Moscow want to end the war by "inflicting a critical defeat on Britain🇬🇧"

1704331079026.jpeg
 

That is what cities look like after savage street battles you Muppet, Raqqa looked like Dresden after US bombing not street fighting, Fallujah the same, the other image is Guernica after Hitler bombed it.
 

Attachments

  • 1704388288188.png
    1704388288188.png
    560 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
Doesn't take any love of Russia to admit that Zelenskyy and Ukraine and his nazi regime is a POS. Let them solve their own problems, they are nothing to me or the rest of the world.
What's wrong with using them to kill Russians?
 
yes at one time but I've studied enough Russian history to hate them on that alone.
What a ridiculous outlook, i have studied many peoples histories including Americans, that doesn't mean i am happy to see all Americans killed or get sadistic pleasure from it, you sound sick to me.
 
What's wrong with using them to kill Russians?
They said same thing about Osama bin Laden. Islamic terrorists or Ukrainian Nazies... No much difference - both are not tools, they are rabid dogs, and that's why they may be more dangerous for us, than for Russians. Turn Ukraine into "European Afghanistan" and it'll become more expensive (in resources and life's) then the first one.
Second - Russian civilians or even their infantrymen are not our problem. Their nuclear missiles are. Every single dollar wasted for "war on terror", or "fighting against Russian invasion" is a dollar that was not invested in new missiles, new bombers, new submarines, in our industry or agriculture. Average American household already had lost at least 6% of its real wealth, just for killing 1/1000 of a stupid Russian teenager.
Third - if the Russians decide that Americans are actually that irrational and stupid - the things might gonna messy.
 
They said same thing about Osama bin Laden. Islamic terrorists or Ukrainian Nazies... No much difference - both are not tools, they are rabid dogs, and that's why they may be more dangerous for us, than for Russians. Turn Ukraine into "European Afghanistan" and it'll become more expensive (in resources and life's) then the first one.
Second - Russian civilians or even their infantrymen are not our problem. Their nuclear missiles are. Every single dollar wasted for "war on terror", or "fighting against Russian invasion" is a dollar that was not invested in new missiles, new bombers, new submarines, in our industry or agriculture. Average American household already had lost at least 6% of its real wealth, just for killing 1/1000 of a stupid Russian teenager.
Third - if the Russians decide that Americans are actually that irrational and stupid - the things might gonna messy.
The Russians are not going to launch world war 3 just because we kill a few thousand of them.
 
The Russians are not going to launch world war 3 just because we kill a few thousand of them.

only in this way.
ps we must kill many more pig- dogs 🇸🇦 🐖 🇷🇺

Moscow horde´s war record :-

1856 defeated by Britain and France

1905 defeated by Japan

1917 defeated by Germany

1920 defeated by Poland, Finland, Estonia and all Baltic states

1939 defeated by Finland

1969 defeated by China

1989 defeated by Afghanistan

1989 defeated in the Cold War.

1996 defeated by Chechnya

2022 defeated by Ukraine

WW2 won USA/Britain , meanwhile Stalin's officers were shot or sent to the Gulags. Millions went to the Gulags, including Solzhenitsyn

Moscow's only victories come from invading smaller countries :-

a) Hungary 1956

b) Czechoslovakia 1968

c) Moldova 1992

d) Georgia 2008
30424.jpg
 
The Russians are not going to launch world war 3 just because we kill a few thousand of them.
Sure. But they are going to launch world War 3 to prevent genocide or forced Ukrainisation of twenty million of them, or to prevent deployment of NATO nuclear missiles in Ukraine (or usage of its airspace by US Air Force). If there is a choice between victory in a nuclear war (in which they won't lose more than one million of them) or defeat in the conventional war (which means death or Ukrainisation of twenty million of them, or even collapse of Russian Federation itself) - the choice is simple.
 
Sure. But they are going to launch world War 3 to prevent genocide or forced Ukrainisation of twenty million of them, or to prevent deployment of NATO nuclear missiles in Ukraine (or usage of its airspace by US Air Force). If there is a choice between victory in a nuclear war (in which they won't lose more than one million of them) or defeat in the conventional war (which means death or Ukrainisation of twenty million of them, or even collapse of Russian Federation itself) - the choice is simple.

What make you think the U.S. or other NATO members have any interest in basing any nuclear weapons in Ukraine?
 

Similar threads

Forum List

Back
Top