g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 131,656
- 75,716
- 2,605
The Scriptures make no mention of LDS.Doesn't matter. They are NOT true Christians, not according to the Scriptures.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Scriptures make no mention of LDS.Doesn't matter. They are NOT true Christians, not according to the Scriptures.
Doesn't matter. They are NOT true Christians, not according to the Scriptures.
It was well known that there were civilizations in Central and South America. The Spanish conquered the Aztecs and the Incas.1. How did Joseph Smith know about the existence of civilizations in central and south Americal ?
It was well known that there were civilizations in Central and South America. The Spanish conquered the Aztecs and the Incas.
Nevertheless, the civilizations in Central and South America had no connection with civilizations in the Near East. They gave no indication of being established by Jewish immigrants, as The Book of Mormon would lead us to believe.
What matters is that Joseph Smith was a religious charlatan, a liar, and a fraud. There is no independent evidence that any of the events recorded in The Book of Mormon happened, and much evidence that none of it happened.Was that knowledge common to the folks in the Northeat in the early 1800's ? His schooling was limited and he was 14 when he made his first pronouncement.
Seems highly unlikely.
Again, not that I get all caught up in that. It really does not matter to me.
What matters is that Joseph Smith was a religious charlatan, a liar, and a fraud. There is no independent evidence that any of the events recorded in The Book of Mormon happened, and much evidence that none of it happened.
I cannot prove that Jesus rose from the dead after three days in the tomb. I cannot prove that he did not.If that's what you need.
Of course, the concept of faith, at this point is pretty much discarded.
What evidence do you have that the resurrection is a real thing ?
That Christ turned water to wine ?
That Christ walked on water ?
Come to think of it, I might not believe in the bible (using your implied standards).
Nevertheless, the civilizations in Central and South America had no connection with civilizations in the Near East. They gave no indication of being established by Jewish immigrants, as The Book of Mormon would lead us to believe.
Manasseh and Ephraim were Israelite tribes. They were descended from Joseph, and are called "the half tribes." There is no indication of Israelite DNA in the Americas prior to the coming of the Europeans.The Book of Mormon does not claim that they were Jewish.
They were of the tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim, not of Judah.
Bob Blaylock,The Book of Mormon does not claim that they were Jewish.
They were of the tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim, not of Judah.
That's part of Mormonism's roots in Freemasonry
"Heresy" requires the existence of orthodoxy. Joe Smith, Brigham Young, and others in their posse believed that they could make stuff up as they went along, and apparently they were pretty persuasive because they convinced a lot of people to believe things that went against what those people had been brought up to believe (i.e., KJV). And when I say, "went against," I mean 180 degrees against, for example, God was once a man just like us, and was exalted to godhood. Gimmeafukkinbreak.
To my way of thinking, the story of the Book of Abraham illustrates the total fraudulence of Smith and those who were in his inner circle. Smith was asked to "translate" an Egyptian scroll, since he claimed to have translated the BoM from "reformed Egyptian." He gladly accepted the challenge and made up an entire book out of (as the lawyers say) "whole cloth." It was later exposed as nothing more than a funerary tract, having nothing to do with Abraham or any other Hebrew.
And yet it is still included in Mormon scriptures.
As Dave Barry often says, "You couldn't make this up."
It speaks very badly for anyone's faith, who feels a need to slander other faiths in order to elevate his own.
Was that knowledge common to the folks in the Northeat in the early 1800's ? His schooling was limited and he was 14 when he made his first pronouncement.
Seems highly unlikely.
Again, not that I get all caught up in that. It really does not matter to me.
There wouldn't be a mention of Nephi in the Bible because his writings only occurred after leaving Jerusalem to sail to the Americas. Nephites are the descendants of Nephi and would only arise in the Americas and not in Israel.In several instances, Nephi described himself and his people as Jews. Some have thought that the term Jew is out of place in the Book of Mormon, based on the assumption that it was only used after the Jewish exile which ended around 537 B.C.—long after Lehi’s family left Jerusalem.
The Nephites are described as a group of people that descended from or were associated with Nephi, a son of the prophet Lehi, who left Jerusalem at the urging of God in about 600 BC and traveled with his family to the Western Hemisphere and arrived to the Americas in about 589 BC.
There's no mention of either in the Bible.
Can you show me in the Book of Mormon where Nephi referred to himself and his people as Jews?In several instances, Nephi described himself and his people as Jews.
Who are some? There are prophesies of the Jews in the Book of Mormon.Some have thought that the term Jew is out of place in the Book of Mormon, based on the assumption that it was only used after the Jewish exile which ended around 537 B.C.—long after Lehi’s family left Jerusalem.
Nephi's ministry was in the America's and would not be mentioned in a history of Israel.The Nephites are described as a group of people that descended from or were associated with Nephi, a son of the prophet Lehi, who left Jerusalem at the urging of God in about 600 BC and traveled with his family to the Western Hemisphere and arrived to the Americas in about 589 BC.
Neither is in the Bible.