Muscovite-Ukrainian WAR, regular updates I VIDEO , PICTURES, STATISTIC I Big Muscovite Losses Near Vuhledar/Shevchenko -- Over 20 Vehicles Destroyed

You mean it should have laid down and let you rape it again after raping Crimea away?
More or less, yes. It will be the end of Kievan regime, it, might become the end of NATO expansion, but many Ukrainian people will be saved, and their right to speak their language or be members of their church will be guaranteed. (And, what should be more important for you - Russia won't nuke American bases and cities).
 
Last edited:
Riiiight. Nice way to justify naked unprovoked aggression. Hitler made similar comments when he invaded the Sudetenland and Poland.
 
Turd worlders and Anti Colonialist Marxists are loving it how White folks are killin each other in an all out war
As if "right boys" consider Russians and Ukrainians as "white folks".
 
Riiiight. Nice way to justify naked unprovoked aggression.
It wasn't "unprovoked". It was self-defense.

Hitler made similar comments when he invaded the Sudetenland and Poland.
And Americans made similar comments when they attacked Mexico or Vietnam, or supported Ukrainian Nazies. Collective self-defense is one of the oldest and reliable justifications.
 
It wasn't "unprovoked". It was self-defense.


And Americans made similar comments when they attacked Mexico or Vietnam, or supported Ukrainian Nazies. Collective self-defense is one of the oldest and reliable justifications.
Nope, the US never attacked Vietnam, it worked with SEATO and the legal government of South Vietnam to repel a Russian led, trained and funded invasion by communist North Vietnam. We are currently helping fund the legitimate, freely elected government of Ukraine along with most of the First World in repelling an illegal and unprovoked invasion by an openly and arrogantly expansionist Russia. Mexico was a border war with a country that was actually more powerful than the USA.
 
Nope, the US never attacked Vietnam, it worked with SEATO and the legal government of South Vietnam to repel a Russian led, trained and funded invasion by communist North Vietnam.
Yep. I watched "Green Berets" (1968) either.


Thats exactly what I mean. Absolutely the same way Russia worked with legal governments of Donetsk and Lugansk People Republics to repel NATO led, trained and funded invasion by Nazi Kievan regime.

The main difference is that ordinary Americans didn't see much difference between North and South Vietnamese (or between Tajiks and Pushtuns in Afghanistan) and the Russians do see the difference between Russians, Poles and Germans.

We are currently helping fund the legitimate, freely elected government of Ukraine
It never was legitimate, and its expired anyway. There is no legitimate government in Ukraine.

along with most of the First World in repelling an illegal and unprovoked invasion by an openly and arrogantly expansionist Russia.
No. Along with European Nazies you going in their genocidal and expansionist Drüng nach Osten. And as all other previous attempts it will fail.

Mexico was a border war with a country that was actually more powerful than the USA.
Mexico wasn't actually more powerful than the USA.
 
Last edited:
Yep. I watched "Green Berets" (1968) either.


Thats exactly what I mean. Absolutely the same way Russia worked with legal governments of Donetsk and Lugansk People Republics to repel NATO led, trained and funded invasion by Nazi Kievan regime.

The main difference is that ordinary Americans didn't see much difference between North and South Vietnamese (or between Tajiks and Pushtuns in Afghanistan) and the Russians do see the difference between Russians, Poles and Germans.


It never was legitimate, and its expired anyway. There is no legitimate government in Ukraine.


No. Along with European Nazies you going in their genocidal and expansionist Drüng nach Osten. And as all other previous attempts it will fail.


Mexico wasn't actually more powerful than the USA.

Donetsk and Lugansk were and are part of Ukraine. Like it did with the Russian stooges in the Viet Cong, Russia infiltrated troops mascarading as civilians to destabilize those oblasts as a pretext to invade and conquer them. As for the Green Berets, I served during the Vietnam war and the majority of what was shown in the movie was reasonably (for Hollywood) based upon truth.
The world doesn’t see any real difference between Argentina and Chile either, does that give one the right to invade the other, how about Norway and Denmark or Sweden? All you can do is spout propaganda, lies and at best tenth-truths to justify your genocide against the civilian population of Ukraine and your illegal invasion and occupation of its territory. You’re obviously paid for more than a full time job at attempting to spread Putin’s propaganda Sonia don’t know why I even waste my time replying to your lies.
 
Yep. I watched "Green Berets" (1968) either.


Thats exactly what I mean. Absolutely the same way Russia worked with legal governments of Donetsk and Lugansk People Republics to repel NATO led, trained and funded invasion by Nazi Kievan regime.

The main difference is that ordinary Americans didn't see much difference between North and South Vietnamese (or between Tajiks and Pushtuns in Afghanistan) and the Russians do see the difference between Russians, Poles and Germans.


It never was legitimate, and its expired anyway. There is no legitimate government in Ukraine.


No. Along with European Nazies you going in their genocidal and expansionist Drüng nach Osten. And as all other previous attempts it will fail.


Mexico wasn't actually more powerful than the USA.

In 1847 it was, or at least equally powerful. The US had a tiny army ,no navy to speak of and no military heritage. The reason the US won the Mexican-American War was that the USA was far less corrupt than Mexico. Even after winning the war decisively the USA paid Mexico above market rate for the territory it absorbed. What did Russia pay Ukraine for Crimea or Georgia for South Ossetia? The answer was not one Ruble, I would normally say not one cent, but the Ruble is worth far less than one cent. You can’t come up with any sane or legal excuse for Russias actions over the last two decades, so you lie and obfuscate in the vain hope of convincing even one person on a meaningless Internet forum and you have failed miserably at even that.
 
Donetsk and Lugansk were and are part of Ukraine.
And Kosovo was and still is (from the world's majority POV) a part of Serbia. When you declare "Serbia for [ethnic] Serbs", or "Georgia for [ethnic] Georgians", or "America for [white, anglo-saxon, protestant] Americans" or "Ukraine for [ethnic] Ukrainians" you are going to face the challenge from Albanians, Ossetians, Afroamericans, or Russians.


Like it did with the Russian stooges in the Viet Cong, Russia infiltrated troops mascarading as civilians to destabilize those oblasts as a pretext to invade and conquer them.
Man, Russians are not dark magicians, who can force millions of people do something (especially do something dangerous) against their will.

As for the Green Berets, I served during the Vietnam war and the majority of what was shown in the movie was reasonably (for Hollywood) based upon truth.
Yes. The only movie about Vietnam war, made during this war.

The world doesn’t see any real difference between Argentina and Chile either, does that give one the right to invade the other, how about Norway and Denmark or Sweden?
It depends. If I don't see the real difference between, say, Norway and Denmark, my personal motivation to fight and die for one of the sides will be minimal. May be even smaller than American motivation to fight for Southern Vietnamese or Northern Afghanies.


All you can do is spout propaganda, lies and at best tenth-truths to justify your genocide against the civilian population of Ukraine and your illegal invasion and occupation of its territory.
As I said, its not about territory and never have been.
 
When you declare America For Americans the Anti Colonialist Marxists flood America with Brown Dwarfs and Turd Worlder Criminals
 
White folks
the Muscovites are not Whites , they are the Mongoloids , dont you know it ?

"Let us begin with this evident fact: Muscovy does not belong at all to Europe, but to Asia. It follows that judging Muscovy and the Muscovites by our European standards is a mistake to be avoided."—gonzague de reynold, 19501

In methodological terms, one should de-Europeanise any analysis of Muscovy policy.— thomas gomart, 20062 "

my recommendation to you :
"Tsarev 🇷🇺 ulus"
Tsarev ulus : Russia in the Golden Horde - Persee



DhfsRJXVQAAMZeX.jpg
 
And Kosovo was and still is (from the world's majority POV) a part of Serbia. When you declare "Serbia for [ethnic] Serbs", or "Georgia for [ethnic] Georgians", or "America for [white, anglo-saxon, protestant] Americans" or "Ukraine for [ethnic] Ukrainians" you are going to face the challenge from Albanians, Ossetians, Afroamericans, or Russians.



Man, Russians are not dark magicians, who can force millions of people do something (especially do something dangerous) against their will.


Yes. The only movie about Vietnam war, made during this war.


It depends. If I don't see the real difference between, say, Norway and Denmark, my personal motivation to fight and die for one of the sides will be minimal. May be even smaller than American motivation to fight for Southern Vietnamese or Northern Afghanies.



As I said, its not about territory and never have been.
If it's not about territory why did Russia keep South Ossetia, Crimea and the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhya Oblasts? It's all about territory regardless of your lies.
 
15th post
If it's not about territory why did Russia keep South Ossetia, Crimea and the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhya Oblasts? It's all about territory regardless of your lies.
Because it is about human lifes, their safety, dignity and wealth. We protect our people, and, sometimes, the only way to protect people is to rejoin or control the territory. I mean people in US-controlled Texas are safer and richer than in Mexico-controlled Chihuahua.
And, of course, war must be profitable.
We were forced to fight because of NATO expansion, discrimination and genocide of Russian people, not just because we like territories and money. But to pay for our expenses, among other things, we take territories. Everything has a price.
And the price of Kievan (and Western) unwillingless to accept our rather modest and reasonable demands (don't kill us, don't make preparations to kill us) is not only death and destruction, but, also, the lost territories.
 
Last edited:
Because it is about human lifes, their safety, dignity and wealth. We protect our people, and, sometimes, the only way to protect people is to rejoin or control the territory. I mean people in US-controlled Texas are safer and richer than in Mexico-controlled Chihuahua.
And, of course, war must be profitable.
We were forced to fight because of NATO expansion, discrimination and genocide of Russian people, not just because we like territories and money. But to pay for our expenses, among other things, we take territories. Everything has a price.
And the price of Kievan (and Western) unwillingless to accept our rather modest and reasonable demands (don't kill us, don't make preparations to kill us) is not only death and destruction, but, also, the lost territories.
Protect them by murdering them and conquering them. Russia under Putin behaves the same way the USSR did under Stalin. NATO hasn't conquered ANY countries. Every Eastern European nation, ex Warsaw Pact or Soviet Republic, has begged to join NATO for protection from unprovoked RUSSIAN aggression.
 
Protect them by murdering them and conquering them.
Yep. "Better dead than red". It is much better for some of them to die now, than become a NATO soldier. But, first of all, we protect ourselves. NATO expansion is a vital threat to Russian Federation itself.

Russia under Putin behaves the same way the USSR did under Stalin.
And the same way the Russian Empire did under Romanovs, and the Great Duchy of Moscow did under Rurikovichs, or any other country did in the same circumstances. We are human beings as everyone else. When we are under attack we fight back.
NATO hasn't conquered ANY countries.
Really? What about Kosovo?

Every Eastern European nation, ex Warsaw Pact or Soviet Republic, has begged to join NATO for protection from unprovoked RUSSIAN aggression.
Bla-bla-bla. As well as the Southern Vietnamese begged you to protect them from those evil Northern Vietnamese, right?
It's nothing but empty rhetoric of corrupted leadership. You pay them, and then they "beg you" for paying them more (whatever it means for their people). Their leaders just sell "their" people as cannon fodder because they don't need them, and "your" government buy this cannon fodder just to steal your money even if they don't need to achieve victory in the war (especially if they can't achieve victory in the war). It's "lose-lose" deal for people of both countries, and it's "win-win" for corrupted leadership of them.
 
Last edited:
Yep. "Better dead than red". It is much better for some of them to die now, than become a NATO soldier. But, first of all, we protect ourselves. NATO expansion is a vital threat to Russian Federation itself.


And the same way the Russian Empire did under Romanovs, and the Great Duchy of Moscow did under Rurikovichs, or any other country did in the same circumstances. We are human beings as everyone else. When we are under attack we fight back.

Really? What about Kosovo?


Bla-bla-bla. As well as the Southern Vietnamese begged you to protect them from those evil Northern Vietnamese, right?
It's nothing but empty rhetoric of corrupted leadership. You pay them, and then they "beg you" for paying them more (whatever it means for their people). Their leaders just sell "their" people as cannon fodder because they don't need them, and "your" government buy this cannon fodder just to steal your money even if they don't need to achieve victory in the war (especially if they can't achieve victory in the war). It's "lose-lose" deal for people of both countries, and it's "win-win" for corrupted leadership of them.
Well, I've wasted enough time on you, so I am going to do what everyone else is doing and put you on ignore. I used to think you were just misinformed, but now I have come to the conclusion that you are a paid propagandist. There is no other way you could spend so much time here at such hours.
 
Back
Top Bottom