Opinion: Obama has explaining to do on Benghazi - CNN.com
You'll be the judge, right? Seriously?
MSNBC admits coverup? Was the network involved?
Look, there probably was some type of damage control going on. There always is. The Obama admin isn't the first and won't be the last.
So, they're guilty of trying keep the incident from being used as a political weapon -- which is exactly what the raving lunatics on the right are doing with it.
Their biggest mistake was in not realizing that the rabid nuts in the GOP (most of them now) would desperately try to use this against them no matter what.
Damage control is what is being done now, in an attempt to downplay the cover-up that is unraveling now.
This administration, starting with the President and continuing down the chain, deliberately lied to the American people for the purpose of political gain during an election, about an enemy attack on American diplomats. That was not damage control, it was malfeasance in office.
Why is it that none of the nutters on the oversight committee has accused Obama of lying about anything? Do you know more than they do? Have you more to gain by catching him lying than they do?
"Produce the timeline.."
Produce to who, you?
"Required will be evidence..."
Required by who, you?
"Why would you do that AND STILL demand an explanation..."
Yikes, you are certainly reading a great deal into my question. I'd like to know why they blamed the filmmaker. I don't know why they did that. Maybe they thought that, despite evidence to the contrary. If I knew, I wouldn't be asking. I'm not "demanding" anything. That's why I added the qualifier "it appears". See, I don't know, and neither my ego nor some partisan ideology requires me to pretend that I do.
Calm down. If you don't have an answer to my direct question, just say so.
.
But let's face--there isn't anyone alive today that paid any attention to Bengazi in October--that didn't know this was a cover up from the get go-including (MSNBC and all the other media outlets.) Even BBC--ABC--and CBS are on the warpath over this. They got Obama reelected by ignoring this and now that he is firmly into his second term--they bring out the WMD. 
Their ratings must have dropped into negative territory to do that---
We have sworn congressional testimony from Susan Rice--Hillary Clinton--David Patreaous--and Leon Panneta--all who lied under oath. I imagine it will be Hillary Clinton who gets run over with the steam roller on this one. Whether she is going to lye down and take it is the question. Obviously someone higher up the chain put out the talking points--and they with their midget brains followed along with the strategy.
It's very unfortunate that 4 people are dead over this--and now many careers will be destroyed along with reputations--over something so STUPID. All they had to do was admit it was a terrorist attack from the onset--and send in the troops to help out those in danger--versus giving a stand down order. Instead for political expediency they wanted to give the "illusion" that the world and especially Libya was free from terrorism after the death of Bin Laden and an election was soon coming.
And this is where this incident is very much like Watergate. Everyone is lying today as they were during the Nixon administration. Nixon---it was sections of an audio tapes that were deleted--and now it's emails--with several references to the danger in Lybia--terrorism and other things that have been deleted--and for nothing more than political reasons.
How far this goes--no one knows?
He is in jail because his video offended Obama. Think about it.
