California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,059
- 0
- Banned
- #101
not at all. the comment was over the line.
however, listening to laura's show and constantly hearing criticism of what people wear, or what they eat, or whatever bizarre hypothetical straw man laura wants to set up to attack people - mainly the obamas - with, well frankly i'm reminded of a high school girl that talks behind everyone's back.
she's a catty bitch and could be the poster child for what's wrong with political discourse in the country - right along with ed schultz.
There is no 'however'. Either what he said was wrong or it was not. Using 'however' is justifying what he said. There is nothing acceptable about calling a woman a 'slut' for any reason. You see that right? What you personally feel about Laura is of no consequence.... I don't care for Michelle Obama but I'd be all over some right wing asshole who called her a 'slut'... just like I have when right wingers have called her 'fat' or made other personal remarks about her. I don't justify it by using 'howevers'.
i don't know how to make it clear to you that i don't think ed's comments were appropriate.
other than flat out stating it, which i did.
You said that.... and then added 'however...' and that 'however' basically is justifying the comment. You either find the remark acceptable or you do not... there is no 'however'.