Mueller's indictments lead straight to the White House. Trump will be gone by Christmas.

[M14 Shooter]

No crime no obstruction
how do you obstruct something that never existed

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

But he did.
He made a factual determination of everything necessary for a charge of obstruction, except corrupt intent.

NO HE DID NOT.

He did. They're in the report. You should read it.
10 factual determinations of obstructive acts, and 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation.
10 episodes where Trump might have obstructed justice
But -zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.
Zero.
You're posting pure bullshit.

lets this shut you up
direct quote from Mueller
“As we say in the report and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”

I know. So?

No crime no obstruction

wrong

Obstruction of Justice is a crime on it's own, like lying to FBI (which is a form of Obstruction).

Mueller talks about the non-criminal reasons over which they commit the crime of Obstruciton of Justice.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Mueller talks about the non-criminal reasons over which they commit the crime of Obstruciton of Justice.

Thank you for further demonstrating that you know nothing about this subject

 

[AntonToo]

But he did.
He made a factual determination of everything necessary for a charge of obstruction, except corrupt intent.

NO HE DID NOT.

He did. They're in the report.

Idiot, no they are not.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

He NEVER sais that any particular act the report describes is definitively Obstruction. They are described as POTENTIALLY Obstructive acts, because AGAIN, just because you are too much of an idiot to understand fairly simple concepts from the first go, Mueller did nothink he could make the determination under DOJ guidelines.

Stop posting bullshit while dodging specific example I gave you from the report.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

 

[AntonToo]

Mueller talks about the non-criminal reasons over which they commit the crime of Obstruciton of Justice.

Thank you for further demonstrating that you know nothing about this subject

Directly from Mueller report for our very special village idiots:

Mueller Report, vol. II, p. 157: "Obstruction of justice can be motivated by a desire to protect non-criminal personal interests, to protect against investigations where underlying criminal liability falls into a gray area, or to avoid personal embarrassment. The injury to the integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person committed an underlying wrong."

 

[Rustic]

But he did.
He made a factual determination of everything necessary for a charge of obstruction, except corrupt intent.

NO HE DID NOT.

He did. They're in the report.

Idiot, no they are not.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

He NEVER sais that any particular act the report describes is definitively Obstruction. They are described as POTENTIALLY Obstructive acts, because AGAIN, just because you are too much of an idiot to understand fairly simple concepts from the first go, Mueller did nothink he could make the determination under DOJ guidelines.

Stop posting bullshit while dodging specific example I gave you from the report.

... and still no Russian connection

 

[M14 Shooter]

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10

NO YOU DID NOT.

You provided NOT A SINGLE specific example.

On the other hand I DID - Page 24, Volume 2. and asked you to SPECIFICALLY point out ANY legal analysys or determination of wether or not Trump telling Comey to "let Flynn go" ammounted to Obstruction.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

No he DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10

NO YOU DID NOT.

There you go, lying again.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

No he DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10

NO YOU DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such determination from the report.

You can't because IT DOESN'T EXIST and Mueller EVEN TELLS YOU WHY, but again you are too much of a ******* moron to understand basic English.

 

[M14 Shooter]

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10

NO YOU DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such determination from the report.

I gave you a list of 10.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

Moron, quote ONE such "factual determination"

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10

NO YOU DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such determination from the report.

I gave you a list of 10.

Moron, quote ONE such determination from the report.


Not 10, just ONE

 

[M14 Shooter]

You need to keep up - I gave you the list of all 10

NO YOU DID NOT.

- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;

Moron, quote ONE such determination from the report.

I gave you a list of 10.

Moron, quote ONE such determination from the report.

I gave you a list of 10.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

I gave you a list of 10.

Ok quote yourself giving me a list of 10, out of which I will pick one and show you that it IS NOT an example of any determination by the Mueller, because he EXPLICITLY said he made no dermination.

GO.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I gave you a list of 10.

Ok quote yourself giving me a list of 10....

Scroll back, son. The fact your head is so far up your ass you missed the list I gave you is of no concern to me.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

I gave you a list of 10.

Ok quote yourself giving me a list of 10....

Scroll back, son.

Quote it son.

after all the quoting and linking and referencing I did, wasting my time on you, it's the least you can do.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I gave you a list of 10.

Ok quote yourself giving me a list of 10....

Scroll back, son.

Quote it son.

Scroll back, son. The fact your head is so far up your ass you missed the list I gave you is of no concern to me.

It does not matter how many times or how forcefully you lie to yourself, the facts remains:
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of obstructive acts;
- Mueller made 10 factual determinations of the relationship between those acts and an ongoing investigation;
- Mueller made zero- factual determinations of corrupt intent.

Absent the factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice.

 

[AntonToo]

I gave you a list of 10.

Ok quote yourself giving me a list of 10....

Scroll back, son.

Quote it son.

Scroll back, son.

Quote it son. I don't see any such list from you.


Do you know how to?