OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 9,587
- 7,817
- 1,938
I'm a little short right now to cover that bet. Pam Bondi has no interest in an investigation.
Who said Bondi has to investigate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a little short right now to cover that bet. Pam Bondi has no interest in an investigation.
"I might be totally wrong, but I'm a dancing fool." -F ZappaIf you really believe it was a coincidence, then you're a complete and total fool.
"I might be totally wrong, but I'm a dancing fool." -F Zappa
You can see the crazy in many Progs with power.That he got the case seemed odd to me too. But I'm glad!
One of these gentlemen is tougher than the other:
View attachment 1094073
Something, something, attorney general. I suppose Kash could look into it, but I doubt that he has the stomach for what he might find.Who said Bondi has to investigate?
No, that's a good song.Cop out.
Something, something, attorney general. I suppose Kash could look into it, but I doubt that he has the stomach for what he might find.
I have no idea. This could've been easily swept under the rug as a dumb mistake. Walz already stated that he was to blame. But, as I mentioned before, it's not the deed, it's the attempted cover up that kicks your ass.What would he find? A traitor?
I have no idea. This could've been easily swept under the rug as a dumb mistake. Walz already stated that he was to blame. But, as I mentioned before, it's not the deed, it's the attempted cover up that kicks your ass.
I have no idea. This could've been easily swept under the rug as a dumb mistake. Walz already stated that he was to blame. But, as I mentioned before, it's not the deed, it's the attempted cover up that kicks your ass.
Here's a pic that suggests that they might have spoken to each other before.He did that because that is what a leader with integrity does.
He also said that he doesn't know Goldberg, nor is Goldberg in his contacts, so that means he didn't personally add him.
Here's a pic that suggests that they might have spoken to each other before.
He's already claimed that someone else must've somehow added him to his contacts.
Lie to stay out of trouble; It's the American way!
View attachment 1094075
He's quoted as saying: "I've never met Jeffery Goldberg before."He never claimed he didn't ever talk to him, he said he didn't have him in his contacts, he doesn't know him well enough that he would have his contact info. Why do you idiots think a picture with 2 people in it proves anything? Does he know all of the other people in that picture as well?
We now know who actually added Goldberg to the Signal chat.
A guy named Alex Wong, playing the role originated by Alexander Vindman.
He's quoted as saying: "I've never met Jeffery Goldberg before."
It doesn't matter who was in the chat. The fact that they used Signal at all to communicate between high level cabinet members is a violation of security.
At best they should all be fired for gross incompetence.
They did.And your picture proves otherwise? Did everyone in that photo go around introducing themselves to each other?
Oops.... guess we should go back and fire the entire Obama and Biden admin's because they both used it.![]()
Proof?