasn't a 9-0 vote.

They should make the ones that voted against it do 500 hail marys and donate $50 to the churches coffers.

 

[ogibillm]

Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament prescribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Yeah, if the court directs the man to take his wife home and beat her, you'd be all for it.

Of course he does... .

 

[ogibillm]

you get to ignoring the constitution pretty quickly.

Not at all... I simply exclude Islam from any sense of 'religion'.

so you do agree though that the mayor and the council have no authority or ability to end the arbitration, correct?

They have every authority to end Arbitration. As the arbitrating body is a known cultural virus, which has for 1200 years fomented mass-murder as a means to acquire political power, it does so through posing as a Religion and should be outright banned.

Understand that EVERY organization has the right to arbitrate within the scope of its entity.

And as with ANY RIGHT... such come from the bearing of the responsibilities that sustain those rights. Islam... ON THE WHOLE.. has forfeited that right.

wow. you really are mayor of crazyland.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

A LASH... is A FELONY.

Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

wow. you really are mayor of crazyland.

ROFLMNAO!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Asclepias]

Now I wonder how the mayor is going to enforce this?

 

[ogibillm]

100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

A LASH... is A FELONY.

Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.

so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

... is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. ...

"Proscribed", past tense. Those were laws for a people that existed several thousand years ago. What is it about context that confuses you idiots?

 

[Asclepias]

100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

A LASH... is A FELONY.

Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.

so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?

This is going to put a cramp in the Amish legal system as well.