- Banned
- #261
Any candidate for the Dems/ Socialists would have to be pre approved by AOC, Schumer and Pelosi.Liberals have been indoctrinated that anything white is racist and anything black is a victim
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any candidate for the Dems/ Socialists would have to be pre approved by AOC, Schumer and Pelosi.Liberals have been indoctrinated that anything white is racist and anything black is a victim
Kamala is qualified for what she does. You never would be. Why are you so race obsessed?See? You had no point and no coherent response. Harris was the token chosen by the Democrat party. See? You reinforce a host of negative stereotypes because of your obsession race.
Practice with me... president trump. Say itHarris has her hands around Trump's jugular and his balls.
Practice with me... president trump. Say it
All anyone has to is read it moron.How? Produce the evidence. Crooks nearly murdered Trump. That is not diminishing his attempt.
A few days ago he was referring to "comman knowledge" while refusing to provide links.All anyone has to is read it moron.
The GOP didn't adjudicate Dobbs, the SCOTUS did.
These were justices who went through the ridiculous process of senate s**tshows and were confirmed. They have a specific function. To ensure federal laws comply with the Constitution of the United States.
There was a stupid, foolish, ignorant decision in 1973 that was based on some "right" that William O. Douglas extracted from his ass that nobody had really heard of before. Hiding in the penumbras of his ill-tempered mind. And with that manufactured garbage, Douglas and Co. removed from the states one if the powers they had exercised for almost 200 years.
The justices returned the power to the states where it is being determined by the people of those states.
I know it kills you to think that people with opinions different than your high-and-mighty-and-arrogant-and-ignorant blathering actually have a right to exercise their POV through the political (and not the judicial) process.
They lied at their hearings garbage. They answered stupid questions as best they could. The senate has no right (I recall Ted "I'm so glad he's dead" Chappaquiddick yelling at Alito about "protecting" the "gains" of the past 50 years. I hated Kennedy, the "liar of the senate" with a passion. And that helped me remember why. The senate has no business asking about settled law. NO LAW IS SETTLED. They court has reversed itself on hundreds of occasions.
It's a womans right. I don't get into that argument because it's really a matter of how you feel about the rights of the unborn. Roe was sickening in their analysis (and since when does SCOTUS use medical information to determine rights as defined by the Constitution ????). It isn't a right (Dobbs being that example) as granted by the Constitution. Want it to be a right.....get an amendment ratified.
I was beginning to wonder if senility had set in, but now I realize you misunderstood the concept. I wasn't talking about sexual assault but merely consensual relations.1. Older than you
2. I probably have more great-grandchildren
3. Sexual assault in a busy department store? Maybe by a manager in a locked office space, not in a public space
4. Agreed. If it actually happened she would have reported it and filed charges 30-years ago.
stop babbling if you can't offer anythingAll anyone has to is read it moron.
The vast majority of abortions are not the product of rape. They are convience…Which isn't the case here. They made up new law and threw out 50 years of precedent, because instead of having the good sense to appoint justices who were fair minded, Trump appointed a rapist and a religious fanatic to the court.
Actually, you are either too young or too stupid to realize WHY SCOTUS struck down the abortion laws. These laws were on the books, they were ROUTINELY ignored by women and their doctors.
SCOTUS barely "pulled this out of their ass". They had used the exact same reasoning when they struck down the equally silly contraception laws with Griswald v. Connecticut.
Naw, guy, I'm bothered that any state is going to tell a woman that she has to carry her rapist's baby to term. Because it's not only wrong, it's cruel.
He asked a valid question... is SCOTUS an interpreter or laws or just another legislature?
Actually, the analysis of Roe was meaningless because the same day, they ruled on Doe v. Bolton, which eliminated any restriction on late abortions under the construct of a woman's health (which is really the only reason any woman would get a late abortion. Nobody carries a baby for 8 months and says, "Fuck it, I'm getting an abortion.")
What amuses me is that you wingnuts screamed to high holy heaven about getting a Covid Shot, but you think it's okay to force a woman to have her rapist's baby in order to please your notions of what God wants.
It’s right there in your post. Are you so stupid as to not know what you type here?stop babbling if you can't offer anything
Kamala isn’t qualified to do anything…She’s a failure, like all of you progressives…Kamala is qualified for what she does. You never would be. Why are you so race obsessed?
She swallows.I don’t know how she made it into DC because she is nothing like the typical powerful black women around here
The vast majority of abortions are not the product of rape. They are convience…
Kamala isn’t qualified to do anything…She’s a failure, like all of you progressives…
Exceptions for rape and incest can, and would be made. It's up to the states. Where it should be.Sure.
Put the point is, if you think that a fetus should have more rights than the woman it is inside, you have to force women to have their rapist's babies.
If the woman can't afford to have a baby then she shouldn't be careless in the act that produces a baby. Simple as that. Contraception is widely available, and easy to obtain. It's called responsibility.And once you admit how cruel that is, then you have to admit that forcing a woman to have a baby that she can't afford, with a man she really didn't think was good husband material, is almost as cruel.
And your next President of these United States.
Why are you so race obssessed.Kamala isn’t qualified to do anything…She’s a failure, like all of you progressives…