Then make it. His election is the only way to prove the allegation to be TRUE. And you don't want that? Of course you don't
Quit being goofy. The court of public opinion will make that decision like I said.
Then why didn't the "court" judge him in the way you wanted him judged in the past?
Consider this, If you believe that it was (as reported in more than a few national outlets) "common knowledge" around Gadsen, that Roy Moore had a liking for, and dated High School girls when he was in his thirties:
He was elected as Alabama Supreme Court justice, having views far removed from the DNC, the ACLU and Atheists, yet none of them were able to dig up these allegations which were "common knowledge" to stop his election?
When he refused to remove the 10 commandments from public spaces, the DNC, the ACLU and Atheists, didn't use this "common knowledge" to bolster their case against him?
When he was re elected to the Alabama Supreme Court, something the left didn't want to happen, the DNC, the ACLU and Atheists, again, none of them were able to dig up these allegations to stop his election? Even though they were "common knowledge?
When he was removed from the Court a second time for refusing to recognize Same Sex Marriage, the DNC, the LGBT community, the ACLU and other far left groups were unable to produce this "common knowledge" information to bolster their case?
Really, we are to believe that these bulldog organizations fell silent, even though this information was "common knowledge".
Someone make sense of the above.
These groups opposed to Moore's political views are either run by morons, or incredible inept. Or both?
Or we have some reverse engineering of a scandal going on here.