More Winning....

[BluesLegend]

$4T+ in freshly printed money was the primary driver.

Meh $4 trillion currency devaluation, $10 trillion in new debt, don't worry about it we can go on doing that forever, right? /SARCAMS /INFINITY

Do you blame Bush for the stock market being lower at the end of his term than when he started?

Or do you have a retarded excuse to give him a pass?

Was Bush a conservative? **** no, ask an intelligent question.

An intelligent question? How did you get to be so uninformed?

How did you get to be a shit for brains leftwit troll?

 

[BluesLegend]

$4T+ in freshly printed money was the primary driver.

Meh $4 trillion currency devaluation, $10 trillion in new debt, don't worry about it we can go on doing that forever, right? /SARCAMS /INFINITY

Do you blame Bush for the stock market being lower at the end of his term than when he started?

Or do you have a retarded excuse to give him a pass?

Was Bush a conservative? **** no, ask an intelligent question.

An intelligent question? How did you get to be so uninformed?

well he is right, Bush is not a conservative.

Conservatives are pissed at the GOP establishment spend-o-holics.

 

[BlindBoo]

Yes, Barak Obama can thank the Democrats who had a near Super majority control of congress - who controlled the budget, spending, & economy, for 2 years before he became President and during his 1st 2 years in office for the economy he inherited.

Don’t forget: the president needed a supermajority because of the Republicans’ unprecedented use of the filibuster as an obstruction tactic — they’ve used it more than400 times.

President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.

He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken’s election in Minnesota and he didn’t get seated for seven months.

The President’s cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania’s Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.

That gave the President 59 votes — still a vote shy of the super majority.

But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.

So while the President’s number on paper was 59 Senators — he was really working with just 58 Senators.

Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 — but only in theory, because Senator Byrd was still out.

In August, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts died and the number went back down to 59 again until Paul Kirk temporarily filled Kennedy’s seat in September.

Any pretense of a supermajority ended on February 4, 2010 when Republican Scott Brown was sworn into the seat Senator Kennedy once held.Do you see a two-year supermajority?

I didn’t think so.

Debunking the Myth: Obama's Two-Year Supermajority | HuffPost

 

[jc456]

Yes, Barak Obama can thank the Democrats who had a near Super majority control of congress - who controlled the budget, spending, & economy, for 2 years before he became President and during his 1st 2 years in office for the economy he inherited.

Don’t forget: the president needed a supermajority because of the Republicans’ unprecedented use of the filibuster as an obstruction tactic — they’ve used it more than400 times.

President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.

He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken’s election in Minnesota and he didn’t get seated for seven months.

The President’s cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania’s Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.

That gave the President 59 votes — still a vote shy of the super majority.

But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.

So while the President’s number on paper was 59 Senators — he was really working with just 58 Senators.

Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 — but only in theory, because Senator Byrd was still out.

In August, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts died and the number went back down to 59 again until Paul Kirk temporarily filled Kennedy’s seat in September.

Any pretense of a supermajority ended on February 4, 2010 when Republican Scott Brown was sworn into the seat Senator Kennedy once held.Do you see a two-year supermajority?

I didn’t think so.

Debunking the Myth: Obama's Two-Year Supermajority | HuffPost

just so the facts are straight, franken lost and requested a recount and extra ballots were processed to give him the victory. that we all know.

 

[BlindBoo]

Yes, Barak Obama can thank the Democrats who had a near Super majority control of congress - who controlled the budget, spending, & economy, for 2 years before he became President and during his 1st 2 years in office for the economy he inherited.

Don’t forget: the president needed a supermajority because of the Republicans’ unprecedented use of the filibuster as an obstruction tactic — they’ve used it more than400 times.

President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.

He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken’s election in Minnesota and he didn’t get seated for seven months.

The President’s cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania’s Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.

That gave the President 59 votes — still a vote shy of the super majority.

But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.

So while the President’s number on paper was 59 Senators — he was really working with just 58 Senators.

Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 — but only in theory, because Senator Byrd was still out.

In August, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts died and the number went back down to 59 again until Paul Kirk temporarily filled Kennedy’s seat in September.

Any pretense of a supermajority ended on February 4, 2010 when Republican Scott Brown was sworn into the seat Senator Kennedy once held.Do you see a two-year supermajority?

I didn’t think so.

Debunking the Myth: Obama's Two-Year Supermajority | HuffPost

just so the facts are straight, franken lost and requested a recount and extra ballots were processed to give him the victory. that we all know.

The recount was automatic and not requested. Why do you feel the need to lie? After the recount when Coleman lost, his campaign contested the vote and lost.

But that is just known history.

Barack and the Dem had a super-majority for a few months and the end of 2009, until Feb 2010. not two years.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"The Dow Jones industrial average rose more than 100 points on Monday as Cisco Systems' stock popped on the back of a massive cyberattack. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq composite also rose and hit record highs."

THOUGTS:
1. Thank you, President Trump

LOL, what a difference a few days makes:

Cisco to cut 1,100 more jobs amid a worse-than-expected business outlook