Mueller Confirms Comey Assertions

[Reasonable]

Fake news

 

[Reasonable]

Breaking News: OP posts old news.

1/4/18 is old news?
Didn’t ur mother teach you if you don’t have anything smart to say, keep your mouth shut?

 

[Reasonable]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Mueller plays chess while Trump is playing pin the tail on the donkey.

 

[Reasonable]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Ummmmmm we already know this...Trump said he told Comey to say in public what Comey was saying in private with the president...and that was that Trump was not under investigation...the fact that Comey refused to say that in public was good reason to fire Comey and perfectly legal and proper....

You can bet your bottom dollar that Trump is now under investigation. Funny you’re going by news from 9 months ago.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Fake news

lying trump loons can't tell fact from fiction, wacko.

View attachment 169718



View attachment 169719




View attachment 169721

 

[bripat9643]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

None of that constitutes obstruction of justice. What you turds have to remember is that the Constitution gives Trump the authority to fire the FBI director, whatever the reason. Mewler can't get around that irrefutable fact.

 

[Lakhota]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

 

[Wyatt earp]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Mueller plays chess while Trump is playing pin the tail on the donkey.

By putting up his ace card Comey to testify last April?


How did that work out for you...


Heard you idiots were taking the day off and stuff


Lmfao...

 

[Wyatt earp]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

 

[Lakhota]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

You're assuming a "Republican" Senate. The House impeaches, the Senate convicts or acquits. Both may be in Democratic control before long.

 

[Mousterian]

Mueller would nail Trump, even if the Trump family wasn't continually feeding him hot evidence, mostly through brain-snap tweets;
Tick, tick, tick!

 

[Reasonable]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

It would be the House, Doofus, not the Senate.
If Trump is charged with serious crimes and the Congress shirks their responsibilities like they’ve been doing for the last year, you can wave bye bye to the Republican Party because the backlash will be swift and immense.

 

[Wyatt earp]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

You're assuming a "Republican" Senate. The House impeaches, the Senate convicts or acquits. Both may be in Democratic control before long.

100 seats in the Senate ..


Only 8 republicans for vote , 24 democrats..


Do the math you need 2/3rd = 67 votes ...

 

[Reasonable]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Mueller plays chess while Trump is playing pin the tail on the donkey.

By putting up his ace card Comey to testify last April?


How did that work out for you...


Heard you idiots were taking the day off and stuff


Lmfao...

There wouldn’t even be a criminal investigation on Trump if he didn’t fire Comey.
He’s his own worse enemy which by the way was a common comment by the people who work in the White House.
That and him being an “ imbecile. “‘

 

[Lakhota]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

You're assuming a "Republican" Senate. The House impeaches, the Senate convicts or acquits. Both may be in Democratic control before long.

100 seats in the Senate ..


Only 8 republicans for vote , 24 democrats..


Do the math you need 2/3rd = 67 votes ...

Funny. You're leaving out several other factors - such as survival instincts and 2020.

 

[Reasonable]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

None of that constitutes obstruction of justice. What you turds have to remember is that the Constitution gives Trump the authority to fire the FBI director, whatever the reason. Mewler can't get around that irrefutable fact.

In what dream fantasy of yours were you a federal prosecutor?
Trump has obstructed Justice numerous times but you give him a pass because that’s what you do.

 

[Wyatt earp]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

It would be the House, Doofus, not the Senate.
If Trump is charged with serious crimes and the Congress shirks their responsibilities like they’ve been doing for the last year, you can wave bye bye to the Republican Party because the backlash will be swift and immense.

By whom?

Red states ? What alternative reality do you live in?


We are in a new age of politics where the republicans used the Harry Reid option to get gorsuch in as supreme court justice..



You are living in a fantasy once again no Republican will bow down to a CRY baby Democrat and impeach or remove Trump from office...



The republicans congressman's and women's seen how you behaved when Hillary lost..

Like little two year old children. The republicans will never give into you toddlers youre crazy..

 

[Wyatt earp]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

None of that constitutes obstruction of justice. What you turds have to remember is that the Constitution gives Trump the authority to fire the FBI director, whatever the reason. Mewler can't get around that irrefutable fact.

In what dream fantasy of yours were you a federal prosecutor?
Trump has obstructed Justice numerous times but you give him a pass because that’s what you do.

Lynch and comey gave hillary a pass ...god damn it CRY baby ..

 

[Wyatt earp]

no doubt the trumpeters will cry copious crocodile tears over this.

The special counsel has received handwritten notes from Mr. Trump’s former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, showing that Mr. Trump talked to Mr. Priebus about how he had called Mr. Comey to urge him to say publicly that he was not under investigation. The president’s determination to fire Mr. Comey even led one White House lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading Mr. Trump about whether he had the authority to remove him.

The New York Times has also learned that four days before Mr. Comey was fired, one of Mr. Sessions’s aides asked a congressional staff member whether he had damaging information about Mr. Comey, part of an apparent effort to undermine the F.B.I. director. It was not clear whether Mr. Mueller’s investigators knew about this episode.

Mr. Mueller has also been examining a false statement that the president dictated on Air Force One in July in response to an article in The Times about a meeting that Trump campaign officials had with Russians in 2016. A new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, says that the president’s lawyers believed that the statement was “an explicit attempt to throw sand into the investigation’s gears,” and that it led one of Mr. Trump’s spokesmen to quit because he believed it was obstruction of justice.

Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation

Yep, Mueller is closing in...

To what a national embarrassment, when the Senate refuses to remove Trump?

You're assuming a "Republican" Senate. The House impeaches, the Senate convicts or acquits. Both may be in Democratic control before long.

100 seats in the Senate ..


Only 8 republicans for vote , 24 democrats..


Do the math you need 2/3rd = 67 votes ...

Funny. You're leaving out several other factors - such as survival instincts and 2020.

Did the democrats use survival instincts by voting NO to repeal Obama care and they ended up losing the house , the Senate and the presidency because of it?



So you are telling us democrats are as dumb as a box of rocks in Congress but republicans are smarter?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Mueller would nail Trump, even if the Trump family wasn't continually feeding him hot evidence, mostly through brain-snap tweets;
Tick, tick, tick!

And it does what?