OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 9,587
- 7,817
- 1,938
It was the attempt to cover up the Watergate break in that forced Nixon to resign.
What, specifically, was the attempt to 'cover it up'?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was the attempt to cover up the Watergate break in that forced Nixon to resign.
Of course not. It’s just “something to say”She didn’t add the reporter did she.
More and More It Looks Like the Signal Kerfuffle Was a Set-Up
We now know who actually added Goldberg to the Signal chat.
You nut jobs will say anything.I've been trying to tell people that since this thing started. Just said it again a few minutes ago. Signal gate is all a leftist set up. Democrats had an inside mole who deliberately leaked it to the Atlantic in an effort to cause chaos in the Trump Administration hoping to force a Hegseth resignation.
Now we are getting confirmation of who the mole was. The Democrats are desperate and have nothing left but judicial fiat and anarchy trying to overthrow our government.
How do we know that?End of the day - dead terrorists. Mission accomplished.
Dude, the idiots from maga cult included the reporter in the text thread.I've been trying to tell people that since this thing started. Just said it again a few minutes ago. Signal gate is all a leftist set up. Democrats had an inside mole who deliberately leaked it to the Atlantic in an effort to cause chaos in the Trump Administration hoping to force a Hegseth resignation.
Now we are getting confirmation of who the mole was. The Democrats are desperate and have nothing left but judicial fiat and anarchy trying to overthrow our government.
He pretends to be… well maybe it’s not pretendingDude, the idiots from maga cult included the reporter in the text thread.
Are you really that stupid as you read in your post.
18 minutes of silence on a tape. Which got listened to anyway, because a tape head erasure isn't thorough.What, specifically, was the attempt to 'cover it up'?
18 minutes of silence on a tape. Which got listened to anyway, because a tape head erasure isn't thorough.
How do we know that?
Also, does this not jeopardize national security.
Three people were lying under oath, so the journalist printed the whole thing minus one CIA agent's name. Now it's: it wasn't highly security classified, and some asian man did the invite, or Jeffry Goldberg hacked his way in. Lying to stay out of trouble is one of the easiest ones to tell.I wasn't talking about Watergate. You were talking about the Signal chat when you made this comment.
But the attempt to cover it up could run a marathon.
He didn’t “hack his way in”Three people were lying under oath, so the journalist printed the whole thing minus one CIA agent's name. Now it's: it wasn't highly security classified, and some asian man did the invite, or Jeffry Goldberg hacked his way in. Lying to stay out of trouble is one of the easiest ones to tell.
![]()
'Bombs started falling': Why is the 'SignalGate' controversy exploding?
Since the bombshell Atlantic article Monday, there's lots of finger-pointing about who's to blame and how bad the security breach was. What to know.www.usatoday.com
Judge Boasberg will get to the bottom of this.
Three people were lying under oath, so the journalist printed the whole thing minus one CIA agent's name. Now it's: it wasn't highly security classified, and some asian man did the invite, or Jeffry Goldberg hacked his way in. Lying to stay out of trouble is one of the easiest ones to tell.
![]()
'Bombs started falling': Why is the 'SignalGate' controversy exploding?
Since the bombshell Atlantic article Monday, there's lots of finger-pointing about who's to blame and how bad the security breach was. What to know.www.usatoday.com
Judge Boasberg will get to the bottom of this.
I was explaining to Oldflame what the cover up is all about. That's them saying that, not me.He didn’t “hack his way in”
You’re lying
They have admitted he was invited
That he got the case seemed odd to me too. But I'm glad!You have no proof anyone was lying under oath.
Judge Boasberg, my, what another coincidence that he would get 'assigned' to this.![]()
I was explaining to Oldflame what the cover up is all about. That's them saying that, not me.
That he got the case seemed odd to me too. But I'm glad!
One of these gentlemen is tougher than the other:
View attachment 1094073
I'm a little short right now to cover that bet. Pam Bondi has no interest in an investigation.They said that was an option, I'm sure they're going to find out exactly how he got in, and I'd bet a million that it wasn't an accident.
You misspelled coincidence.Seems 'odd' does it? It's called corruption.![]()
You misspelled coincidence.