You keep trying to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Those excuses might sound good to you, but to NATO they don't justify an invasion.
I know it pretty well. NATO countries doesn't understand what is international law, they don't care about human rights, they cheered mass murders of Russians.... But there is one (and only one) thing that NATO countries understand. It is military power, and the threat of the virtually total nuclear annihilation.
China sends fentanyl compounds to the US killing 100,000 stupid Americans every year. Trump wants to end that.
He tell that he wants it. But, in fact, he (and anyone else in America) did nothing to fight the poisoners. Actually, US government and US laws protect, say, MJ-traders. An ordinary citizen have no right even to kill a pusher and burn down an official MJ-shop without being punished by the government.
It means that US government is cooperative with drug-dealers and, therefore, they are drug-dealers and poisoners themselves. That makes them traitors and criminals.
God is a tricky subject, He has strict rules. Here in the US we have freedom of religion, or freedom from religion. The battle-lines are teaching or exposing kids to homosexuality as democrats want to do, or to never mention homosexuality in schools as Republicans want to do as demanded by parental and religious rights. This battle is still ongoig.
No more than "Nanai Boys' Wrestling". You know, the sort of exhibition, imitating the fight between two boys, but actually with one man in both costumes.
Trump has a bullet scar on his ear to prove that. It is against civilized rules for democracies.
Trump was lucky. What about Kennedy? And what about uncounted victims of Killary and other politicians?
We have more than enough to survive a first strike.
No. The ocean becames more and more transparent with all those new detectors and new computer systems to analyse the signals.
Even read about, say, CEνNS antineutrino detectors?
You are very wrong. Rs and Ds are like night and day different.
In practical terms - no. Just the little cosmetic changes.
The USSR broke apart because Communism lost to Capitalism...long story short.
Actually, "pure communism" lost in 1919, when the Soviets understood that more or less free market is absolutely necessary. And the "pure capitalism" never existed, at least because on the "absolutely free markets" given the very definition of the term, should be, among other things, the services of people who limit the freedoms of the markets.
True, You just described the Biden administration.
All administrations. As if Trump didn't order illegal attack against Syria.
Democracy doesn't work when the 'free press" becomes a government propaganda network, like here in the US.
So, there is no democracy in the USA (and even less in the EU).
I'm talking since WW2, since we're alive. NATO has zero invasions.
The USA commited a lot of invasions. They just didn't want to take responsibility and prefered raids, not proper conquest.
To me invaded means "to capture" and keep territory. The countries NATO invaded kept is zero.
Wven with your "narrow" definition, Germany invaded and still keep DDR. England invaded and still keep Falklands. NATO invaded Serbia and still have the base in Kosovo. But, actually, people prefer the wider meanings of the term - like, you know, Invasion is when you use military force against other countries.
Democracy is a political system, where the majority rules, it is not a disease, a dictatorship is a disease.
Actually, in all political systems minority rules and in most political systems this minority cares about the will of majority. Any man has as much power over you as you give him.
Where/when does capitalism kill people? It can't its an economic system, it has no army.
Any economic or political system exists only because they have Army and Police.
We helped Ukrainians defend their country from a Russian invasion.
Is it why the borders are closed and male Ukrainians can't leave Ukraine ? Is it why most of them can't freely use the language they prefer? Is that why all opposition is opressed and death squads kill people without judje decision and "president" office take property of other people by its own decision?
A plain lie. Ukrainians only kill Russian invaders or violent rioters.
Man, establish "The High Council of Den-ggerisation and Delatinization" in the USA, ban "Black music" (including Rap and Jazz), declare that the Democrats are enemies of America and force them to leave the USA or die in death camps.... And yes, you'll have both "violant rioters" and "civil war" in the USA.
In practical terms it means that any ceasefire that won't include equal rights to Russian speakers will immediately cause "violent riots" (or "justful rebellions") in, say, Odessa and Kharkov. If Kievan regime try to supress them by military force - Russian Federation will be involved (with or without Putin's order). If Putin sides with anti-Russians, and try to stop Russian help to Russian people, ok, he'll be killed by Russian people and the next president will destroy Kievan regime.
So Russians fomented unrest among ethnic Russians living in Ukraine, giving Putin the pretext to invade to "save"ethnic Russians.
Russians are human beings. Russians are fighting for their rights. You attack one of us, you attack all of us. You ban Russian language - Russian protest against it (peacefully or violently). You use military force against them - they use military force against you. If Putin (or anybody else) don't want to defend Russians - he cease being Russian president.
That's why there are always wars in Europe, too much ethnic mixing and too much political ambition for more territory.
Big amount of ethnicities isn't bad by itself. When the government protect all of them, if there is no really significant discrimination and attempts of genocide - people prefer live in peace.
Careful, you don't want to start something you can't finish.
Of course we can finish you. It might be costly, but possible.
You can make demands of NATO, but what do you do when NATO says "**** off"?
First, we'll eliminate NATO's (first of all, American) nuclear weapons and suggest new (worse for you) peace term. If you reject our quite moderate and reasonable peace terms (you don't retaliate, you return us Alaska and California, but the USA still exists as an independent power) and launch counter-value strike, we'll bomb you with nukes, chemical, biological weapons and autonomous robot systems until your unconditional surrender or total anni
Russia has boundaries/borders for a reason.
All boundaries are limited. More pressure - lesser boundaries.
In the case of a nation whose enemies' avowed objective is nothing short of physical annihilation, there is no defensive that can be called extreme. And, of course, there is no boundaries when you are fighting for your very physical survival.
American foreign policy varies based on who is president. I like Marco Rubio, he is smart and tough. Vance is smart and tough, but is too young. Democrats are too stupid.
In practical terms they are all the same. They both understand only the language of force.
The US and NATO kept and are keeping the world order since WW2.
No. It was system of collective defense (including UN) that was keeping the peace.
But countries like China are now on the stage looking for more influence.
They have pretty good reasons to want it, haven't they? I mean, the suggested world system, in which China and India provide cheap labour force, Russia, Middle East, Africa and Latin America provide cheap resources, Europe and America military and politically supress them all, but morally degrade and invite the tons of foreigners - it doesn't seem satisfactory for most of people (including ordinary people of America and Europe, who are losing their jobs, who are losing their land, who are losing their moral laws and who are forced to fight and die in the absolutely unnecessary for them wars).
Mongol ulus they practice annihilation, extermination and deportations of whole nations and replacing them with loyal population. They do it since 15th century. 
