‘Mr. Wonderful’ slams Trump ruling: ‘You might as well find guilty every real estate developer on Earth’

[Marener]

You should know, you claim to know everything about the case. It makes no sense that there weren't criminal charges.

I know more than you, obviously.

 

[martybegan]

***** all you want.

It’s still fraud.

Got no actual response because you know that's exactly what a fair appeals court will find.

 

[OldFlame]

I know more than you, obviously.

You know what you read in the judgment, you know nothing about the standard industry practices that are commonly used, or how they were skewed by the court.

And you obviously have zero explanation for why criminal charges weren't brought if there was fraud committed.

 

[Marener]

Got no actual response because you know that's exactly what a fair appeals court will find.

Nothing you said had anything to do with the facts of the case.

Submitting false information to a bank is fraud.

Don’t do it.

 

[OldFlame]

Nothing you said had anything to do with the facts of the case.

Submitting false information to a bank is fraud.

Don’t do it.

It's a crime, why wasn't he charged with fraud?

 

[Marener]

You know what you read in the judgment, you know nothing about the standard industry practices that are commonly used, or how they were skewed by the court.

And you obviously have zero explanation for why criminal charges weren't brought if there was fraud committed.

You apparently never heard of generally accepted accounting principles which determine how a financial statement is put together.

Or have you?

 

[OldFlame]

You apparently never heard of generally accepted accounting principles which determine how a financial statement is put together.

Or have you?

What does that have to do with what you quoted? Generally accepted accounting principles have nothing to do with this case.

You obviously have zero explanation for why criminal charges weren't brought if there was fraud committed.

 

[Marener]

It's a crime, why wasn't he charged with fraud?

Asked and answered.

 

[martybegan]

Nothing you said had anything to do with the facts of the case.

Submitting false information to a bank is fraud.

Don’t do it.

There are plenty of criminal fraud laws he could have been charged with, why did they go with this one?

 

[john doe 101]

I think the NY court in this case is corrupt, as well as the prosecutor.

Why? Trump is a crook. And a rapist

 

[martybegan]

Asked and answered.

you got no response.

Fraud is a crime. Where was the criminal prosecution?

 

[Marener]

What does that have to do with what you quoted? Generally accepted accounting principles have nothing to do with this case.

You obviously have zero explanation for why criminal charges weren't brought if there was fraud committed.

Of course they have to do with this case since it’s a case about a fraudulent financial statement which is governed by the GAAP standard.

 

[martybegan]

Why? Trump is a crook. And a rapist

Who hasn't been convicted of anything related to those two.

Show me where he was convicted of rape.

 

[Marener]

you got no response.

Fraud is a crime. Where was the criminal prosecution?

I don’t know. I never claimed to know.

 

[john doe 101]

Who hasn't been convicted of anything related to those two.

Show me where he was convicted of rape.

Carroll can legally call him a rapist.

 

[martybegan]

Carroll can legally call him a rapist.

No, she can't. That case will be overturned on appeal as well.

 

[martybegan]

I don’t know. I never claimed to know.

Because you don't want to know, because James' abuse of power got you what you wanted.

 

[OldFlame]

Asked and answered.

No, it was not answered. And you're completely incurious as to why he wasn't criminally charged. I guess you don't care, as long as he was fined and the story is all over the news, that's all you care about.

 

[john doe 101]

No, she can't. That case will be overturned on appeal as well.

Actually she can and she does.

 

[martybegan]

Actually she can and she does.

You got some stunning legal source that proves your point, soi boi fucktard?