Mom Arrested for Taking Phone from 15 Year Old Daughter

If the girl's dad knows why the phone was taken and still tried to get her mother put away for taking it anyway, her mother in return should try to get his visitation rights revoked because his choice of action makes it as clear as glass that he has no intention of punishing their child when she does something wrong which only makes you wonder what kind of person he is.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Yeah, you're not going to get visitation rights revoked for not continuing a particular punishment invoked by only one parent.
 
If the girl's dad knows why the phone was taken and still tried to get her mother put away for taking it anyway, her mother in return should try to get his visitation rights revoked because his choice of action makes it as clear as glass that he has no intention of punishing their child when she does something wrong which only makes you wonder what kind of person he is.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Yeah, you're not going to get visitation rights revoked for not continuing a particular punishment invoked by only one parent.

I wonder if he might for filing a false report against his ex?
 
If the girl's dad knows why the phone was taken and still tried to get her mother put away for taking it anyway, her mother in return should try to get his visitation rights revoked because his choice of action makes it as clear as glass that he has no intention of punishing their child when she does something wrong which only makes you wonder what kind of person he is.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Yeah, you're not going to get visitation rights revoked for not continuing a particular punishment invoked by only one parent.

I wonder if he might for filing a false report against his ex?

Entirely possible. But the premise of both the article and the OP are clearly horseshit.

She wasn't arrested for taking her daughter's phone. She was arrested for stealing from her ex-husband. It turned out that ex gave the police false claims as the basis of her arrest.
 
The article seems to be saying that the woman was arrested because it was believed the phone belonged to the ex, rather than the daughter, then it was determined that it did, in fact, belong to the daughter later.

So the impetus behind the arrest was not a woman taking her daughter's phone, but the false belief that the woman had taken her ex-husband's phone.

Technically, a false claim by the ex-husband. He's the one who called the cops.
 
The article seems to be saying that the woman was arrested because it was believed the phone belonged to the ex, rather than the daughter, then it was determined that it did, in fact, belong to the daughter later.

So the impetus behind the arrest was not a woman taking her daughter's phone, but the false belief that the woman had taken her ex-husband's phone.

Technically, a false claim by the ex-husband. He's the one who called the cops.

Indeed. A conclusion the thread came to hours ago.

Welcome to the party.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.


It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"



.


The ex-husband reported his phone stolen. She was arrested based on his statement.

When it was later found to be the daughter's phone, the woman was released.

What does this have to do with 'liberals'?
They arrested a mother for taking her daughters phone away.

And let the father walk even after making a false police report.

Leftism hates women.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.


It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"



.


The ex-husband reported his phone stolen. She was arrested based on his statement.

When it was later found to be the daughter's phone, the woman was released.

What does this have to do with 'liberals'?
They arrested a mother for taking her daughters phone away.

And let the father walk even after making a false police report.

Leftism hates women.

Leftism? Who were the leftists, the police or the DA?
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.


It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"



.


The ex-husband reported his phone stolen. She was arrested based on his statement.

When it was later found to be the daughter's phone, the woman was released.

What does this have to do with 'liberals'?
They arrested a mother for taking her daughters phone away.

And let the father walk even after making a false police report.

Leftism hates women.
'
They arrested the mother for stealing the ex-husbands phone. He was the one that filed the complaint.

When it was learned that it was her daughter's phone, the mother was immediately released.

You gobbled click bait nonsense.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.


It was a Christmas present, oh wait your a liberal well known to be "Indian givers"



.


The ex-husband reported his phone stolen. She was arrested based on his statement.

When it was later found to be the daughter's phone, the woman was released.

What does this have to do with 'liberals'?
They arrested a mother for taking her daughters phone away.

And let the father walk even after making a false police report.

Leftism hates women.
So youre continuing with your stupidity because you assume its less damaging to your credibility than just admitting you were a dumbass for believing the headline?
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.

Turns out the ex-husband did not own the phone. He only gave it to the girl as a gift. It turned out it was the daughter's property.

The ex-husband was the aggressor here.

So, you, too, should read the article and watch the video before pointing fingers at others.
If you're in my house, do as i say, or leave.
 
Not sure what politics has to do with it. The ex-husband is the asshole and it is an effort to control his ex-wife. He should be arrested and spend a day in jail for being an ass and wasting the polices time and taxpayers money.
 
If the girl's dad knows why the phone was taken and still tried to get her mother put away for taking it anyway, her mother in return should try to get his visitation rights revoked because his choice of action makes it as clear as glass that he has no intention of punishing their child when she does something wrong which only makes you wonder what kind of person he is.

God bless you and the lady always!!!

Holly
Yeah, you're not going to get visitation rights revoked for not continuing a particular punishment invoked by only one parent.
What if this wasn't the first time that the man went behind the back of his daughter's mother where discipline for their daughter is concerned?

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. That woman was punishing the child for something that was done at school and if one parent goes about it the way that man decided to go, why should such a parent if they can be called one be allowed to have anything more to do with the child? That man pretty much had his ex-wife get arrested for her legitimate decision to take away their child's cellular phone privilege as the child's punishment...actually in my opinion, the only thing that woman did wrong is get mixed up with him in the first place, their baby conceiving roll in the hay and everything obviously because it sounds like their child could be taking right after that word that I can't say of a man.
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.

"Just a few short minutes into the trial, the assistant prosecutor announced it was, indeed, the daughter's phone, so the case was dismissed and May left the courthouse with a clean record."

It was the daughter's phone, not very bright one. Read on!!

Greg
 
Looks like you didnt read your own source......again.

She was arrested for stealing her ex-husbands phone. You Drumpfsexuals are stupid beyond belief.

"Just a few short minutes into the trial, the assistant prosecutor announced it was, indeed, the daughter's phone, so the case was dismissed and May left the courthouse with a clean record."

It was the daughter's phone, not very bright one. Read on!!

Greg
We know it was the daughters phone you moron. :laugh:

She was arrested because the police thought she stole her ex husbands phone not because she took her daughters phone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top