More examples of Socialism in America: Homeowner Associations...

insein

Senior Member
Apr 10, 2004
6,096
360
48
Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_np=0&u_pg=1636&u_sid=1108711

Man's flag flies in face of apartment policy

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Every morning since 9/11, Donald Lamp has hung his American flag from the balcony of his Omaha apartment.


The Omaha retirement community where Donald Lamp lives wants him to take his flag down. He refuses, having flown it since the Sept. 11 attacks. Lamp's son-in-law is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Management of the retirement community where he and his wife live - citing policy about maintaining the appearance of the building's exterior - wants him to lower the flag for good.

Lamp refuses.

"I'm not about to take it down," the 89-year-old World War II veteran said.

Lamp is like many Americans who, because of housing covenants, are discouraged from flying their flags this Memorial Day weekend.

What makes Lamp different is that he is the father-in-law of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

That makes no difference to Cathy McGrath, general manager of the Arboretum.

"We have a lot of important people here," she said.

Donald and Marjorie Lamp, whose daughter Virginia is married to Thomas, said they don't want to use their connection to the judge to influence anybody.

"We don't go around saying my son-in-law is Clarence Thomas," he said. "You don't do that. He wouldn't like to have us do that."

Virginia Thomas, who works for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington, said she is keeping her husband out of the fray.

"I'm just his crazy, activist wife," she said of Justice Thomas. "It's just me and my dad pushing this."

McGrath said the Arboretum's board of directors set a policy when the community opened in 1998 to forbid exterior hangings such as windsocks, wind chimes, planters and flags.

Lamp said an exception should be made for U.S. flags.

McGrath said U.S. flags are flown on poles at three locations around the Arboretum. A committee of residents puts up and takes down the flags and adheres to the rules for displaying them.

"If he continues to fly the flag, we're not going to go and remove him physically," she said. "There really is very little we can do."

Lamp said the flag, which flew over the U.S. Capitol, was a gift from Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.

The Lamps' next-door neighbor, Grace Hansen, said she supports them.

"I approve of it, and I've never heard of anyone ever having a problem with it," she said. "I can see it out my window, and I look forward to seeing it out there every morning. It means everything's right in the world."


Contact the Omaha World-Herald newsroom

Aint anbody, anywhere, gonna tell me to take my Flag down. EVER!!!

I hate Homeowner Ass.'s with a passion.
 
I'm glad I live in Texas! My neighbor 2 homes down has a "schoolyard-sized" flagpole sporting the USA flag as well as the British, and the HMA didn't dare say a thing about it! I think if I lived in CA or NY I would surely perish!:usa:
 
I am a Property Manager for Homeowner's Associations. Have been for 13 years. Issues like these come up and it is up to the professional managers to make Boards and Homewoners aware fo covenant restrictions that are unenforceable. Prohibitions against flying the flag is one such innenforceable restriction.

I will have to dig to find the link, but there was a ruling in CA on this same issue whereing an HOA tried to enforce thier flag rule. The courts struck it down based on a Federal Law which obviously trumps any CC&R (covenant).

If/when I find it, I will post it - both the court case and the Fed. Statute.
 
A generation ago, anyone arguing for the right of a woman to murder her unborn child would have been called a nut. Anyone screaming for the right of a man to marry another man would have been called a pervert.

And anyone voicing opposition to the flying of the American flag would have gotten his natural ass kicked.

Isn't it wonderful how we've progressed?
 
Originally posted by musicman
A generation ago, anyone arguing for the right of a woman to murder her unborn child would have been called a nut. Anyone screaming for the right of a man to marry another man would have been called a pervert.

And anyone voicing opposition to the flying of the American flag would have gotten his natural ass kicked.

Isn't it wonderful how we've progressed?

It would be, except some people are reluctant for change and progress, as if their 'status quo' is going to be affected.
 
My position on the issue: The guy can move to a retirement community that does not hold such a restriction. As good and as patriotic as he may be, he is supposed to follow the rules.
 
I have to agree with mattskramer (mornin' matty), if you read it and signed it, no soup for you; grow up, honor your commitments.
 

Forum List

Back
Top