beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 48,425
- 18,836
- 2,250
Convenient for you eh ?I do not believe in the devil or angels.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Convenient for you eh ?I do not believe in the devil or angels.
Thank you for proving my point.You need to stop thinking projection is a good comeback. Speaking facts isn't anger', except in your tiny little brain; you beleive all that pop psychobabble really means something. Most Useful Idiots do.
Yes, it is good not to need blind faith.Convenient for you eh ?
By this verbiage you try to hide your inability to answer a direct question? Okay, you are free now, kid.You pseudointellectual twit. What don't you understand about the inherently contradictory, self-negating piffle of relativism? What don't you understand about the reality that no institution of education exists in an ideological vacuum? What don't you understand about the imperatives of natural and constitutional law, and, thus, the imperative of universal school choice?
You're a mindless conformist asking all the wrong questions.
There's a Reason that our Founders made for aGood point about the responsibility issue. If the parents want to raise their children to believe in the certain contents found in book's, then let them be responsible for it, not the government.... The government shouldn't be tricked or dragged into the sponsoring or advocating on behalf of group's that make up a minority section of society, otherwise when the majority counters, and agrees on what constitutes freedom and decency in society. Same goes for abortion's etc.
Government shouldn't be using it's power to enforce or influence anything upon society other than those things in which constitutes decency and a moral standard that is agreed upon by the majority. The only place to find the decency and moral codes is in the book of life, and that book to us is the Holy Bible in this United States of America.
That { Blind FAith } was a quite popular Eric ClaptonYes, it is good not to need blind faith.
Agree, but you left out what effect it has on you as a person, and what are you researching the historical person for ? Is it for his or her bad side or for their good side ? Again it depends on the researcher. It all leads back to one's upbringing, character, and intent as to what they draw out of the research.
This is a lie.Parents, and parents. All public school districts in the U.S. are independent and run locally, at least in theory. People love the 'free' federal money, and have been brainwashed into believing they have to turn over control to the Feds and/or state governments to take it. They don't, and the Fed can't discriminate against those who refuse to turn over control to them.
So you can look into a person's body, and give everyone the analysis of their sickness outcomes, otherwise as to whether they will live or die eh ? Not just prayer and faith works for you, because you have attributes that allow you to know what everyone else don't know eh ?? Remember you don't have blind faith, you just know without a doubt eh ??Yes, it is good not to need blind faith.
Another lie.Rubbish. They aren't censoring the book, they're just determining it's unsuitable for their classrooms. And they're right. Do you think forcing people to buy certain books is 'anti-censorship' or something, and a choice not to read or buy a book is 'censorship'?
Oh, come on. What school validates with this book? A couple of words and some pics?What kids learn from street gutter trash and from pool halls and porn sites doesn't have to be validated by establishments like public schools and public institutions like government.
If you live in a town full of idiots and degenerates, then you're just screwed; tough shit. It's not the Fed's job to do anything about it, and besides they can't do anything about that if they wanted to, since most of the education bureaucrats are degenerate idiots themselves.
Actually, it more reminds of mob rule.
Let not your evil deeds be known, otherwise it is for the sinner to repent, and to try their best to move away from, (i.e.not to encourage or teach others the same).. To teach the little one's to sin is an abomination, and it would be better that a person strap a talent about the neck, and to sink themselves to the bottom of the ocean. It's just that bad..
No, I didn't forget anything ... That's why I asked both questions.
There is no event in History that someone knows of, and that is a secret.
The History is there for all to see ... The individual just has to want to know the truth in all its ugliness.
There is no historical figure that ever simply did as society requires or desires.
It's when they stepped above that bar that they became a legend.
And none of them got there without getting their hands dirty or pissing someone off ...
Except for maybe a famous ice skater or something.
.
Furthermore ...There's a Reason that our Founders made for a
First Amendment { a virtual afterthought to these
Drat Democrats and their benefactor MSM }
It is simple,yet dynamic.A first of it's kind in the World.
" Thus,if the First Amendment means anything in this
field,it must allow protests even against the moral
code that the standard of the day sets for the community.In other words,literature should not be
suppressed merely because it offends the moral code
of the censor. " - William O. Douglas
Furthermore ... Ask the Black Community when they
saw fit to Ban books and writings by those like James
Baldwin or Malcomb X .I see where it is being mentioned that
Malcomb X's autobiography was Banned.In the year 1984 due to
the growing numbers of Black Panthers.
I guess that explains the movie as well.
- Malcomb X - { 1992 }.
Where Real History buffs will learn how an American
President Was Banned.Both Literally,Intellectually and by
Twitter twits.Plus all forms of Social Media as well.
Guess what President that might have been.One Very
popular Potus.One Very White Popular Potus.
You are obviously uneducated, so it's obvious that your own parents did not get involved and you are just projecting, here.Because most parents do not get involved in schools and their children's education, except to complain.
Let not your evil deeds be known, otherwise it is for the sinner to repent, and to try their best to move away from, (i.e.not to encourage or teach others the same).. To teach the little one's to sin is an abomination, and it would be better that a person strap a talent about the neck, and to sink themselves to the bottom of the ocean. It's just that bad.
Actually, democracy doesn't work this way. Under 'democratic' rule, you choose representatives for some term who are able to take decisions on some matters and enforce these decisions..
Or Democracy ... Take your pick ...
.
Yet the teaching of slavery in schools, and about those who engaged in it is causing grave effects upon the mind's of our youth today, otherwise who are then going forth to battle in the streets over something that no one is guilty of today.Oh, come on. What school validates with this book? A couple of words and some pics?
So, you want to give some idiots a right to decide what is taught in schools to prevent other idiots from doing so? A questionable tactic. Actually, it more reminds of mob rule.
Actually, democracy doesn't work this way. Under 'democratic' rule, you choose representatives for some term who are able to take decisions on some matters and enforce these decisions.