Mom Upset After Finding Nazi Symbol Burned Into Her Chicken Sandwich Bun At McDonalds

I am sure that the ancient symbol perchance made the sandwich taste more evil than usual...
 
I'm also opposed to hot crossed buns,



that's when a KKK member shoves a burning cross up your ass...
 
If I was the burger flipper, I'd have just put a damn pentagram on the bun.
 
How interesting!!!! At the end of the video it shows a bumber sticker on her car with a jew star of david. My guess is she put the swastika on the bun herself.

Watch the video.
North Carolina McDonald's customer finds Nazi symbol on her chicken sandwich - wptv.com


1392067162529.jpg
 
Last edited:
People are such pussies today. Oh my God, someone played a tasteless prank on me! It's not enough that I brought it to the store manager's attention and got my money back, I need to go to the news now and make sure everyone sees my outrage on television!
 
People are such pussies today. Oh my God, someone played a tasteless prank on me! It's not enough that I brought it to the store manager's attention and got my money back, I need to go to the news now and make sure everyone sees my outrage on television!

It's all about the Benjamins.
 
Some 17 year old pimple faced dumbass burger flipper got bored and decided to write stupid crap on the buns. Kids are not that bright as this demonstration shows.


WARNING DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME. ALSO MAJOR MOOB ALERT

 
Last edited by a moderator:
People are such pussies today. Oh my God, someone played a tasteless prank on me! It's not enough that I brought it to the store manager's attention and got my money back, I need to go to the news now and make sure everyone sees my outrage on television!

"Tasteless prank." When 'pranks' lead to the murders of millions they're not pranks anymore. And alerting the press to people using symbology linked to the perpetrators of those murders is not overreacting.
 
People are such pussies today. Oh my God, someone played a tasteless prank on me! It's not enough that I brought it to the store manager's attention and got my money back, I need to go to the news now and make sure everyone sees my outrage on television!

I really appreciated her taking the time to give a history lesson followed by a philosophy lesson so all of us out here in TV-land could understand what the symbol meant and who used it.

So how did this event find its way onto a newscast? She got the meal, opened it, saw the butter markings, dealt with management, then she had to call one or more TV stations, she had to wait while they sent out a crew. Did she keep the meal in her car (because they showed it in the report) or did McDonalds have to recreate the meal so that it could be broadcast on TV? Why would McDonald's recreate the meal though?

In her own little way she's pushing thought policing further down the throats of the nation. This wasn't a symbol meant to oppress anyone - the cook was probably bored. The customer before her probably had a big cock outline made with liquid better and the one before that customer probably had an FU symbol. Stupid stuff to break up the frigging monotony of working on a restaurant assembly line. So it's not a symbol of hate because it being on the inside of a bun it was meant to be unseen while being eaten, this means it wasn't a symbol at all, it was just bored kids being jackasses and having a fun time, an unthinking fun time, not meaning to terrorize restaurant customers with liquid butter swastikas. This lady though makes it out like she had a cross burned on her lawn, like it was a direct attack on her.

This reminds of the student who was expelled from a university for READING a book about the KKK. Some black crybaby was traumatized by seeing KKK on the front cover and reported him for committing a hate crime.
 
People are such pussies today. Oh my God, someone played a tasteless prank on me! It's not enough that I brought it to the store manager's attention and got my money back, I need to go to the news now and make sure everyone sees my outrage on television!

"Tasteless prank." When 'pranks' lead to the murders of millions they're not pranks anymore. And alerting the press to people using symbology linked to the perpetrators of those murders is not overreacting.

The more I read of your viewpoints the more I wonder how people like you can be so drastically wrong all the time. The posts in which I agree with you are becoming fewer and fewer.
 
People are such pussies today. Oh my God, someone played a tasteless prank on me! It's not enough that I brought it to the store manager's attention and got my money back, I need to go to the news now and make sure everyone sees my outrage on television!

"Tasteless prank." When 'pranks' lead to the murders of millions they're not pranks anymore. And alerting the press to people using symbology linked to the perpetrators of those murders is not overreacting.

Oh come on! Who among us has NEVER drawn a swastika before? ALL OF US HAVE, at some point in our lives. Now, this kid drew one on the inside of a bun, presumably where no one would ever discover it. He probably showed his buddy as a joke, just before they gave it to the customer. There is nothing evil about a harmless joke between friends. The odds that she would look at the inside of the bun is extremely unlikely, so he clearly wasnt doing it to **** with the customer. It was a joke!

This prank WILL NOT lead to the murders of millions of people.
 
15th post
The KKK incident. I got a few details wrong:

Sampson's troubles began last year when a co-worker complained after seeing him reading a book titled "Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klan."

The book's cover features white-robed Klansmen and burning crosses against a backdrop of Notre Dame's campus. It recounts a 1924 riot between Notre Dame students and the Klan in which the students from the Catholic university prevailed.

Sampson, a 58-year-old white janitor and student majoring in communication studies, said he tried to explain that the book was a historical account.

"I have an interest in American history," Sampson said. "I was trying to educate myself."

But Sampson says his union official likened the book to bringing pornography to work, and the school's affirmative action officer in November told Sampson his conduct constituted racial harassment.

"You used extremely poor judgment by insisting on openly reading the book related to a historically and racially abhorrent subject in the presence of your black co-workers," Lillian Charleston wrote in a letter to Sampson. . . .

"By first finding Sampson guilty of racial harassment simply for reading a book in the break room, then refusing to admit the gross impropriety of such a finding, IUPUI makes a mockery of its legal and moral obligations as a public institution of higher learning," wrote Adam Kissel, director of the group's Individual Rights Defense Program.

The university responded with an April letter to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and the ACLU, in which Chancellor Bantz said that he regretted what had happened and that the letters written to Sampson were not in his personnel file.

But Bantz didn't apologize to Sampson until last week, after a column in The Wall Street Journal sparked renewed criticism. Bantz also wrote to the others involved in the incident, including the co-worker who filed the complaint, said university spokesman Rich Schneider.​
 
Back
Top Bottom