More proof that Democrats are the worst people in the world.

[PredFan]

The job of the Supreme Court is to make sure that decisions by the lower courts, laws passed by Congress and the States, and anything else done by politicians or people in power abide by our Constitution.

Yesterday the Court ruled on a case where teachers in the state of California sued to not be forced to pay collective bargaining fees if they aren't part of the Union. In other words, teachers that don't want to be part of the union were being forced to pay.

Freedom right? Well, not according to the Liberals in the court.

The ruling ended up in a tie, which meant the lower court decision stood intact. Of course it was split right along party lines. The Liberal justices decided that it didn't violate the Constitution!?!?!? So, instead of doing their jobs, they ruled in favor of a major Democrat Party donor and FORCED Americans again to pay for something they don't want.

Of course we all know that this isn't the first time this has happened. Many other examples can be given. With liberals, it's party first and freedom, liberty, our country, human rights, decency, and the future of our children, come last.

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe Republicans should allow the vacant seat to be filled so we don't get these 4-4 decisions

Judges are not Democratic or Republican




.

 

[PredFan]

Maybe Republicans should allow the vacant seat to be filled so we don't get these 4-4 decisions

Judges are not Democratic or Republican

That's pretty stupid, even for you.

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe Republicans should allow the vacant seat to be filled so we don't get these 4-4 decisions

Judges are not Democratic or Republican

That's pretty stupid, even for you.

What I usually get from you when you can't refute a post

U IS STOOPID!

 

[Iceweasel]

Liberals use courts to ram their agendas down our throats. It does highlight how important it is to not let another progressive near the SCOTUS bench.

 

[rightwinger]

Liberals use courts to ram their agendas down our throats. It does highlight how important it is to not let another progressive near the SCOTUS bench.

Citizens United
Heller
Hobby Lobby

I don't see you complaining about those

How about when Conservatives tried to use the courts to repeal Obamacare?

 

[Freewill]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

 

[Freewill]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

 

[Iceweasel]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Yep, and they could only pull it off by calling it a tax. Which it isn't.

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Roberts didn't rewrite anything
The law stood as written

 

[mudwhistle]

Maybe Republicans should allow the vacant seat to be filled so we don't get these 4-4 decisions

Judges are not Democratic or Republican




.

Yes they are. Rulings by far-left advocate judges follow liberal ideology to a tee.

 

[mudwhistle]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Roberts didn't rewrite anything
The law stood as written

Nonsense. He had to change the law to make it constitutional.

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe Republicans should allow the vacant seat to be filled so we don't get these 4-4 decisions

Judges are not Democratic or Republican




.

Yes they are. Rulings by far-left advocate judges follow liberal ideology to a tee.

You don't understand the difference between Democrat/Republican and Liberal/Conservative do you?

 

[Freewill]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Roberts didn't rewrite anything
The law stood as written

Nonsense. He had to change the law to make it constitutional.

And they did it after our Constitutional law professor swore up and down it wasn't a tax. Even he knew it was unconstitutional if it were a tax, but the SCOTUS just ignored that fact.

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Roberts didn't rewrite anything
The law stood as written

Nonsense. He had to change the law to make it constitutional.

He didn't change anything

The law stands as written

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Roberts didn't rewrite anything
The law stood as written

Nonsense. He had to change the law to make it constitutional.

And they did it after our Constitutional law professor swore up and down it wasn't a tax. Even he knew it was unconstitutional if it were a tax, but the SCOTUS just ignored that fact.

Once again

It was Republicans trying to use the court to accomplish what they couldn't do legislatively....just what the OP complains about

 

[Freewill]

Yeah Obamacare was challenged in the courts twice and both times the SCOTUS had to rewrite the law.

This ruling is in line with all their other rulings that say people can be forced to do anything that the state desires. Started back with Dred Scott.

A law poorly written law today that meets an agenda can just go to the SCOTUS to be rewritten in a way that suits the justices. Matter of fact even if there isn't a law they will just make law as they did with gay marriage.

This 4/4 split is a God send for Roberts. Now he doesn't need to cross over ideological lines. He can vote with the conservative half and still the liberal half will win.

It was Republicans trying to use the courts to repeal Obamacare after they failed legislatively
The Courts told them to pound sand

You object to the courts until you want them to support your agenda

If Obamacare was constitutional as written there would have been no need for Roberts to rewrite the damn thing.

Roberts didn't rewrite anything
The law stood as written

Sigh, do you and Mrs. Tuzla forget this is the Internet age?
Roberts rewrites Obamacare, again: Opposing view

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"More proof that Democrats are the worst people in the world."

More proof that most on the right are ignorant partisan hacks .

 

[mudwhistle]

Maybe Republicans should allow the vacant seat to be filled so we don't get these 4-4 decisions

Judges are not Democratic or Republican




.

Yes they are. Rulings by far-left advocate judges follow liberal ideology to a tee.

You don't understand the difference between Democrat/Republican and Liberal/Conservative do you?

Yes.

Is that your natural response.....to lie?